Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I had do think about that for a bit. My opinion is that the RollNLock A-Series is the best overall cover. It's expensive though.

I don't mind spending money when it pays or counts. I anticipate owning this truck for 10 years, as I do all my vehicles. Paying an extra 500 bucks or so over the long run is peanuts. And, if it results in satisfaction over that time period, then it's not a problem spending the dough.

Posted (edited)

What about the Pace Edwards Full Metal Jackrabbit? Looks nice. I like that the cover housing up front sits just about flush with the top of the bed.

Edited by 4x4LJB
Posted (edited)

 

Edited by 4x4LJB
Posted

I have been using a RetraxPro for about 6 months and it functions extremely well. While it is not the most flush cover I have seen, it is very easy to use and does not leak. I can't comment on the install as it was on the truck when I bought it.

Posted

I had do think about that for a bit. My opinion is that the RollNLock A-Series is the best overall cover. It's expensive though.

 

Hahaha really? You had to think about it? you have been promoting the roll n lock for some time now. Hahaha

 

I'm not to crazy about retractables. I do know we have a Truck Covers USA retractable cover on the utility body at work. Thing seems secure and very strong. I have actually walked on top of it. They seem to be pretty spendy though. I feel most covers people have on their personal trucks don't see 1/3 the use this cover does since its on a crew work truck. After seeing how it performs day after day I would personally go with a cover from them if I wanted a retractable cover.

Posted (edited)

They all have their pros and cons.

 

TCUSA:

Pros: Double-walled aluminum, textured finish to hide scratches. Slats are connected via metal, not rubber. Small canister.

Cons: The cover requires four drain tubes. Two 1 1/8" holes have to be drilled into the rear stake pockets. Not a big deal, but the lock blocks are plastic, so if you ever have to reset them (screw a screw into them), you could have a problem. The metal slats are sealed underneath the cover by tape. So, you should be careful not to tear any of the tape or you will get water leakage. Does not have a sealed canister, it's partially open on the back side. You need to get the optional "keyless entry" which is just a small strap that when pulled, it releases the lock. If you don't get the keyless entry, you have to turn the key every 12 inches.

Neutral: Two locking points, spring loaded and locks every 12 inches.

 

RetraxPro:

Pros: Double-walled aluminum, textured finish (RetraxPro MX only) to hide scratches. Easier to operate (not spring loaded).

Cons: Canister is very large (the largest of all the retractable covers) and is plastic. Canister's lid with retracted cover is the largest loss of area.

Neutral: Two locking points, not spring loaded.

 

RollNLock A-Series:

Pros: Aluminum slats, textured finish to hide scratches. Theft resistant slats (no exposed rubber in seams). Four locking points. (Two locking points if you have a 2015 F-150 with the tailgate step and/or remote tailgate release.) Smallest area lost when cover is retracted. Small canister.

Cons: Requires four small screws to be drilled into tailgate for the additional two locking points hardware.

Neutral: Spring loaded, locks every 12 inches. To unlock every 12 inches, you have to turn the lock, but not the key.

 

All of the covers above are top-notch covers. But, if I personally had to pick one over the others, I would pick RollNLock although I would probably be happy with any of them!

Edited by TruckDaddy
  • Like 1
Posted

They all have their pros and cons.

 

TCUSA:

Pros: Double-walled aluminum, textured finish to hide scratches. Slats are connected via metal, not rubber. Small canister.

Cons: The cover requires four drain tubes. Two 1 1/8" holes have to be drilled into the rear stake pockets. Not a big deal, but the lock blocks are plastic, so if you ever have to reset them (screw a screw into them), you could have a problem. The metal slats are sealed underneath the cover by tape. So, you should be careful not to tear any of the tape or you will get water leakage. Does not have a sealed canister, it's partially open on the back side. You need to get the optional "keyless entry" which is just a small strap that when pulled, it releases the lock. If you don't get the keyless entry, you have to turn the key every 12 inches.

Neutral: Two locking points, spring loaded and locks every 12 inches.

 

RetraxPro:

Pros: Double-walled aluminum, textured finish (RetraxPro MX only) to hide scratches. Easier to operate (not spring loaded).

Cons: Canister is very large (the largest of all the retractable covers) and is plastic. Canister's lid with retracted cover is the largest loss of area.

Neutral: Two locking points, not spring loaded.

 

RollNLock A-Series:

Pros: Aluminum slats, textured finish to hide scratches. Theft resistant slats (no exposed rubber in seams). Four locking points. (Two locking points if you have a 2015 F-150 with the tailgate step and/or remote tailgate release.) Smallest area lost when cover is retracted. Small canister.

Cons: Requires four small screws to be drilled into tailgate for the additional two locking points hardware.

Neutral: Spring loaded, locks every 12 inches. To unlock every 12 inches, you have to turn the lock, but not the key.

 

All of the covers above are top-notch covers. But, if I personally had to pick one over the others, I would pick RollNLock although I would probably be happy with any of them!

Well those were good. How about reviews of the Pace-Edwards and the Gator? (I like what a I see on the RollNLock also)

Posted

Guys with the Fold-A-Cover G4 Elite, did you buy it from Fold-A-Cover direct?

 

I am not having much luck finding anybody selling it online. Locally it is either GM dealer or a local truck accessory dealer and They told they haven't sold one in years and are uncertain if they can still get them.

 

Also, anyone with this cover and an AMP Bedxtender have any fitment issues? Thinking about the bedxtender to help keep them ngs from going forward in the bed.

 

Thanks in advance for the assitance.

I ordered mine direct a week or two ago. I couldn't find anyplace else to get it excepting the stealerships.

Posted

I am in the market for a hard folding cover for my 2013 extended cab. I have read all 71 pages of this thread and must say it has made my decision even more difficult. There is no perfect cover. My original choice was the Bak Fiber max and I still may go for it. I like the flush mount, ease of installation and dent resistant. I have not seen many people say that they hate their bakflip purchase. If there are any bakflip fibermax owners out there that can give me a review of it (even better with pictures) , I would appreciate it. private messages would be great if you don't want to post in the thread. Thanks

Craig

Posted

I ordered mine direct a week or two ago. I couldn't find anyplace else to get it excepting the stealerships.

 

Thanks for the info wulfgott, That is what I was finding also.

 

A couple of places that I called that were listed as dealers on Fold a Covers website all said the samething, they no longer sell that brand.

 

I actually ordered a Leer Trilogy the other day from a local dealer after seeing pictures of it installed on other 2014/2015 GM trucks.

Posted

I ordered the Pace Edwards Jackrabbit.

 

Why? Because I like it better than the Roll-N-Lock A Series as it is entirely flush with the top of the bed. I don't like the Roll-N-Lock's front housing standing above the top of the bed.

 

Also, I like the PE's lock and hardware better. Just sayin.'

  • Like 1
Posted

I am in the market for a hard folding cover for my 2013 extended cab. I have read all 71 pages of this thread and must say it has made my decision even more difficult. There is no perfect cover. My original choice was the Bak Fiber max and I still may go for it. I like the flush mount, ease of installation and dent resistant. I have not seen many people say that they hate their bakflip purchase. If there are any bakflip fibermax owners out there that can give me a review of it (even better with pictures) , I would appreciate it. private messages would be great if you don't want to post in the thread. Thanks

Craig

 

If you want a Fibermax, then go buy the "Truck Gear by LINE-X Hard Folding Cover". It's a rebadged Fibermax and you get a lifetime warranty instead of the Fibermax's 2-year warranty.

Posted (edited)

Gentlemen,

 

Given the following factors: Price/Quality/Utility/Aesthetics, who makes the best roll-up tonneau cover?

I just installed the Truxedo Deuce. Full roll up cover with a front open option too. Install wasn't to bad and it looks good. They also have the Truxedo titanium buy it was an extra $400 and I didn't really feel like I needed it plus, I'm putting in the Truxedo tonneau mate and so I like the option of the access to the front without rolling the whole thing up. You do lose some security but I live/work in a good area so it's not a huge concern. Edited by Bandit33x
Posted

I ordered the Pace Edwards Jackrabbit.

 

Why? Because I like it better than the Roll-N-Lock A Series as it is entirely flush with the top of the bed. I don't like the Roll-N-Lock's front housing standing above the top of the bed.

 

Also, I like the PE's lock and hardware better. Just sayin.'

Did you look at the ReTraxx?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,856 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...