Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I installed the rough country 2-1/2” lift on my 2015 Sierra when it was a month old and it now has 44,000 miles and no issues. Very happy with the kit, ride and ease of install. Yes I did it myself and then had a front end alignment. All is good. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 7/1/2015 at 8:45 AM, irish4life8911 said:

a8a8cf7f2ca794a39126c0643fa7f787.jpg

 

Top is leveled with RC 2.5"with toyo MTs, bottom is stock.

 

If you take care of your vehicle, you will be fine. Who cares if you need to replace ball joints in 100k miles, that's part if maintenance

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

What size tires did you end up going with? 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I know this is an old thread but I was wondering if I could get some advice, please excuse any stupid questions.

 

I am looking to install a level lift on my 2016 Silverado 1500 LT, I was thinking about either doing 3" front 2" back or 2.5" front and 1.5" back.  I am in the market on getting new wheels as well,  How big can I go without rubbing (33?)?  I tow a pontoon (~3000 lbs), does the level lift impact towing at all?  I still want to park in my garage, will I be able to fit with either of the lift combos along with the bigger tires (standard 2 car garage, 7 ft tall)?

 

I was looking at using the below:

https://www.amazon.com/MotoFab-Lifts-CH-3F-2R-2007-2017-Silverado/dp/B0156T83UI/ref=sr_1_6?s=automotive&ie=UTF8&qid=1518096723&vehicle=2016-47-491-------------0&sr=1-6&ymm=2016%3Achevrolet%3Asilverado+1500&keywords=2016+chevy+silverado+lift#customerReviews

Wheels - Hostile Sprocket (20") or XD Series XD820 (20")

 

I have been looking at a lot of different forums and it seems like everyone has their own opinions, just looking for some constructive criticism/advice.


Thanks in advance.

Funk

Posted
1 hour ago, Funk said:

I know this is an old thread but I was wondering if I could get some advice, please excuse any stupid questions.

 

I am looking to install a level lift on my 2016 Silverado 1500 LT, I was thinking about either doing 3" front 2" back or 2.5" front and 1.5" back.  I am in the market on getting new wheels as well,  How big can I go without rubbing (33?)?  I tow a pontoon (~3000 lbs), does the level lift impact towing at all?  I still want to park in my garage, will I be able to fit with either of the lift combos along with the bigger tires (standard 2 car garage, 7 ft tall)?

 

I was looking at using the below:

https://www.amazon.com/MotoFab-Lifts-CH-3F-2R-2007-2017-Silverado/dp/B0156T83UI/ref=sr_1_6?s=automotive&ie=UTF8&qid=1518096723&vehicle=2016-47-491-------------0&sr=1-6&ymm=2016%3Achevrolet%3Asilverado+1500&keywords=2016+chevy+silverado+lift#customerReviews

Wheels - Hostile Sprocket (20") or XD Series XD820 (20")

 

I have been looking at a lot of different forums and it seems like everyone has their own opinions, just looking for some constructive criticism/advice.


Thanks in advance.

Funk

Welcome to this forum.  You are correct that this is an older thread.  Try:

There are newer  threads as well.  I recommend you take the time and read about other members' experiences. You could save yourself some money and disappointment.   I have read much of the information on this topic in this forum and my conclusion was to either go with Bilstein 5100 shocks or 1.5" bottom strut mount spacers. (I chose the latter)  With a 1.5" level your truck will look great, accommodate larger tires and maintain some rake for towing.  The level lift you are proposing will result in a similar stance and be 1" higher but will likely give a harsher ride for passengers and prematurely wear other suspension components.  Many members claim many trouble free miles with the 2.5"+ level kits so the decision is yours.  However, you will find far less problems associated with a smaller level. 

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Just to add another perspective, this is my 2017 GMC Sierra 1500 with the ReadyLift 2.5” Level Kit and additional upper control arms. Product #66-3086

 

EE0692BA-E97E-470F-8105-E8EAEE1ADE06.jpeg

Posted
Rough Country also makes just a 2 inch as well. A shop I used to work for has installed countless Rough Country levels and had 0 issues. I run a RC 7 inch and have had 0 problems.


I did the RC 2inch on my 13 and really makes it sit much better. No issues related to ride or handling One hour install


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 10 months later...
Posted
On 7/1/2015 at 8:45 AM, irish4life8911 said:

a8a8cf7f2ca794a39126c0643fa7f787.jpg

 

Top is leveled with RC 2.5"with toyo MTs, bottom is stock.

 

If you take care of your vehicle, you will be fine. Who cares if you need to replace ball joints in 100k miles, that's part if maintenance

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Irish, are you using the 2” RC block in the rear, or just the upper and lower spacers on the front?  Truck looks good. 

  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, JD Longanecker said:

Do you need to install new upper control arms to help with geometry?

With a 2.5" level and under, you'll be OK. (my installer mentioned he wouldn't install any level with stock UCAs.)
If you go above that, it is highly recommended proper UCAs be installed.
I have a 3" front level, Motofab UCAs and a 1" rear block with Zone rear spring lift and a Zone 1.5" body lift.
35x12.5x18s without issues.
 

IMG_0148.jpg

Edited by MikeBMW
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a 2.25" level from procomp. No issues so far. Been 2 years and about 45k miles. Running 20x10 33x12.50x20 for my summer set and 17x9 280/70/17 for my snow set.

Snapchat-2010724932.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 764 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...