Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I Have a '17 SLT 6.2 Max, MSRP was 58,900, paid $52,000

My mother just got a '17 Denali ultimate, $64,200 (I negotiated for her) paid $52,200

The only thing I actually like better on hers is the look of the seats (sit the same), and the dash.

 

The MRC and LED lamps are not an improvement to me (mine has intellabeams with HID)

The LCD dash is sweet!!

The power board are slick, but for NY salt............Mom lives in Fla.

Both have sunroof

I have the lane assist and auto braking, so there is next to no difference in equipment.

 

So i believe my ride is about as close to Denali as you can get, which is what I wanted as I desired Max Tow not MRC.

Edited by powerhaulic
Posted

Ok, our SLT doesn't have the 6.2, moonroof, or auto running boards, we have the 5.3. with fixed running boards but we do have everything else, ours is the off-road package with 22" wheels and 9,000 lb towing capacity.

 

I am just chuckling at the Offroad package and 22" wheels.

 

I picked the SLT over the Denali as it was ~5k difference for me and the additional features just didn't do it for me. Wasn't super impressed with MagRide personally.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I am just chuckling at the Offroad package and 22" wheels.

 

I picked the SLT over the Denali as it was ~5k difference for me and the additional features just didn't do it for me. Wasn't super impressed with MagRide personally.

The other thing that made me giggle is every Ultimate i looked at had $200 upgrade(?) to more aggressive tires. make the Michelin Premiers std. on that level of truck..........

Posted

If I wanted a base or a LT or SLE or SLT or whatever truck I would have bought that. My 2009 SLT 5.3 was a good truck except for a oil burning issue. My 2014 SLT 5.3 was a good truck and I liked it. My 2016 was a Denali 6.2 and it was very enjoyable but this 2017 Ultimate can only be described as AWESOME LOL. All in what you like and what coin you have to throw away on a new truck. Always going to be something nicer but like I say get what you like if you can afford it, who really cares what other think about your choice? If you like it, I like it. As far as the difference between the SLT and Denali it is more styling than substance. lots of people hate the Denali grille/Denali dash/TriFold side steps/Denali HD leather with custom stitching/LED headlights/Magnetic ride control/factory spray in bedliner with Denali logo at front of bed/6.2 engine with 8spd trans that gets over 20 mpg/sunroof/22" ultimate wheels/ and the Denali theme song. LOL I hope that i never see another stone metallic blue ultimate in my area. I get sick of looking at this thing (lying)

post-127028-0-24690100-1395103401_thumb.jpg
post-127028-0-21756000-1483288873_thumb.jpg
post-127028-0-95932200-1474764556_thumb.jpg
post-127028-0-22576000-1496016490_thumb.jpg
post-127028-0-75671800-1497492404_thumb.jpg

 

post-127028-0-24690100-1395103401_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-95932200-1474764556_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-21756000-1483288873_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-75671800-1497492404_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-24690100-1395103401_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-95932200-1474764556_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-21756000-1483288873_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-75671800-1497492404_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-24690100-1395103401_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-95932200-1474764556_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-21756000-1483288873_thumb.jpg

post-127028-0-75671800-1497492404_thumb.jpg

Posted

Denali has Burnished Color interior, im in the process of swapping out my silver if anyone wants to help me out with part numbers for the middle section around the radio, all the part numbers say without heated seats...

Posted

I have an SLT "Premium Plus" (so-called) which, it is my understanding, is essentially as loaded a truck as you can get short of the "Denali-Only" features.

 

AS indicated above, once you are in a Premium Plus, the list of features different between the two has shrunk considerably.

 

I believe the biggest hitters were the magnetic ride, the upgraded Denali seating, the digital gauge cluster, a different looking grill, and, maybe a few additional smaller items. At the time I purchased mine, I didn't find myself in an incentive-rich environment, and the cost difference between the premium plus and Denali was more than I was comfortable with versus what "more" I would actually get for the extra money.

 

And, of course, mine is a 5.3 8-speed versus the 6.2 8-speed.

 

Personally (and I say this without having any experience with 6.2l, which is probably an obscene rocket, given that the 5.3 is no slouch itself), I am extremely pleased with my truck and like it very much. AS I am one of the folks that uses my truck as a car 95% of the time, and a truck 5% of the time, I felt the 6.2 was overkill for me, but, in the premium plus, I got all of the blinky-blinky-lights and buttons I wanted, and, really don't miss the other stuff. The digital dash would have been cool, to be sure, but knowing myself, I probably would have delightfully played with it for a few months, then set it up a certain way and probably never messed with it again (just my nature).

 

Not sure if this clarifies anything more, but that's my $0.05.

 

BTW, glad you are liking your truck.

Posted

I struggled with the very same question last year.....decided that the Denali had just a few too many options I didn't want for an extra 10k. I ended up building my own SLT premium plus (package adds 7 speaker Bose with sub, running boards and 20" wheels).....the SLT comes with just about every other option and I added the 6.2L and 8 speed. Msrp was 54 and I think I only don't have sunroof, retractable running boards and MRC.

Posted

I have the denali....it's nothing more than a name and mrc. Coming from a tahoe, I really don't notice the suspension being that much better, but it's there. It operates like a suspension. I think I've said it before, I bought it because I've always wanted a black on black denali. Since they first came out. I just so happened to be in a position to purchase one at a decent price when I was in the market for a new vehicle. I think the SLT decked out is just as nice. Hell, the lower trim trucks are leaps and bounds nicer than my first truck...I'm sure most of us are driving a truck that is nicer than our first truck regardless of the trim levels.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

...I'm sure most of us are driving a truck that is nicer than our first truck regardless of the trim levels.

 

Boy, no kidding on that statement.

 

When I think back, my first new truck I ever had was a '91 F150 XLT Lariat (RC/LB), the nicest one you could get at the time, My '16 Sierra Premium Plus makes that '91 F150 look no better than a work truck now-a-days, even though "back in the day" the Lariat was considered a pretty plush for a truck....

 

It had the real fake wood trim around the (almost perfectly square) center stack... LOL :lol: and a PLUSH, I say PLUSH, cloth velour-like bench seat with a (wait for it) FOLD DOWN ARM REST.... who-da-thunk.... :P

 

On another note, it DID have one thing that is a thing of the past.... It had Dual Tanks on it, LOVED IT. 40 gal total fuel capacity. Wish I could still get that today. Only thing I really miss...

Edited by Grumpy Aero Guy
Posted

Yes, the 6.2 is a rocketship if you're burning 93. Need to factor in the 30-50c/gal premium for premium fuel.

 

The SLT All-Terrain package is where I'd want to be in a truck - with the 5.3.

Posted

 

I am just chuckling at the Offroad package and 22" wheels.

 

I picked the SLT over the Denali as it was ~5k difference for me and the additional features just didn't do it for me. Wasn't super impressed with MagRide personally.

 

It was purchased used with 12k already on it. I'm not too concerned with the decision the original owner made, It also has the chrome package and we got it for a steal. This truck is awesome and awesome looking.

Posted

 

Boy, no kidding on that statement.

 

When I think back, my first new truck I ever had was a '91 F150 XLT Lariat (RC/LB), the nicest one you could get at the time, My '16 Sierra Premium Plus makes that '91 F150 look no better than a work truck now-a-days, even though "back in the day" the Lariat was considered a pretty plush for a truck....

 

It had the real fake wood trim around the (almost perfectly square) center stack... LOL :lol: and a PLUSH, I say PLUSH, cloth velour-like bench seat with a (wait for it) FOLD DOWN ARM REST.... who-da-thunk.... :P

 

On another note, it DID have one thing that is a thing of the past.... It had Dual Tanks on it, LOVED IT. 40 gal total fuel capacity. Wish I could still get that today. Only thing I really miss...

 

We bought ours used, it's also a 16, the salesman said, "your're really going to like this, I think it's an 8 speed too". He didn't know because we bought it from a dealership called "Carsense", they buy up off lease vehicles and resell them, most of the sales guys don't have any clue what they're selling. How would I know if this is an 8 speed, there's nothing in the manuals.

Posted (edited)

 

We bought ours used, it's also a 16, the salesman said, "your're really going to like this, I think it's an 8 speed too". He didn't know because we bought it from a dealership called "Carsense", they buy up off lease vehicles and resell them, most of the sales guys don't have any clue what they're selling. How would I know if this is an 8 speed, there's nothing in the manuals.

Put the drive selector in M, then you can put it in m1, m2, m3, m4, etc with the +/- buttons on the shifter.

 

If it goes past 6, you have an 8 speed

 

When in M mode, it just means whatever gear you select is the highest gear it will go in. It's not like typical +/- paddle shifter that will shift on demand like a wanna-be sequential

Edited by truckguy82
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,046 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...