Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it possible that any of the covers can be used with a rack also? I see that some of them leave the stake holes mostly uncovered, but not sure if there is enough clearance to make it work. Just curious

 

Retrax covers can be ordered with the stake pocket areas cut out of the cover's rails so that you have full use of the stake pockets. This is available for GM trucks only.

Posted

That's a real advantage over all the rest - I really don't like that I can't use my stake holes for anything.

I wonder if any of the others can do that?

Posted

Has anyone run into trouble installing the access roll up tool box compatible cover? I am trying to install in my 15 sierra HD ( I know, wrong forum but not as many after market folks over there yet) and cannot for the life of me get the provided clamps that hold the rails to tighten securely. I've cranked these things down tight and even with the slightest of pressures the rails are sliding off. Any thoughts? I was thinking of throwing my impact wrench on them but am skeptical of just sheering the bolt. Thanks!

Posted

I put this on this morning. Can't say I'm absolutely in love with it, but it'll get the job done.

 

Bakflip G2

 

post-134871-14132235574_thumb.jpg

 

post-134871-141322354621_thumb.jpg

post-134871-141322354621_thumb.jpg

post-134871-14132235574_thumb.jpg

post-134871-141322354621_thumb.jpg

post-134871-14132235574_thumb.jpg

post-134871-141322354621_thumb.jpg

post-134871-14132235574_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I ordered the Ex-tang cover hard tri-fold cover for my 2500 it will be delivered next Friday, I hoping it fits. According to Amazon it does not but the Ex-tang rep sent me an e-mail telling me that was the model number I needed.

Posted

Finally got around to ordering, installing and getting pictures.

 

 

Tonneau: Bestop Zip Rail (no velcro, no snaps) See Pic

http://www.bestop.com/component/products/?view=product&id=16

 

Price: $170 (best offer on Ebay) + there is a $50 mail in rebate so $120 all said and done. :smash:

 

Friend has used this tonneau for last few trucks so I decided to give it a try. Has two cross bed arch rails that are force held into place. This was need for extra clearance as my cooler is a bit taller than the side rails so a flush fit wouldn't work. the arches and the rear tailgate bar are quick to remove (30 secs). Only drawback, not water tight at all as is. Will show in pics. Other note: Tonneau is listed on Bestop site as 07-14. I emailed them and asked if they were releasing a new one for the new model and they said no. Dimensions are very similar. Some sites if you look, i.e. autoanything, will say it doesn't fit. I confirmed again with bestop and found this one for 189 on ebay and offered 170 and gave it a shot. Fits great. It does cover the rear "hand holes" though. Some additional foam stripping in the places noted in the pics and it would seal up. Enough rambling and pictures.... I know....

 

20141014_124506.jpg

 

20141023_164451.jpg

 

^^^^ Driveway is sloped right to left in pic, but a level is still needed... soon... ^^^^

 

 

20141023_164552.jpg

 

^^^^ Gap across tailgate. Plan on putting some weather stripping on the tailgate that will meet up with existing seal ^^^^

 

20141023_164522.jpg

 

^^^^ This shows the Zip Rail System. The black flap (rigid ish) folds into the gap on the rail. It is a very snug fit and very secure. No velcro to wear out or snaps to deal with ^^^^

(used in old Jeep bikini tops)

 

20141023_164603.jpg

 

^^^^ Here you can see the cross arches, mounting hardware and at the front top seal, left and right a small gap. Again, some extra stripping will seal it up. ^^^^

 

I know I need spray in liner bad. I'm just doing my part to scuff it up first.

 

Posted

Anyone have pictures of a double can with a tonneau?

 

Thanks.

5512e1be7afb3176eef45ca2d0606590.jpg

 

Here's a Truxedo Lo Pro QT on my double cab. Easy to install and no leaks either.

  • Like 1
Posted

I run an Access soft rollup Tonneau cover.

was like $275 on amazon.

easy to install. looks nice. keeps my stuff dry.

best of all, rolls up in a minute when I put my quad in the bed.

I see real truck has a video about installing the rear clamp in the 2014 requiring some extra steps, but from the video makes it look like with a bed liner it won't be possible. How is your rear/Tailgate Clamp installed?

Posted (edited)

I just installed a Roll-X cover to my 2015 Silverado. The installation was very simple. My daughter and I did it in under and hour, and we didn't rush it at all. The cover is very good looking, and I love the rolling functionality of it. I've used only tri-fold hard covers before, but wanted to try something different this time. Glad I went this way. But the product is far from perfect, as I've found out.

Plusses:
- Very good looking, as it's very flush with the bed rail.
- Still leaves enough room around the side for the hand hold hole (14/15 Silverado example)
- Easy to operate
- Sturdy construction, but probably not as sturdy as a tri-fold. I wouldn't put weight on it.
- Very easy to install in < 1 hour

Negatives.
- I expect this cover to leak like crazy. The front corners of the bed are left very open.
- Doesn't seem very tight on the bed, may move around. Time will tell on that one...
- The closing method doesn't always grab correctly. You have to push down on parts of the cover to make it grab everything as you close it.
- I don't feel this cover is very secure. More later on this...

Lets go over the negatives a bit more. The corners of the cover, especially the front corners don't seem well engineered. I can easily see where water would seep in. With a little wind the corners of the rubber here could life leaving a gaping hole for water. They should have made the seal in the corner more robust, and probably even engineering a clamp to work in the corner. It basically could use a cross member here to help with the tie down and sealing of the cover. The cover just "floats" here (float's not the right word, but I can't quite explain it like I want to.) The install just seems a bit hokey, as you have to adjust a lot to get it to align just right forward and backwards on the bed. They should know the length perfectly and just make it fit. It there was a similar cross bar along the front edge with a solid seal, similar to the side bed bars used to hold down the cover, and have the cover attach to this front cross member I feel the cover would be 1000 times improved in stability, fit and water tightness.

Last, I really don't see this cover as being highly secure. Seems to me you could easily slip a hanger under the cover at the tailgate and grab one of the release wires to undo the cover. I don't want to tear my cover up, so I've no tried this. But I can't see it being that hard to get into the bed with this cover locked.

But, overall I still like the cover as it looks great and is easy to use. Next time I'll probably go back to the Extang Tri-Fold hard cover, as it was solid as a rock and extremely secure.

Edited by Nargg
Posted

Nargg, did you install the included weather stripping along the front bed rail? Mine came with a thick one and a thin one, I actually installed both (thin one on top of the thick one). I still noticed some small leaks at the front corners, and found it was mainly due to the side seals were not sitting flush on the rails (just the front corners). So I decided to glue the side seals to rails, about a 2 inch long section along each side at each front corner. Barely see a drip now.

 

I didn't see a big deal in having to adjust the cover a few times during installation, basically after you adjust it backwards so the rear bulb seal is touching the tailgate, you're set. As far as security, it seems like the thief would need to know exactly where to stick the coat hanger, because all I see is that rear bulbs seal when I try to pry up on the rear of the cover. It's the same setup with their Bakflip folding model too. I think some people have rigged up a piece of metal bracket to cover over that gap where the release cable is, so then you can't hook it with a coat hanger.

Posted

Nargg, did you install the included weather stripping along the front bed rail? Mine came with a thick one and a thin one, I actually installed both (thin one on top of the thick one). I still noticed some small leaks at the front corners, and found it was mainly due to the side seals were not sitting flush on the rails (just the front corners). So I decided to glue the side seals to rails, about a 2 inch long section along each side at each front corner. Barely see a drip now.

 

I didn't see a big deal in having to adjust the cover a few times during installation, basically after you adjust it backwards so the rear bulb seal is touching the tailgate, you're set. As far as security, it seems like the thief would need to know exactly where to stick the coat hanger, because all I see is that rear bulbs seal when I try to pry up on the rear of the cover. It's the same setup with their Bakflip folding model too. I think some people have rigged up a piece of metal bracket to cover over that gap where the release cable is, so then you can't hook it with a coat hanger.

 

I'm looking into glueing the front corners too. Got a brand new hot glue gun, and haven't had anything to use it on yet... :) I do see a big deal in having to re-engineer a product to work as intended. Small leaks are OK, this is a major hole. I still say a cross member holding the cover tightly at the front with proper seals and hard strap buckle mounts (the buckles rattle like crazy between the bed and cab.) would be a 1000% improvement in this product. I hope they continue to improve, maybe on version 3 of this cover?

 

I also thought about covering/blocking the release cable. Probably do exactly what you suggested with the metal bracket. Thanks.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...