Jump to content

Alpine X009-gmk2


Dj0nes

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like alpine has some spot on ideas for the summer. Not much info released yet but I figured I'd throw this out there. Price will be steep I hear 2500.

 

3ynaqy3u.jpgna9e4y9u.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

The model that is actually pictured is the Alpine INE-W957HD which does fit, but is a 7 inch display and half the cost.

 

http://www.crutchfield.com/p_500W957H/Alpine-INE-W957HD.html?tp=20212

 

The reason I don't plan to change the head unit immediately is due to the vehicle control features which do not seem to be accessible without factory head unit or the additional purchase of something like iDatalink Maestro.

 

I will see if I can find some others.

Posted

Use your stock head and add a signal processor with a real amp like the audiocontrol dq-61 or rockford 3sisty.3 you will be better off and cost 1/3 the price.

Posted

The reason I don't plan to change the head unit immediately is due to the vehicle control features which do not seem to be accessible without factory head unit or the additional purchase of something like iDatalink Maestro.

 

 

 

The iDatalink Maestro for the K2XX is in now beta. I read it over on their forum. It should be out this year. If it works as advertised, it should let you retain all factory controls and settings through the aftermarket touchscreen.

 

That will be a nice alternative to the current system. And an easy way to add CarPlay or AndroidAuto if that rings your bell.

Posted

I've been rolling this around...I figure it'll be near the unit's retail of $2700 by the time it's installed. Add $500 for Maestro and other stuff and this thing will climb over $3k in a hurry. I asked myself...'Am I gonna be $3000+ happier?' I'm not thinkin so at this time.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Well, Alpine told me they will be releasing a new solution for our 2014-15 at CES in January 2016. I bet it is the 9 inch screen and integration they have used in other systems. They wont say before the official release, I don't blame them.

 

I am excited to see the option, not sure I will cough up the $3k + I expect it will cost.

 

I would love to have true RCA outputs from a quality source unit to power new components off an amp. My base system is not horrible, but is in no way what a quality aftermarket sound system would be.

Posted

I'm pretty sure I'm not diggin in my pocket for $3k for a radio and nav. I have a factory nav, a smartphone, a Garmin, and a cellular iPad. I don't watch videos in my truck nor is it on my list of must haves.

 

If someone were to do a Garmin interface with the factory 8" system for a reasonable cost, I'd do that

Posted

I tried, in vain, not to open this thread. The circa $3k total price of entry makes it easy to close it up for awhile, and I love prior Alpine stuff in both auto and marine.

 

+1 to a line-out processor for additional linked power, subs, speakers while maintaining the OEM head unit.

Posted

Don't get me wrong, the chances of me doing this are very low. I would not do it for the Nav, my only desire is for sound quality. I used to cringe at an Alpine deck over $200 back in the day, the prices are crazy now.

 

But the dream of a true high quality 24bit DA converter and RCA outputs that I can run to a quality amp are a dream after buying this new truck.

 

Being a car stereo guy of the 90's, owning many (and I mean many) high quality amps and speakers I cannot imagine converting the stock head unit to RCA and getting what I want. I remember buying a $650 RF amp in 1996 that was very highly reviewed. It sounded like junk compared to the Orion and Soundstream amps I had. I realized then that not everyone was concerned about the details of sound quality, it would play loud.

 

So will the Alpine bring me $3k in happiness? I doubt I will be willing to find out. But I can dream a little, right? Still excited to see what they release!

Posted

For those interested I amp dying to install this amp in my truck!!!

 

IMG_7219_zpsidokrouc.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 546 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...