Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Took my Vette to our last "Jim T's Summer Cruise" of the season... It was Trunk-or-Treat night and a record turnout in 80 degree temps... over 800 cars and 5000 spectators tonight! Pretty awesome night..... :thumbs:

 

20141025_180141.jpeg

Edited by Luster
  • Like 1
Posted

Damn that's a nice turnout.

 

I had mine out Friday morning, hit a rain storm during my quick ride :(

 

ec04c36fed881b18bf5970bd51bb31b2.jpg

 

 

Ryan

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The last cruise in of the year for Tulsa will be Tuesday, might have to go. If the two other guys trying to buy my bird when I was want it, that could get interesting if they made an offer. This thing would take so long to find the right buyer for(usually Pontiac guy(they absolutely LOVE Pontiacs with dedicated Pontiac V8s and performance parts), who wants a high horsepower Firebird/Pontiac, ready to race, and doesn't mind its older, imperfect paint work.) I guess I was the exception on to the rule, I just appreciated that the previous owner went through the expense of now copping out and putting in a SBC. If someone offers within a few hundred of what I have in it, it will be sold, even more if its not for sale. Learned that lesson of turning down good offers on my last classic.

 

 

Ran it around a bit last night. A new Benz pulled up next to me at a light on the highway and the guy and his girl were looking at it, and then it started inching up. I have no idea if he was trying anything, but when the light turned green I showed him he had no chance, when I hit the limit(55) and let off he hadn't made it through the intersection. :lol:

 

That's one thing that stinks about the car, if your trying to obey the law, the fun only lasts a few seconds!

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

C and c here yesterday had a bmw I8 seen photos looked sweet

 

 

Ryan

Posted (edited)

I'm still confused by why you want to sell it?

I just added some more to the post. Its not "for sale" but if someone wants it bad enough, I will sell. I learned that lesson on my 69 Camaro RS. I turned down 26K~, and when I sold it every offer I got for weeks was 20K.

 

The thing is a blast, crap load of power, quick and tight steering(not sure what box it has), and its fine to drive around town if you know what your getting into(very loud, big cam, choppy idle, sits pretty low, limit your short trips to 4~ on hot days or the battery will get punished by high power fans and starter, you might not have it running enough to recharge it) and since the paint is nice enough to get comments, but not so nice you worry about it.

 

The front suspension is adjustable, but I'd rather just lower the back eventually with a 4-link or torque arm.

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

^ I'm sure you've got pics of it somewhere but mind posting again? I've got a 800+ hp ws6, so I'm a big fan of the fast Pontiac's

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Posted (edited)

I took a couple videos of my WS6 today! Had to do it before it ends up stored for the winter tomorrow. Can't figure out how to post the videos with my iPhone so will have to post later with photobucket.

 

But here's a pic for now. About 670 rwhp. Supercharger, cam, headers, lq9 motor, and tons more. post-126516-141447363584_thumb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

post-126516-141447363584_thumb.jpg

post-126516-141447363584_thumb.jpg

post-126516-141447363584_thumb.jpg

Edited by Roidz
  • Like 4
Posted

I was one of those Pontiac guys too. Stopped by a dealer in 2006 staring at a GTO. Miss the Firebird, but after finding out it had been wrecked by the previous owner, it got traded off a few months after this was taken in September 2006.

post-29472-0-09404500-1414474947_thumb.jpg

post-29472-0-09404500-1414474947_thumb.jpg

post-29472-0-09404500-1414474947_thumb.jpg

post-29472-0-09404500-1414474947_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I took a couple videos of my WS6 today! Had to do it before it ends up stored for the winter tomorrow. Can't figure out how to post the videos with my iPhone so will have to post later with photobucket.

 

But here's a pic for now. About 670 rwhp. Supercharger, cam, headers, lq9 motor, and tons more. attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1414473631.939912.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Selling mine was one of my biggest mistakes. Tried to buy it back. Not a chance. .. it was a great ride!

 

c511daec-f792-4dc6-ae8e-b18316d60721.jpg

Edited by Luster
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

cef73a3e5dbb303bcdd2170228a4d130.jpg

2c2029621027cc442e3e32f2a151f2a2.jpg

041737cc41929ff5b7f498ab1b03c8a1.jpg

 

Nice WS6!

 

I bought mine in July and had been sorting things out until recently.

 

I tried to have mine chassis dyno'ed but the shop couldn't keep from spinning the wheels at 5400. (They, an import shop, said they weren't sure, maybe it was a "timing issue", but got on some classic car sites and asked around and the general consensus led up to a experienced dyno guy telling me it was wheelspin on the graph. )

 

I ended up looking at the MSD digital 6 and noticed it was retarded 10 degrees, and the plugs looked better after I removed that, so I probably got some good power gains just there!

 

It had a blower before the previous owner bought it, so I figure the 10 degree retard was from that.

 

Its all motor, no power adders. I figure 700 or more HP, and here is how I get to that:

 

With the 10 degree retard it hit 480rwhp at 5400 when the wheels started spinning. But power drop off on the road is felt at 6100-6200, which is about right when looking at similar engines in magazine builds I have found. Those engines made 690 to 730 flywheel. My trans is a TH400, and while tough, is a power suck. Then, I'm told that 10 degrees I have back could be anywhere from 20-50 HP.

 

If there was only a dyno in Tulsa experienced with high HP RWD muscle cars!

Edited by SnakeEyes
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

6abf67121f81b96feee65b655bdaf5be.jpg

 

Got more attention than I was expecting. Had to answer the same engine questions a dozen or two times. Will have to print up a Q&A sheet for next year :lol:

Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

cef73a3e5dbb303bcdd2170228a4d130.jpg

2c2029621027cc442e3e32f2a151f2a2.jpg

041737cc41929ff5b7f498ab1b03c8a1.jpg

 

Nice WS6!

 

I bought mine in July and had been sorting things out until recently.

 

I tried to have mine chassis dyno'ed but the shop couldn't keep from spinning the wheels at 5400. (They, an import shop, said they weren't sure, maybe it was a "timing issue", but got on some classic car sites and asked around and the general consensus led up to a experienced dyno guy telling me it was wheelspin on the graph. )

 

I ended up looking at the MSD digital 6 and noticed it was retarded 10 degrees, and the plugs looked better after I removed that, so I probably got some good power gains just there!

 

It had a blower before the previous owner bought it, so I figure the 10 degree retard was from that.

 

Its all motor, no power adders. I figure 700 or more HP, and here is how I get to that:

 

With the 10 degree retard it hit 480rwhp at 5400 when the wheels started spinning. But power drop off on the road is felt at 6100-6200, which is about right when looking at similar engines in magazine builds I have found. Those engines made 690 to 730 flywheel. My trans is a TH400, and while tough, is a power suck. Then, I'm told that 10 degrees I have back could be anywhere from 20-50 HP.

 

If there was only a dyno in Tulsa experienced with high HP RWD muscle cars!

Gorgeous!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Selling mine was one of my biggest mistakes. Tried to buy it back. Not a chance. .. it was a great ride!

 

c511daec-f792-4dc6-ae8e-b18316d60721.jpg

Very nice. My dad had one just like it. It's the reason I got mine.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

  • Like 1
Posted

SCORE! At the car show a guy recommended a Mustang Tuner to dyno. They use a Dynapak, which mounts to the wheel hubs. The tires can't slip! Sounds like I need to get up there!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...