Jump to content

Change Fluid.. Or Leave Alone?


Recommended Posts

I have a 2000 Silverado with 250K. Just got the truck not long ago, so don't know any of the history. Anyway,  I was changing all the fluids and wondering if I should change the transmission fluid. The fluid is defiantly brownish red and needs to changed, but I have heard stories of folks messing with this and actually causing problems. Especially when doing a full "flush"  ...as for me I was thinking of just dropping the pan and changing that fluid with filter.  The trans works / shifts like butter now.. it's perfect.  The truck is just a farm truck now, only driven about 3K per year.. no towing or even much high speeds for that matter. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dcheeseman said:

I'd do a pan drop, replace the filter, clean the pan out well as well as the magnet.  Use a high mileage dexron 3 transmission fluid (Example: Valvoline Maxlife).

 

Daniel 

This.  Change it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have looked into this matter very thoroughly on multiple occasions over the years. 

 

Benefits of changing the fluid: 

 

1) The transmission MIGHT last longer with new fluid. 

 

 

Disadvantages of changing the fluid: 

 

1) Transmission might fail immediately, or sometime over the next year. 

 

 

To me its just not worth the risk. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.  I have talked to many transmission shops about it, and they all said the same thing:

 

    If you know the service history on the trans fluid, and you know for sure that it was changed regularly - then keep changing it. If you don't know the history on the transmission, then LEAVE IT ALONE.

 

 Problem #1: As the fluid gets old, the detergent stops working. Crud builds up on the inside parts. When you introduce new fluid, it loosens that crud up and it clogs the valve body. 

 

 Problem #2: If there are seals inside the transmission that are not sealing very well, the leaks get clogged by crud. New detergent in the fluid washes the crud away and the seal fails. 

 

 Problem #3: The new fluid will be more slippery than the old fluid, so if you clutches are weak at all, then you just caused the transmission to fail by replacing the fluid. 

 

 Problem #4: It was working just fine..... until you messed with it.......

 

 

 

Many people will agree with this. Many will not agree with this. There is no correct answer. I highly advise that you just leave well enough alone and drive it. 

   

Edited by starman8tdc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends what you have into the truck.  Transmission sounds like it hasnt been maintained properly so it probably doesnt have much time left.  Leaving it alone will most likely give you the longest life possible.  And take it easy on it.  
Start saving for a new one.  Put the money from the fluid and filter into that.  If you change it you have the potential to lost 3 and 4th gear because of the lack of friction material in the old fluid.  Once its dirty in a worn transmission,it can be the only thing letting it shift.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own a 2002 and a 2003 Suburban. One has fluid that is brown, and clearly worn out. The other has fluid that is pink and looks pretty good. Both transmissions work perfectly. I have no intention of changing either fluid EVER. I have never had a transmission fail that had old fluid in it. I have had several fail with newer fluid in them. Change it, don't change it. - do what makes you happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Zoomie said:

I had a 1999 Chevy Lumina with a 3.5 or something v6. After a ton of miles and years, the overdrive started slipping in and out on the highway. The "experts" said, "nothing you can do, just wait for it to fail". I decided to change the fluid, and it started working perfectly again. Kept it for a couple more years and still sold it for $900. Great car and I'm into maintenance so I say change it. IMHO. 

3.1L, or 3.8L for those years.  And those luminas were great cars.  Only thing you had to worry about was the head gasket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always really liked the 3.1liter. I had a 2.8 in a 1989 Z24 that broke a crank shaft ( my fault for always hot rodding it) so I dropped a 1994 3.1 in it. Mostly plug and play too.
What a torquey engine and for a v6 they had a great exhaust note.
I learned to tear that engine down in the driveway ( the top end of the engine) replace heads, etc and have it ready for cruising a few hours later. The good old days.

3.1L, or 3.8L for those years.  And those luminas were great cars.  Only thing you had to worry about was the head gasket. 


Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.