Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are the clusters on back order or just with Specmo? I called them today and they said that they were on backorder.

I have tried Specmo and my dealer has tried a couple other vendors that carry them and none have them and the part numbers have changed a lot

Posted (edited)

Just want you guys to know . GM have changed the color of the Sierra From Red to Silverado color. No more Red for Sierra.

The Denali cluster on the 17 is also have 8 speed available on the 5.3 and 6.2. Now Silverado owners can get the 17 Denali cluster to work without worry about the color. ;)

Edited by block8head
Posted

Just want you guys to know . GM have changed the color of the Sierra From Red to Silverado color. No more Red for Sierra.

The Denali cluster on the 17 is also have 8 speed available on the 5.3 and 6.2. Now Silverado owners can get the 17 Denali cluster to work without worry about the color. ;)

only if they have a 2017. They are still model year specific
Posted

No luck buying one here. Seller on eBay refused to give me a part number, would only sell according to my vin. May try the dealer on my next oil change.

 

 

Sent from my kayak

Posted

only if they have a 2017. They are still model year specific

Most of the 17 Sierra Denali i see have Blue cluster. I'm not talking about those SLT/SLE model. :D

Posted

No luck buying one here. Seller on eBay refused to give me a part number, would only sell according to my vin. May try the dealer on my next oil change.

 

 

Sent from my kayak

 

There is a seller who is erroneously selling 2014 clusters saying they fit 2014-2016 even though they have been told (by multiple customers they screwed) that they are model year specific; if its that "company" avoid like the plague.

 

Most of the 17 Sierra Denali i see have Blue cluster. I'm not talking about those SLT/SLE model. :D

 

I knew what you meant my concern was people with 14-15 Silverados were going to buy one and be pissed at us when they dont work properly LOL

  • Like 1
Posted

 

There is a seller who is erroneously selling 2014 clusters saying they fit 2014-2016 even though they have been told (by multiple customers they screwed) that they are model year specific; if its that "company" avoid like the plague.

After our emails I was turned off of eBay, unless I can get a specific part number that's for sale. I'd imagine it's the same seller, multiple listings for 14-16 clusters and some say color changing as well lol.

 

 

Sent from my kayak

Posted (edited)

After our emails I was turned off of eBay, unless I can get a specific part number that's for sale. I'd imagine it's the same seller, multiple listings for 14-16 clusters and some say color changing as well lol.

 

 

Sent from my kayak

 

 

Yeah a seller refusing to tell you the part number they are selling is pretty crazy, the color changing is also obviously not true hahaha

 

EDIT: We had a customer from the middle east who got conned and was PISSED that it wouldnt work properly in his 2016.... Even after we told him it would lose certain features he took it anyhow thinking what the seller told him was true and it would... nope lol

Edited by GTPprix
  • Like 2
Posted

Why are these so hard to come by, or why is GM making it hard? I was told by gm parts direct that they can't get the part and I will have to go through GM. Any luck with any dealers? Can they just sell you the cluster with out a VIN?

Posted

Why are these so hard to come by, or why is GM making it hard? I was told by gm parts direct that they can't get the part and I will have to go through GM. Any luck with any dealers? Can they just sell you the cluster with out a VIN?

I have tried through my dealer and no luck soo far. They dontbhave to have a VIN usually. GM has changed the part numbers a lot. But a note from what my dealer said is that GM will not direct ship to a dealer. It goes to an outside party just for clusters

Posted

I was looking at a dealer website and they have a Denali Cluster but not sure it will fit mine for a 2016 GMC Sierra SLT... the part number is 23433880. Let me know if it's fits, that way I can order it.

Posted

Please contact us from our website for compatibility checks, that whole conversation can take up a page here LOL HOWEVER no that is not a denali cluster its the normal color unit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...