Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Put the drive selector in M, then you can put it in m1, m2, m3, m4, etc with the +/- buttons on the shifter.

 

If it goes past 6, you have an 8 speed

 

When in M mode, it just means whatever gear you select is the highest gear it will go in. It's not like typical +/- paddle shifter that will shift on demand like a wanna-be sequential

 

Gotcha, never thought of that, thanks for the suggestion. All of my last three trucks have had auto shift. I tinkered with that locally around town shortly after we bought it but didn't get past 3rd before I decided to put it back in drive. I'll try that on the way home from work, (turnpike driving).

Posted

 

It was purchased used with 12k already on it. I'm not too concerned with the decision the original owner made, It also has the chrome package and we got it for a steal. This truck is awesome and awesome looking.

 

It is a good looking truck - looks very similar to mine except it is white :)

 

 

On another note, it DID have one thing that is a thing of the past.... It had Dual Tanks on it, LOVED IT. 40 gal total fuel capacity. Wish I could still get that today. Only thing I really miss...

 

Was looking at Tundra's the other day when buying the lady a Camry and they had a 38 gallon tank listed. I had a 33 or 34 gallon tank on my last truck (Titan) and loved it as well. I am not sure why that isn't a more popular option.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

It is a good looking truck - looks very similar to mine except it is white :)

 

 

Was looking at Tundra's the other day when buying the lady a Camry and they had a 38 gallon tank listed. I had a 33 or 34 gallon tank on my last truck (Titan) and loved it as well. I am not sure why that isn't a more popular option.

 

I see you have K&N Intake on your signature. Any chance you can post a video of starting up the truck and engine rev? I've been debating the K&N for two reasons. On my wife's side of the fam, Her brother, uncle and cousin, (uncles son) all have Silverado's and they all installed the K&N cold air intake. They said it helps with gas mileage and suggested I should get it as well, because it also sounds really good too. Does it change the sound that much?

Posted

 

We bought ours used, it's also a 16, the salesman said, "your're really going to like this, I think it's an 8 speed too". He didn't know because we bought it from a dealership called "Carsense", they buy up off lease vehicles and resell them, most of the sales guys don't have any clue what they're selling. How would I know if this is an 8 speed, there's nothing in the manuals.

You could also verify which transmission on the glove box RPO label.

 

MYC is the 6 speed

M5U is the 8 speed

 

I

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

AN3 seats on SLT are 10 way

AN3 seats on Denali are 12 way (which are not available on SLT)

Edited by redwngr
Posted

AN3 seats on SLT are 10 way

AN3 seats on Denali are 12 way (which are not available on SLT)

what is the added adjustment on 12 way ?

Posted (edited)

AN3 seats on SLT are 10 way

AN3 seats on Denali are 12 way (which are not available on SLT)

 

It's 8 speed, got on the turnpike on the way home yesterday and tested.

 

So now that I know I have a question about our camper. We have a 33' camper which in the past truck, (Ram) we averaged 9 miles per gallon hitched up with tow control enabled. Which is better, using the auto shift or just leave it in drive?

 

And for what it's worth the cab is huge. The back windows are the same size as the front. I'm 6' tall and can practically stretch out.

Edited by jernatety
Posted (edited)

 

 

On my wife's side of the fam, Her brother, uncle and cousin, (uncles son) all have Silverado's and they all installed the K&N cold air intake. They said it helps with gas mileage and suggested I should get it as well, because it also sounds really good too. Does it change the sound that much?

I believe I got better MPGs because I need to justify my silly purchase. You CAN'T gain mileage in a computer controlled system by changing the filter. More air = more horsepower = more fuel.

 

Effect of Intake Air Filter Condition on Vehicle Fuel Economy

 

 

 

Results show that clogging the air filter has no significant effect on the fuel economy of the newer vehicles (all fuel injected with closed-loop control and one equipped with MDS). The engine control systems were able to maintain the desired AFR regardless of intake restrictions, and therefore fuel consumption was not increased. The carbureted engine did show a decrease in fuel economy with increasing restriction. However, the level of restriction required to cause a substantial (10–15%) decrease in fuel economy (such as that cited in the literature3,4 ) was so severe that the vehicle was almost undrivable. Acceleration performance on all vehicles was improved with a clean air filter.

Edited by elcamino
Posted

There's quite a few differences, there's a list running around here somewhere if you do a search. If you negotiate well you can get a Denali for a similar (sometimes better) price

Posted

 

Was looking at Tundra's the other day when buying the lady a Camry and they had a 38 gallon tank listed. I had a 33 or 34 gallon tank on my last truck (Titan) and loved it as well. I am not sure why that isn't a more popular option.

 

Well, i must admit that fuel economy in trucks has improved quite a bit since my '91 F150 (had the 302 V8). I remember folks asking what mileage I was getting with that truck. I used to answer 13mpg. They would then ask City or highway?... and I would answer "correct".

 

My Sierra gets 16-17 all day long in suburban driving and 21+ on the highway. That adds up on range.

 

Most American manufacturers will size the tank for approx 400 miles range in the city. Doing the math on my truck, 400/16=25, and, hence a 26 gal tank.

 

I am with you, though, if there was a choice of a larger tank, I would have "bought on" for sure.

Posted

I think a 30 gallon tank wouk be about right. I think people forget gas weighs a lot so adding bigger tanks means more weight, thus less mpgs. Also many gas stations here limit each fuel purchase to 30 gallons.

Posted

I think a 30 gallon tank wouk be about right. I think people forget gas weighs a lot so adding bigger tanks means more weight, thus less mpgs. Also many gas stations here limit each fuel purchase to 30 gallons.

Gas weighs 7 lbs per gallon, give or take. An extra 4 gallons (26 to a 30 gallon tank) would only be an additional 28 lbs. An extra 28 lbs on a 5500 lb truck that has a 1500lb payload capacity, you will never notice.

Posted

Hence why i said 30 pounds versus our 26 gallon. Go to 34 gallons, now you're running what would be sand tubes in the bed of your truck.

 

 

Gas weighs 7 lbs per gallon, give or take. An extra 4 gallons (26 to a 30 gallon tank) would only be an additional 28 lbs. An extra 28 lbs on a 5500 lb truck that has a 1500lb payload capacity, you will never notice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,762
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Chris80s
    Newest Member
    Chris80s
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 827 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...