Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here's my 2015 double cab ltz with a RC 2.5" leveling kit with rear blocks. Makes a ton of difference in the looks department I think. My 275/60R20 duratracs with fuel maverick 20x9 +01 offset are on the way! 45075bf321f98995ea59a2e562b32cec.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by 15ltzandy
Posted

Love this information. Z71 with 2" RC Level. Was wondering if I needed to adjust headlights, and this thread answered it for me. Thanks!

 

93bfd2b287ef08330bfc58ceaa9390cd.jpg

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

I finally got my Ranchos where I want them. 3 in front and 5 in the rear. I had put the front at 0 and it was like OEM ranchos. I jumped up to 3 and it rides great.

Posted

 

Its true Z71 has a higher rear, I was going to do 2.5 in the front and 1 in the back, however due to the z71 I only had to do the front

Where did you come up with that information?

 

The 4x4 pickups with the Z71 suspension sit at the same height as any other GM 4x4 truck that I have ever seen. The suspension differences between Z71, Z85, Z83, NHT ect. are mainly the stiffness of the OEM shocks. Shock length are all the same, but the shocks don't adjust ride height anyway.

 

All of the pickups also come with the same size rear block on top of the rear axel. The leaf springs are also the same measurements from center pin to eye with the same arch no matter the suspension package.

 

If any of the trucks actually were going to sit higher in the rear, common sense says it would be the options like the NHT/max tow that are rated for extra weight. Even if there would be more leafs in the pack to make it stiffer and give a higher spring rate to handle a heavier load, the truck still isn't lifted with the identical spring measurements.

The arch and measurements from center pin to eye are the same on the OEM leaf packs.

 

I am going to have to get some measurements next time a 14-15 Silverado/Sierra comes into the shop. The new trucks may be a little different but I doubt it. It would be very noticeable if one were higher than the other. Only difference I have seen are between 1500 & 2500.

 

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • 4 months later...
Posted

a8a8cf7f2ca794a39126c0643fa7f787.jpg

 

 

 

Top is leveled with RC 2.5"with toyo MTs, bottom is stock.

 

If you take care of your vehicle, you will be fine. Who cares if you need to replace ball joints in 100k miles, that's part if maintenance

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

That's probably what I'm about to do. Don't you have to swap rear blocks to get this leveled. I'll be working with a 2015 All Terrain and wanted about a 1/2"-3/4" rake?

Thanks

Posted

Ok I am really thinking about doing this and running 275/65/20 with the stock 2014 Denali rims. I know the tires are a 34 inch and a load range E which I was wanting to stay with a P metric tire just due to the weight and ride!

What are we getting with Gas mileage with the 275/65/20 E rated tires and a 2.5 lift kit or even the 3 inch Motofab kit ? I am going to stay with an AT tire and haven't decided which one yet either!

Either

Toyo Open Country AT2

Nitto Terra Grapler

BFG AT2

Yokohama ATS

Posted

Rancho Quick Lift if your budget allows......

What about Beilstein 5100. is that better them Rancho quick lift. or not.

Posted

I have a 3.5" level and I'm running a 35x12.5x20 destination m/t on a stock yukon rim

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

Who makes a 3.5" leveling kit? Are your angles alright?

  • 7 months later...
Posted

a8a8cf7f2ca794a39126c0643fa7f787.jpg

 

Top is leveled with RC 2.5"with toyo MTs, bottom is stock.

 

If you take care of your vehicle, you will be fine. Who cares if you need to replace ball joints in 100k miles, that's part if maintenance

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

You have probably answered this a thousand times so forgive me, but did you install the entire kit front a read? This is how I want my rig to look!!! Thanks!

Posted

rc 2.5 toyo 33x12.5x20 love it

photo%201_zpsasrdqufe.jpg

photo%202_zps0dayzmlp.jpg

photo%202_zps9snky2su.jpg

photo%201_zpsruww16hx.jpg

photo%201%203_zpsykfd5jmb.jpg

 

Looks awesome!! Did you install the entire kit front and rear?

Posted

 

Looks awesome!! Did you install the entire kit front and rear?

those pics are with just the front installed...i did install the 1" taller blocks on the rear a few days later...

it looked a little nose high in person...plus i tow a camper pretty often...

Posted

Before / Stock

e7698f52c2d91d3d40be0b34c18bde59.jpg

RC 2.5 Just the front with 275/60/20 ko2 6964ef42fe843c2e99d207b18bd60f2b.jpg

The hole kit front and rear

6d6c44a360dc1a367f26f07e65482a73.jpg

Posted

We have the same truck. I really like the looks of yours now. What tires do you have and are you happy with them? Do you have a photo showing your truck from the front with the air deflector removed?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...