Jump to content

be aware: cupholder design flaw


d3m0n

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is the best picture I can make. Not good at that stuff. I just left the truck in the sun to warm up the rubber. Start pulling the greyish cupholder part up. You can see where my finger is where to start pulling. It feels like plastic but is just hard rubber. There are also two prongs under holders 1 an3 that hold the rubber at the bottom. Little tug and these will come off. As you get around by the tabs, the rubber ring will have a split. Just keep tugging and the tabs will cone off, They are like a hard rubber but didn't break.

post-141658-0-20935600-1429816938.jpg

post-141658-0-20935600-1429816938.jpg

post-141658-0-20935600-1429816938.jpg

post-141658-0-20935600-1429816938.jpg

  • 3 months later...
  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

:lol: certainly better than filling your seat with coffee huh?

 

I wonder if they've changed this in the 2015s.. (probably not.) This seems like a big oversight.

 

They have not. I'm extremely displeased with the complete lack of oversight about the ensuing problems to the truck this can and will cause.

 

No, it is not an oversight. It was CHEAPER to make it this way.

 

Cheaper why and how? because of the immensely small amount of material that wasn't consumed to make the item? That's a pretty small amount of money per and it likely was MORE than offset with the extra material that they had to put into the mold and the process to make them.

 

It's a cup HOLDER not a cup. It's to hold the CUP not it's contents. The CUP holds the liquid, the HOLDER holds the cup. Simple.

 

Yes, it's a cup holder. And yes, the liquid is supposed to stay in the cup. McDonald's coffee cups are notorious for leaking through the glued seam, however, and all it takes is ONE TIME to completely ruin your armrest. Maybe someone that has had damage should submit this as a warranty claim and see what comes back.

 

The answer has already been stated. Cost.

 

Manufacturing the cup holder assembly as they did may have saved $0.025 per unit as compared to sealing it. Multiply $0.025 x all K2 trucks sold over a typical 7 year model cycle, and you've got yourself a sizable sum of money.

 

Is an unsealed cup holder an inconvenience? Yes. Will it be a deal breaker for prospective buyers? No.

 

In the long run, GM saved hundreds of thousands of dollars and doesn't have to deal with any downsides, save for having to field a couple customer hotline phone calls.

 

It won't be a deal breaker because A) the dealers aren't even aware of the issue and B) if they were, they won't talk to the prospective customers to make them aware. I had no idea until AFTER I bought the truck, and I was pretty irritated. Would it have stopped me from buying had I known before? No. But, I could have gotten the issue heavily documented as PART OF THE SALE.

 

Trying to save a few pennies on substandard quality cup holders is just the tip of the iceberg of insatiable greed. GM is doing the same thing on every part on these trucks, including critical assemblies such as differentials and transmissions. I simply do not trust any GM new car or truck made after 2013 and unless I see a quick turnaround and reinstatement of proper quality control, I will not buy any more vehicles from this company. And I owned quite a few GM vehicles in my life.

 

Here's an idea... Instead of trying to save portions of a penny when building my truck, how about getting rid of the RIDICULOUS rebates and over-pricing. Price the truck correctly right from the start and make up that portion of a penny's cost by selling more trucks.

Posted

 

 

Here's an idea... Instead of trying to save portions of a penny when building my truck, how about getting rid of the RIDICULOUS rebates and over-pricing. Price the truck correctly right from the start and make up that portion of a penny's cost by selling more trucks.

 

They tried that already. When I bought my 14 back in Sept of 13 they were not offering much in the way of discounts if any. i think I got $1500. I used supplier pricing and actually got a good deal. A month or 2 later they raised the prices and then started offering discounts on them. The American public wants a "discount" on everything we buy. Looking at my truck now price wise I could not afford it as I only buy what I can comfortably afford to pay for.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Bringing this thread back up as I was looking to see what I could find about the cup holders in the center fold-down seat back in the 40-20-40 front seats as they don't allow a 12oz can to sit down into the holder as one would expect, and then I come across this issue of leaking fluid, either of the drink or condensation.

 

Anyone know if the '17's have the same design or did GM get their act together and change the rubber insert to be a solid piece with NO openings to allow the potential of liquids to leak into the storage area or seat material?

 

 

Looked on some online GM Parts sites and it shows the cup holder liner is no longer available for the '14-'16 Silverado/Sierra center seat. Was unable to find any info on parts for the 2017 models. Going to stop in at a local dealer to check out a '17 out of curiosity.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Not a problem here in Lower Alabama. Yeti cups and clones thereof seem to be a birthright. God forbid a McDonald's cup should be seen in one's hand much less the Z-71 cup holder ! Just be sure to consistent with the placement of drink and spit cups ! Think before you drink !

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...