Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Stupid question, but you don't have the composite bed do you? Maybe higher center of gravity with z71 package.

Posted

I'm betting it has to do with the pickup's spring package and/or payload rating. Wouldn't surprise me if all half tons came with that disclaimer.

 

A 3/4 ton is much better suited for having 2,000+ pounds in the bed.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Because the truck isn't engineered for it thats why .... But try it anyways,,, what do they know ?

Edited by govtech4
  • Like 1
Posted

Stupid question, but you don't have the composite bed do you? Maybe higher center of gravity with z71 package.

Not sure why you think a truck with the Z71 suspension would be higher than one with regular 4x4, or NHT, or Z85, or Z83. The difference is shock valving, that's it.

 

The answer is it's a 1500 1/2 ton pickup and it is unsafe, simple as that.

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

Like others said, it exceeds the payload of your truck!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

There's got to be more to it than that.

 

My 2006 GMC Sierra SLT K1500 1/2 ton X-cab Short Box 4x4 Z71 says it can take a camper and also a 5-th wheel. (Well, not at the same time, I guess.) Pages 4-70 thru 4-82 of the Owner's Manual give specs for trailers and include notation for 5-th wheels. Pages 4-59 thru 4-61 give specific instructions for campers. Attached is photo of glove-box label with specs for slide-in camper. Although admittedly a 759-pound camper isn't much.

 

My truck has the "heavy-duty" trailer package also, maybe that makes a difference - ?

post-54380-0-26520900-1429757674_thumb.jpg

post-54380-0-26520900-1429757674_thumb.jpg

post-54380-0-26520900-1429757674_thumb.jpg

post-54380-0-26520900-1429757674_thumb.jpg

Edited by 06pirate
Posted

As said, not enough payload and bed too short for those with the 5'6" bed. Those slide in campers can get pretty heavy when they are empty. By time you load them up and have that all sitting on your rear axle (mostly), your truck's suspension is going to close if not way over loaded.

Posted

Don't think they make a slide in camper that weighs 759 lbs max. Then when you load it up as 00Silverado4x4 stated, plus you and passengers getting in it.......

Posted

Why would his 2006 say he can put one in (albeit prohibitively small) and not is 2003? It sounds like they are both extended cab 4wd

Posted

Oh, heavy duty trailer package. That probably does make the difference. That would have also probably included the 3.73 axle, potentially. That also makes a difference. Finally, that 06 may have the slide-in camper prep package. That was one of the options if I recall correctly.

Posted

Oh, heavy duty trailer package. That probably does make the difference. That would have also probably included the 3.73 axle, potentially. That also makes a difference. Finally, that 06 may have the slide-in camper prep package. That was one of the options if I recall correctly.

That could be one reason for the difference from '03 to '06. Another reason could be that GM made several changes/upgrades on the '06 compared to the '03. I know they got more power out of the engine and some upgrades to the transmission as well.

Posted

BTW, just a side note, I have been looking into this myself, looks like the ones with no wood in the build are much lighter, they use modern composites and all aluminum frames, there is more than one company selling them, example: http://www.livinlite.com/6_8-overview.php

I already decided that you get more room and bang for your buck with a Travel Trailer, I really like the design of this one, BUT will need to win the lotto first :) : https://www.livinlite.com/camplite21bhs-overview.php

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...