Jump to content

2018 Silverado 1500 External Transmission Cooler?

BillNC

By BillNC
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

BillNC Enthusiast

BillNC

Posted
Posted

I am trying to determine if the new 2018 Silverado Crew 1500 that we just bought for towing a horse trailer has:

      (1) A  transmission fluid cooler that is an integral part of the radiator, AND

     (2) An auxiliary transmission cooler that is located in the top of the AC condenser.

Based on the Build Report and the GM Order Guide, and the thread I found here from 2014 or 2015, I believe that the truck has both the items above.  But the service manager just emailed me back and said that the truck does not have (1) but does have (2).

 

Build Report reads: "KNP - Transmission Oil Cooler"

 

http://gmauthority.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2018-Chevrolet-Silverado-1500-SSV-Order-Guide.pdf

 

The info below is cut and pasted from the above GM document.

 

"KC4 Cooling, external engine oil cooler S S"

 

"KNP Cooling, auxiliary external transmission oil cooler S S"

 

"L83 Engine, 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 with Active Fuel Management, Direct Injection and Variable

Valve Timing, includes aluminum block construction (355 hp [265 kW] @ 5600 rpm,

383 lb-ft of torque [518 Nm] @ 4100 rpm; more than 300 lb-ft of torque from 2000 to

5600 rpm)"

 

Your help sorting this out would be greatly appreciated,

 

Thanks,

 

BillNC

 

 

 

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

Shine a flashlight in and look at the condenser.  If the top 7-8 rows have thicker plates than the rest, that's the external air/oil tranny cooler.  You can also trace the lines to that area (one goes in on one side, one comes out the other side).  Your 5.3 should have it.

mjm-1957 Enthusiast

mjm-1957

Posted
Posted

Why would you buy a 1500 to tow a horse trailer?You should have stepped up and got a real truck,2500 or 3500.

BillNC Enthusiast

BillNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
26 minutes ago, Jon A said:

Shine a flashlight in and look at the condenser.  If the top 7-8 rows have thicker plates than the rest, that's the external air/oil tranny cooler.  You can also trace the lines to that area (one goes in on one side, one comes out the other side).  Your 5.3 should have it.

Thanks.  I'll do that.  Was the service manager right when she said that the truck did not also have a transmission cooler built into the radiator?

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

No, your truck should have both.  The fluid line from the tranny goes to the radiator tank on the driver's side, back out the radiator tank on the driver's side and into the A/C condenser also on the driver's side.  It then goes out of the A/C condenser on the pass side and back to the tranny.

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mjm-1957 said:

Why would you buy a 1500 to tow a horse trailer?You should have stepped up and got a real truck,2500 or 3500.

Why assume he needs a 2500 before you know how big the trailer is?  For all you know it's a tiny single-horse....

 

Mine does just fine up to four horses:

 

IMAG0362.jpg

 

 

For a trailer like the brown one, of course:

 

 

IMAG0368.jpg

 

 

Then yes, wrong tool for the job.

BillNC Enthusiast

BillNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Jon A said:

Why assume he needs a 2500 before you know how big the trailer is?  For all you know it's a tiny single-horse....

 

Mine does just fine up to four horses:

 

IMAG0362.jpg

 

 

For a trailer like the brown one, of course:

 

 

IMAG0368.jpg

 

 

Then yes, wrong tool for the job.

Two horse with dressing room.  5,850 lbs with one warmblood. Load equalizing hitch.  Absolute max that would ever be towed would be 7,500 lbs.  Truck is rated for 9,300 lbs.   My wife towed this same trailer for 12 years with a F-150 rated at 8,500 lbs.

Edited by BillNC
BillNC Enthusiast

BillNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Jon A said:

No, your truck should have both.  The fluid line from the tranny goes to the radiator tank on the driver's side, back out the radiator tank on the driver's side and into the A/C condenser also on the driver's side.  It then goes out of the A/C condenser on the pass side and back to the tranny.

I was thinking it should have both too.

 

Looking through the grill, I did not see thicker plates at the top of the condenser. 

 

I've crawled under the truck and traced the engine oil lines and the transmission fluid lines.  (Also wiped the oil off the bottom of the oil filter and tightened it by hand.)

 

Engine oil lines run down the left side of the engine and tie into the radiator high and low on the right side.

 

Freon lines tie into the condenser on the right side.  Condenser appears to be the same size as the radiators.

 

Transmission fluid lines run down the right side of the engine and tie into the right side of the condenser high, and the left side of the condenser high.

 

I double checked this as best I could and I think the above is accurate.  It's hard to see around all the cowling, etc. 

 

The engine oil is routed through the radiator.  Maybe the condenser was upsized???

 

I'm going to ask the dealer for a link to an exploded parts diagram for my truck as built.

 

Many thanks!

 

Edited by BillNC
Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

That's interesting.  If there are no lines going into the driver's side radiator tank then there must not be a heat exchanger there.  I wonder if they eliminated it on newer models?  If so, that's a good thing IMHO.  It was a dumb design to begin with as that's the hot tank of the radiator and will act as a heater instead of a cooler about 95% of the time anyway.  I have seen people with the newest trucks report cooler trans temps when towing than mine could ever maintain when stock, maybe that's the reason.  I'm currently running with mine bypassed and like it better that way, so if your truck doesn't have that don't worry about it, it's no big loss.

 

If you've traced the lines to the condenser, you definitely have the air/oil cooler, which is the important one so you should be good to go.  Seeing the thicker plates (the part of the rows between the fins) is subtle, and not easy to notice unless you know what you're looking for.

BillNC Enthusiast

BillNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

2018 Silverado 1500 Engine Oil Cooler Lines.pdf

 

2018 Silverado Transmission Fluid Cooler Lines.pdf

 

Over the weekend I visited gmpartsguys.com (they are also a dealership) to look for a GM auxiliary transmission cooler for our truck.  I could not find one, so I emailed them the VIN number and the Build Sheet info.  They just called me back and told me that I already had an auxiliary transmission fluid cooler.  I explained that these parts drawings showed otherwise.  He said he would call GM and then call me back. 

 

He called back and told me that GM said: My truck is not built with an auxiliary transmission cooler, and none are available.

 

Kudos to gmpartsguys!

 

Edited by BillNC
  • Thanks 1
Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted
On 8/12/2018 at 5:17 AM, BillNC said:

The top 7 horizontal bars in the condenser are thicker than the ones below.  Missed that before.

Yup, that IS your auxiliary cooler.  It's actually quite big for a 1500.  You have the best transmission cooling available on these trucks.  You'll be fine.  If you find you want even cooler temps, bypassing/replacing the thermostat with an aftermarket unit makes a big difference and tuning the fans to come on earlier helps as well, especially at low speeds but I doubt you'll find any of that necessary with a trailer that size.  Is most of your towing on the highway or is a lot of it on slow gravel roads, etc?

 

Thanks for posting that parts diagram.  I did not know they did that.  It's likely the main reason some users of newer trucks have reported better performance (cooler transmission temps) than the older ones.  If I had posted my rants on how dumb it was for GM to put an in-tank heat exchanger in the hot side of the radiator a couple of years ago, I might accuse GM of listening to me.    :lol:    Again, so there's no confusion, it's no loss.  I have mine bypassed and the trans runs cooler for it.  In all but very rare conditions, that radiator tank exchanger acts as a heater, not a cooler.  And since we have a thermostat, the heating function is worthless at warmup anyway making it pretty much worthless all the time.

  • Thanks 2
Doublebase Enthusiast

Doublebase

Posted
Posted

Wait a second...GM uses the upper portion of the condenser as the transmission cooler and the side tank of the radiator as the oil cooler? I don't think I've ever heard of a setup like this. Did GM ever do this before 2014?

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yes.  2014 is the first year as far as I know, at least with the trucks.  If interested in the science behind it, SAE-2003-01-0529 (  https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2003-01-0529/  ) has good analysis/test results.  In short, using a combo cooler is a more efficient way of doing it.  Placing the transmission cooler in front of the condenser adversely impacts A/C performance, so manufacturers tend to make them small on light duty vehicles which will obviously affect transmission cooling performance.  This way, you end up with a trans cooler that's something like 5"X26" which is pretty huge for a 1/2 ton and it doesn't kill the A/C.

Edited by Jon A
  • Thanks 1
BillNC Enthusiast

BillNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Jon, thanks for your help with this!  My wife will be turning the transmission temp display on every time she tows.  All blacktop.  No mountains.  Occasional trip from NC to Fla on I-95.  She towed on back roads yesterday, about 12 miles each way and the highest temp was 197.

 

How does one tune the cooling fans?

 

Mike, the sales manager investigated the build a truck tool for the 2018 Silverado 1500.  Apparently the transmission cooler in the condenser and the engine oil cooler in the radiator comes along with the 5.3 engine.  If you look at the parts listings that I posted, it shows the same parts for 2017 and 2018.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • asilverblazer
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • PunchT37
      Oil Consumption

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...