Jump to content

Possible Blown Engine with less the 2,000 miles.


manlystanley

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes...they are not the same as a muscle car but then again it never mattered back then either but does it matter now when you are spending big $ on a numbers matching

 

car? That is me wanting a new truck for what they cost. Mine was $55,000 and if anything that major happens then I think I would want the same. A new engine to be safe

 

is the smart thing to do of course but it will bug me to do so...JMOP

 

Sierra Boy

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Yes...they are not the same as a muscle car but then again it never mattered back then either but does it matter now when you are spending big $ on a numbers matching

 

car? That is me wanting a new truck for what they cost. Mine was $55,000 and if anything that major happens then I think I would want the same. A new engine to be safe

 

is the smart thing to do of course but it will bug me to do so...JMOP

 

Sierra Boy

 

I was also saying that from what I've seen that even in classic trucks it doesn't matter nearly as much if it has matching #s. Of course it would be nice in any classic, but the price difference between matching #s and non-matching #s will be a whole lot more for a car than a truck. Just what I've noticed.

 

Again I'll just say that if the truck hasn't given him any other problems then I don't see a reason to even ask for another truck. If it's been problem ridden then ya, but he hasn't mentioned anything else. With 2,000 miles any problem would have shown by then. Trust me I would be completely pissed as I've had major work done on my old 98 when I had it and would be even more pissed if this happened to my '14, but all you can do is let them figure out the problem and the best solution. If they do have to replace the engine it's not like it will just be a regular crate engine. It will be a genuine GM engine that came in the K2s. The 1st engine that ble win my 98 I made sure they put the same 5.7 Vortec from a 96-98 truck so I knew it was at least the same exact engine mainly for when I needed to work on it. The 2nd time when it seized I sold it and I believe the shop I sold it to just put a regular crate engine in it. If it happened to me with this truck like it did him I would beg them to put a 6.2 in it but I know GM wouldn't go for that lol.

Posted

I agree with allot of what your are say....it is not a fun thing to go through this ordeal with the engine going south but if the rest of the truck is problem free then I guess a

 

new GM engine with be the answer. Lets hope it is something non life threating for the engine and up and running again.

 

Your are right about the car being worth more then a matching number truck...just the thought of replacing the engine is allot of work and hoping all went well during the

 

transplant.

 

Sierra Boy

Posted

GM is not going to give him a new engine. They will tear the engine apart and replace the faulty part (if they can find it).

Posted

Think about all the millions of rod bearing caps that GM produces every year. Now think about how probable it is that least a couple of them were cast with a microscopic flaw.

Especially if they are made in China or Mexico and quality control has been thrown out the window. :rolleyes:

Posted

So, the dealer got back to me, but I was out when they called. The voice mail said:

 

-- replacing cam shafts in truck.

-- Will be ready late Tuesday or Wednesday.

 

 

Question: How much damage can broken cam shafts cause??

 

 

Thanks,

Stan

Posted

So, the dealer got back to me, but I was out when they called. The voice mail said:

 

-- replacing cam shafts in truck.

-- Will be ready late Tuesday or Wednesday.

 

 

Question: How much damage can broken cam shafts cause??

 

 

Thanks,

Stan

First, there no "camshafts" in this engine. It is a pushrod engine with a single central cam. Second, are you sure they are not replacing the hydraulic valve lifters or pushrods instead of the cam shaft? If one or more lobes broke on the cam, one or more valves would not move, causing all kinds of performance problems and a lot of smoke and very rough running engine. If the engine is only noisy, most likely one of the hydraulic valve lifters is bad.

Posted

First, there no "camshafts" in this engine. It is a pushrod engine with a single central cam. Second, are you sure they are not replacing the hydraulic valve lifters or pushrods instead of the cam shaft? If one or more lobes broke on the cam, one or more valves would not move, causing all kinds of performance problems and a lot of smoke and very rough running engine. If the engine is only noisy, most likely one of the hydraulic valve lifters is bad.

 

 

No idea then. Further, it does not give me a rosy felling that they are telling me that non-existent parts are being replaced!

I'm been calling up the dealer, no one is returning my phone calls.

 

Best Regards,

Stan

Posted

 

 

No idea then. Further, it does not give me a rosy felling that they are telling me that non-existent parts are being replaced!

I'm been calling up the dealer, no one is returning my phone calls.

 

Best Regards,

Stan

 

Then make a personal visit and stop relying on vague phone messages and secondhand information.

Posted

 

Don't let 'em blow smoke up your azz. I would be going down there to see what condition the motor is in, and for clarification of the problem. I would also request to see the faulty parts before they send them back to GM.

 

Good luck, and keep a record of all your contacts and communications with them, just in case it is needed later.

 

Posted

Damn. Called up the service manager, read off PM26's email, like I knew what I was talking about. He said, that oh sorry..... The complete engine has failed and they are putting in a new engine. I said I wanted to go see it. I am on my way down.

 

I'm concerned they are blowing smoke and am just patching it up and keeping the original engine.

 

 

I'll tell you guys what happens.

 

 

 

Thanks!

 

 

Best regards,

Stan

Posted

Damn. Called up the service manager, read off PM26's email, like I knew what I was talking about. He said, that oh sorry..... The complete engine has failed and they are putting in a new engine. I said I wanted to go see it. I am on my way down.

 

I'm concerned they are blowing smoke and am just patching it up and keeping the original engine.

 

 

I'll tell you guys what happens.

 

 

 

Thanks!

 

 

Best regards,

Stan

Sounds fishy from their first response to now replacing the engine. Sounds like someone got their messages crossed up (not you)

 

 

Ryan

Posted

A personal inspection is in order. Good call. Like PM said, only one camshaft. But a broken camshaft can wreak ALL kinds of havoc. But a broken cam is highly unlikely. Just doesn't happen that often in a production engine. Anything is possible I guess, but damn.

 

Fishy, went from "camshaftS" to "new engine".

Posted

I went out to the dealership, and I need to update my last e-mail.

 

-- The service front end guy, is confused or something.

 

-- He told me there was a broken CAM shaft (via voice mail). But, the service manager told me it needed a new engine.

 

-- I have dealt with this dealer before, and they always seemed to be very honest and wanted to satisfy customers. So, I have no reason to doubt what they say.

 

-- The service manager showed me the part that pushed the piston up and down. It looked like a U with a large bolts on both ends.

 

-- he said, they could have fixed it, but, did not want to chance it with such a new truck.

 

-- I told him: I want on the receipt: New engine and that it has been in the shop since the 23'rd. He said no problem.

 

-- I asked to see the new engine, he said it had not come yet.

 

-- So, I am getting a new engine, I fell good about that. But, wonder, if I should go back tot he selling dealer and demand a new truck? I don't know.

 

Anyways, you guys have been great!!

Posted

That's a piston rod, not a camshaft. But good deal on new motor.

 

Any chance to step up to the 6.2? ;)

 

Get any pics of the rod?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...