Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For some reason, my garage door opener will only work if I'm right up against the door with the truck. In my wife's Buick, which I assume uses the same setup, she can open her door from the street as she's turning into the driveway. I normally back into the garage, but I switched to driving in forward this week to see if it worked any better, to no avail. My driveway is only about 60-70' long, so it's not like it's a country mile.

 

Every other vehicle I've owned, along with the supplied remotes for the door, will open the door from the street.

 

Anyone else have this issue?

Posted

I'm able to open my garage from the street before I even pull into my driveway. There's definitely something wrong with yours.

Posted

Just curious, for those of you who are having distance issues, is your garage at street level or higher?

Posted

Mine works from the down the street - previous truck did too.

 

This issue has been posted before, so you're not the only one. Sorry i don't recall the outcome of the previous post.

 

Try reteaching it, and/or teaching it on one of the other buttons.

 

Post your results for others.

Posted

Mine needs to be close too. I have heard that you want a brand new battery when you sync the controller to your truck. I know mine was not new back then, but I intend to see if I can re-sync with a brand new battery this weekend. I guess that the newer battery sends a stronger signal, and therefore syncs in a stronger signal to your trucks controller. I'll let you know if it works.

 

"Hell, I'd piss on a spark plug if I thought it would do any good"!

Posted

Same issue on my '14 Sierra. Our Enclave, Jeep and the remotes that came with the opener will get the job done from out in the street (60' Driveway). My new truck only opens the door half of the time and then, the truck has to be just inches from the door (thank goodness for parking assist). I've never had success down the on the street or in the driveway.

 

I took the truck to the dealer today and was questioned if I properly "trained and learned" the remote to the truck then the truck to the opener. Obviously I did since it works occasionally. One of my "We Owe" items requires a part to be ordered so when that arrives, they're going to check out the transmitter. I'm a little concerned because the service writer didn't seem too optimistic about the fix.

Posted

I have to be right next to the garage door also. The remote that came with the door opener works almost a half block away.

 

This problem in not unique to our trucks. Do a Google search and you will find a ton of hits with different makes and models.

 

I appears to me that the Homelink transmitters vary considerably in their power output from one unit to the next.

 

Homelink is useless for customer support. They always seem to say the same thing (Make sure your training remote has a new battery and re-learn).

Posted

Just curious, for those of you who are having distance issues, is your garage at street level or higher?

My garage floor is approximately 42-48" above the grade of the street.

 

I will try the new battery in the remote. The one in there is not very old, and it worked fine programming the wife's Buick 3 weeks before programming my truck, but it's a cheap fix. I'll also try programming a different button. Won't be able to get to it until next weekend, but I will report the results.

 

Thanks for these tips.

Posted

I put a new battery in the garage remote. Cancelled the previous home link setting, and relearned the the trucks remote. It did increase my range from right in front of the garage door to half way down my driveway. Not great but better. The hand remote will open the garage door from the road at the edge of the yard, which is over 2x the distance.

 

I may try a new frequency setting code on the opener, if the door isn't moving fast enough. Doubt that it will make a difference, but you never know?

 

At least I don't have to kiss the garage door with the front bumper now to get it to open.

Posted

I put and extension on my garage door opener antenna. Ran a 10 ft piece of wire and spliced it to the antenna wore.

 

The door opens fine now. The homelink seems fairly directional in the trucks. Had no issues with my Treaverse's I owned before.

  • Like 1
Posted

Same issue here with my 2014 Sierra and our 2015 Yukon. Thanks to the previous posters for the tips. I'll give em a try.

Posted

Our 2014 Tahoe works great from 60 feet away but our 2014 Silverado works if I pull up directly in front of garage door.

 

 

Milo's iPhone

  • Like 1
Posted

I put a new battery in the garage remote. Cancelled the previous home link setting, and relearned the the trucks remote. It did increase my range from right in front of the garage door to half way down my driveway. Not great but better. The hand remote will open the garage door from the road at the edge of the yard, which is over 2x the distance.

 

I may try a new frequency setting code on the opener, if the door isn't moving fast enough. Doubt that it will make a difference, but you never know?

 

At least I don't have to kiss the garage door with the front bumper now to get it to open.

this is a common issue and fix for the home links in all gms'

i had this issue in my old car, put a fresh battery in the standard remote and programmed it.

i havent gotten around to programming my truck yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...