Jump to content

the first person to get an Edelbrock SC on a 6.2!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 262
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I can say that if $7500 is going to be the price point, they are not the cheapest, about 20% more expensive actually.

i did not remember the price, he said it would be less than the kit for the stingray, i seem to recall about 500 less. so if you know what the stingray kit is you can figure it off of that.

i bet you guys don't deliver an installed kit for that? do you?

Posted

To anyone that can answer: What is the expected life of a stock 6L80 with that much power in front of it? I'm used to standard transmissions or Allisons behind forced induction vehicles. I had two GM vehicles come through my shop with 1900 magnachargers. Neither of them could get a 4L65 to last more than 20k miles. I know the 4L65 had plenty of problems behind stock engines, but is the 6L80 really much better?

Posted

That depends on the driver more than anything else. I have a 92 Chevy truck posted in the other rides section. The transmission in that lasted to 110 K miles. The engine got freshen at 80K. I had a modded trailblazer SS that went 80K, I was brutal on that.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

To anyone that can answer: What is the expected life of a stock 6L80 with that much power in front of it? I'm used to standard transmissions or Allisons behind forced induction vehicles. I had two GM vehicles come through my shop with 1900 magnachargers. Neither of them could get a 4L65 to last more than 20k miles. I know the 4L65 had plenty of problems behind stock engines, but is the 6L80 really much better?

honestly i am not too concerned about it, first of all i live at 6500 feet elevation, the SC will get me about 25% more power than a stock truck at sea level, we loose so much power up here its nuts!

Posted

After reading most of this, I think I went blind on page 11. The thing that gets you down the track is not peak torque or HP. You want power everywhere not just high peaks. These motors may only make a few more peak, but they make a lot more torque everywhere.

Here is my all stock truck at like 10 feet above sea level. It sure is way fatter than I tune the Gen IV motors.

20140516 112013

Last has anyone noticed the difference in the LS9 dyno on GM Performance site and the LT4 dyno released? The LS9 makes only about half the torque at 3800 rpm of the LT4 at 1200 rpm.
Posted

Do you think this is because of the variable cam timing? Or the direct injection?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Its the direct injection allowing a higher comp ratio ( 10:1 vs 9:1), and I bet boost earlier due to the smaller blower (1740cc/rev vs 2300cc/rev).

 

I don't "think" there is a more aggressive cam due to having to deal with afm on the lt4

Posted

 

After reading most of this, I think I went blind on page 11. The thing that gets you down the track is not peak torque or HP. You want power everywhere not just high peaks. These motors may only make a few more peak, but they make a lot more torque everywhere.

Here is my all stock truck at like 10 feet above sea level. It sure is way fatter than I tune the Gen IV motors.

She is strong! Nice numbers.. 100% agreed.. Power under the curve is where this engine shines.

 

Its the direct injection allowing a higher comp ratio ( 10:1 vs 9:1), and I bet boost earlier due to the smaller blower (1740cc/rev vs 2300cc/rev)

I think the CR is higher... like in the 11.5??

Posted

To anyone that can answer: What is the expected life of a stock 6L80 with that much power in front of it? I'm used to standard transmissions or Allisons behind forced induction vehicles. I had two GM vehicles come through my shop with 1900 magnachargers. Neither of them could get a 4L65 to last more than 20k miles. I know the 4L65 had plenty of problems behind stock engines, but is the 6L80 really much better?

Guys with G8's are making some insane power and the trannys are holding pretty decent. One here locally runs low 10's on stocker unit but with a stall. No doubt they are stronger than any of the 4spd trannys.

Posted

 

I think the CR is higher... like in the 11.5??

That is the lt1 in the base vette, they dropped the cr a bit for the lt4

Posted

Guys with G8's are making some insane power and the trannys are holding pretty decent. One here locally runs low 10's on stocker unit but with a stall. No doubt they are stronger than any of the 4spd trannys.

.

 

I think a toothpick is stronger that the old 4l60/4l65 lol

Posted

Its the direct injection allowing a higher comp ratio ( 10:1 vs 9:1), and I bet boost earlier due to the smaller blower (1740cc/rev vs 2300cc/rev).

 

I don't "think" there is a more aggressive cam due to having to deal with afm on the lt4

10:1 is low. Hell my old gen 3 has a stock CR of 10.1:1. The DI motors run over 12:1

Posted

10:1 is low. Hell my old gen 3 has a stock CR of 10.1:1. The DI motors run over 12:1

GM kept the cr on the gen v small blocks kinda low for DI. Not sure if it was due to emissions or cylinder pressure or what.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,087 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...