Jump to content

2014/2015 AFM oil usage?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Before my range AFM delete and 1st oil change at 3k miles, she hadn't used a drop. Given I'm in the hill country, V4 was CONSTANTLY turning on and off, probably as much as someone in the flat lands would experience within 5 times the miles I've gone. The darn V4/8 thing was like a blinker on my dash when I would watch it. I've also dumped a lot of crud out of my catch can and do every 400 miles. Still haven't seen a change in my oil level but I can't imagine the constant switching would have been good in the long run.

 

Interested to see others experience with higher miles.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

using/loosing about half a quart every 2000 miles. only use Mobil 1 0/20 full synthetic. my 2008 crew seemed to start using/loosing half a quart or more every 3000 miles with conventional oil. I use a range module to stop the afm, but now I am hearing a lot about it "throwing" codes. I can honestly say I am very confused about how many problems I am having with this truck for how much money it was. 5th brand new Chevy since 1996.

Posted

37,500 miles on my 2014 and I haven't noticed any consumption. I have been changing the oil around 7500 miles and the level on the dipstick is the same as when I filled it.

 

62,000 miles now and still no oil consumption.

Posted

I'm still a firm believer all this is centered around how well your rings seated during the break in period.

Posted

34,500 miles and no oil consumption issues. Someone said on here a month ago that this was a overwhelming problem with the 2014+ models, but based on the replies, it doesn't seem to be like with the previous gen.

Posted

34,500 miles and no oil consumption issues. Someone said on here a month ago that this was a overwhelming problem with the 2014+ models, but based on the replies, it doesn't seem to be like with the previous gen.

 

Yep! 36,000 miles and from day one have not had to add any oil between changes. Right on the mark every time.

Posted

34,500 miles and no oil consumption issues. Someone said on here a month ago that this was a overwhelming problem with the 2014+ models, but based on the replies, it doesn't seem to be like with the previous gen.

I've done a lot of Googling and the number of guys reporting oil consumption with 2014+ trucks is miniscule. Many were due to guys that weren't parkinng on a level surface when they pulled the dipstick (yes, really). Others later realized their crappy AC Delco filter was leaking. A few were probably legitimate issues but that's to be expected. There will always be a small percentage of engines that consume a little oil regardless of who made it. Toyota, Honda, Subaru, etc all have complaints about OC. Gm has sold nearly 2 million Silverados and Sierras since the 2014+ model came out, 60-70% of those being 1500's. There should hundreds if not thousands of guys reporting oil consumption.

 

 

Seems like word of mouth bs getting spread around. A guy that doesn't like GM trucks heard from his buddy that their cousin works at a dealer and the new 5.3's are burning oil. Suddenly it must be true and the rumor makes its way online.

  • 2 years later...
Posted

My 2014 Silverado truck uses about 1 quart of oil for every 2000 miles driven. Dealer told me this is acceptable. Dash light came on that oil level is low. Do not drive any longer until oil added. This was after 4700 miles. took 3 quarts of oil. I am working with the dealer to resolve this issue

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,959
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Matt Parker
    Newest Member
    Matt Parker
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 878 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...