Jump to content

2500HD 6.0 First Tow


Recommended Posts

Posted

Bought a new car hauler last week, so loaded up the wife's Jeep and took a little Labor Day weekend road trip. This was the first time towing with my '15 6.0 2500. The new trailer weighs 3650lbs, and I'm guestimating the Jeep weighs 5500 or a little more. Total weight was probably between 9100lbs-9500lbs.

 

Overall, I'm happy with the truck's performance. The round trip was only around 240 miles, averaged exactly 9.0 mpg travelling between 60 and 70 on backroads, no Interstate.

 

I could definitely tell the difference between pulling with this truck and the Cummins powered trucks I've had before, but this one got the job done. We'll see how much I still like this truck after I pull this load out to Moab, Utah next year....

 

IMG_0616_zps46msh4sk.jpg

 

IMG_0618_zpsr3hzkp6n.jpg

 

IMG_0615_zpsgtqqqxwq.jpg

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Just curious.....why don't you get a tow bar and flat tow that Jeep 4 down? Save the weight of pulling the trailer.

Because some of the trails we run in our Jeeps can result in enough damage to render flat towing impractical. :)

 

clayton9_zps4fed0b6a.jpg

 

100_2019.jpg

Posted

Nice.

 

IMO, that seems like pretty good mileage. Wonders what other think.

 

I was expecting lower. Must be real flat.

Posted

Excellent to hear you're happy with that especially after coming from a higher powered vehicle.

 

You've got the exact setup I'm going for with my next truck. I love this 6.0 setup!

Posted

Nice set up there , that is a really heavy car hauler at 3640lbs. Wow my 20ft dove tail is around 2100-2200lbs, that s a beefy trailer for sure. Nice Jeep to.

Posted

Nice set up there , that is a really heavy car hauler at 3640lbs. Wow my 20ft dove tail is around 2100-2200lbs, that s a beefy trailer for sure. Nice Jeep to.

Thank you. The trailer is a PJ super wide. Made from 6" channel, two 7000lb axles. Beefy, but heavy.

Posted

I wasn't too impressed with my 2015 2500 with the 6.0. well let me rephrase that, the truck has enough power to tow, but there are a couple gears that are too far apart. when I climbed a steep grade towing, the truck would be excessively high in rpms and then when it would shift the rpms would drop too low to maintain speed. I had to back off the speed in the lower gear so it wasn't screaming so high. My f150 with the 5.4l did better on the steep grades. I pull a 28 foot travel trailer at roughly 8000 lbs loaded. another huge disappointment with the truck is the tow mirrors. it is too hard to see out of the passenger mirror. the large glass is too focused. it should be zoomed out a tad so you can see more especially for towing. also, that passenger mirror doesn't extend far enough out to see down the side of the trailer. another thing I noticed is the new style mirrors for whatever reason, the amber lights on the front don't blink for the turn signal. I don't know why they would do that. the truck has some cool features for sure, but I feel like they focused too much on that rather than making a better tow vehicle.

Posted

yeah, the tow mirrors pull out but not far enough I guess. The only other tow vehicles I've used have been a 2010 F150 and a few of my Dad's F250s and with those I could see right down the side of the trailer and the glass showed more of the surroundings. I've been pretty unhappy with the new truck. Having problems with it already and problems with the service dept which is where it's at now. Its been there over a week.

Posted

There is absolutely no way any 5.4 triton is out pulling a 6.0, even if it doesn't decide to shoot out the spark plugs. The 6.0 may not "feel" like it's pulling as well, but it is. The TFL guys were talking about how short on power and crappy it was, they seemed surprised when it clobbered the 6.4 hemi.

 

But I do prefer the super duty tow mirrors.

Posted

I wouldn't say the 5.4 out towed the 6.0. I'm pulling the same trailer I did with the f150 and they both pull good. I just never had the gearing issue with the f150 where there is a huge difference in the rpms from one gear to the next. you can see the issue im talking about in the tfl video with the 2500hd.

Posted

for anyone who's looking for towing mpgs, on my first tow I didn't exceed 50mph per the manual and I got 8.3mpg going up and 11 going back down. 250 miles round trip. pulling a 28 ft travel trailer at 8000 lbs loaded.

Posted

I wouldn't say the 5.4 out towed the 6.0. I'm pulling the same trailer I did with the f150 and they both pull good. I just never had the gearing issue with the f150 where there is a huge difference in the rpms from one gear to the next. you can see the issue im talking about in the tfl video with the 2500hd.

I see what you mean. In my limited 6.0/6speed towing experience, what worked best was locking it down to the lower gear and letting it spin high.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,726
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Ragg-Boy
    Newest Member
    Ragg-Boy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 959 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...