Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Diver6 said:

Can you order these new? I'm looking for a 2016 red Canadian cluster these might be hard to find.

The red ones probably will be much more difficult to find...

Posted

Mine will be here tomm I can’t wait to get it installed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/16/2019 at 3:45 PM, Nitrousbird said:

You found a sucker, sucker, sucker at that price!  I paid $269 shipped for my brand new one last weekend.  Already went to WAMS and is installed/good to go.  That buyer paid the difference plus an additional $100 for programming a used unit!  Congrats to you, you got top dollar for sure.  

You also got a cluster for an 18. The 16’s are harder to find. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Gary Violette said:

You also got a cluster for an 18. The 16’s are harder to find. 

And that person was selling a '18 cluster.  So how does that not make my point 100% valid?  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Just installed my Denali Cluster all I can say is this was probably the best Mod to do ever even over the RSE. Chris thank you no words buddy amazing. Truly changed the whole look of the truck. Thank you again !!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/25/2019 at 6:30 PM, SS502 said:

Tell her you’re doing it so she can configure it to her tastes :D

Well damn...I bought one last night from eBay. The seller was offering 10% off and I had a $5 coupon, so I purchased the model listed as working for an 18 gas.  84385167   I might need to rent a room off is someone if my wife finds out. Ha 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Jaychevy81 said:

Just installed my Denali Cluster all I can say is this was probably the best Mod to do ever even over the RSE. Chris thank you no words buddy amazing. Truly changed the whole look of the truck. Thank you again !!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Forgive my ignorance...what is that? Rear Side Exhaust? I agree with you on the best Mod...it really makes the stock unit look almost primitive. When I bought the truck, I thought the stock unit was pretty nice (which it really is) until I saw this thread.

Posted
Forgive my ignorance...what is that? Rear Side Exhaust? I agree with you on the best Mod...it really makes the stock unit look almost primitive. When I bought the truck, I thought the stock unit was pretty nice (which it really is) until I saw this thread.

Sorry RSE is rear seat entertainment I agree stock was good but this just sets the interior off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Jaychevy81 said:


Sorry RSE is rear seat entertainment I agree stock was good but this just sets the interior off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Boy was I way off LOL....yes it does and to me it looks much better than the 2019 :thumbs:

Edited by SS502
Posted
2 minutes ago, Viktorrocks15 said:

@bigjoshE


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What????????

Posted

My bad guys.. lol. A friend of mine just joined the forum and wanted info on the Denali retrofit and obviously has join yet. Smh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...