Jump to content

White Smoke on startup


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey everyone just wanted to see if anyone has experienced white smoke on startup (like in the mornings). The truck has about 2500 miles on it. Need to see if this is an issue so I can give a laundry list to the dealer to look at

1. trans is jumpy

2. little bit of chevy shake

3. steering wheel is off center

 

Just seems like it rides like crap. For a 48k vehicle  you would think it would ride better. Hell my 6 inch lifted Duramax on 35's rode 10x better. Oh well let me know what you think

Posted

I can see some smoke only during cool mornings with my 2016.  It typically goes away rather quick but I do notice it and haven't batted an eye.  I think it is completely normal for mine anyway. As far as the transmission there is definitely a learning period.  I noticed mine clear up for the most part within a few thousand miles from buying it new.  If you are experiencing jerky downshifts when slowing that may never go away.  (this is what mine is doing).  No chevy shake on mine, I can go 80 and its very smooth, they may road balance your tires to start but some people claim the drive shaft is out of round causing their shake at higher speeds.  

 

 

 

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, contenderv07 said:

Hey everyone just wanted to see if anyone has experienced white smoke on startup (like in the mornings). The truck has about 2500 miles on it. Need to see if this is an issue so I can give a laundry list to the dealer to look at

1. trans is jumpy

2. little bit of chevy shake

3. steering wheel is off center

 

Just seems like it rides like crap. For a 48k vehicle  you would think it would ride better. Hell my 6 inch lifted Duramax on 35's rode 10x better. Oh well let me know what you think

They do ride like crap.  If you have the “Z71” package, it’s the most jarring, unforgiving, crap ride out there in the pickup world right now.  Everyone has an opinion about suspensions, and my opinion is GM needs to up their game on ride quality.  I agree with you, the 3/4 tons ride better than the 1/2 ton z71.

Posted

 

1 hour ago, contenderv07 said:

For a 48k vehicle  you would think it would ride better.

 

The retail price of a product reflects the profit margin more so than the final quality of the product. 

 

Example: 

 

Fish eggs fishing bait - VS - Caviar 

Nike Shoes - VS - Shoes for Crews 

1st class ticks - VS - Coach seats 

 

 

I agree that for $50K you would expect the rig to be perfect, but that is just not the case with most things.

 

Most companies work like this: 

 

Step 1) Lower production costs 

Step 2) Sell more units 

Step 3) Raise the retail price 

 

They have many many people working in each of these departments. Millions are invested to achieve each goal. 

 

The customer being happy is not a relevant issue unless it is required to achieve the goals. For instance, its far more important to sell you the product than it is to make you happy with your purchase. This is the case with ALL products, not just food, shoes, cars, houses, etc. 

 

 

Services are different. Cable TV and cell phone companies MUST maintain customer satisfaction to keep the profits up. The ONLY reason that these companies care about customer satisfaction is because its a required part of the business. If all of the cell phone customers would keep paying their bill even if the phone did not function, then the cell towers would be taken down and all of the employees would be in the billing department. There would be no tech support and none of the phones would ever work. 

 

Companies do what ever it takes to make the most amount of money. Sounds like a reasonable business plan to me. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Brianibew said:

They do ride like crap.  If you have the “Z71” package, it’s the most jarring, unforgiving, crap ride out there in the pickup world right now.  Everyone has an opinion about suspensions, and my opinion is GM needs to up their game on ride quality.  I agree with you, the 3/4 tons ride better than the 1/2 ton z71.

I've got the All Terrain package on mine. I think what I may do first is get the driveshaft checked. The trans issue I can KIND of deal with but still.. It sucks to have to dump money in to a brand new truck (possibly new tires, getting driveshaft checked out, alignment from NON- gmc place). Its funny though, I rode in a RAM before this and it rode like a dream. If I can't get these issues resolved, I might be heading that way

Posted
1 hour ago, contenderv07 said:

Hey everyone just wanted to see if anyone has experienced white smoke on startup (like in the mornings). The truck has about 2500 miles on it.

White smoke at startup is usually a sign of oil leaking past the valve guide seals.  It used to be a big issue on 80's and 90's chevy's that had 100K+ miles.  On them, the seals would break down from the heat cycles over the years and start leaking. 

 

I'd be concerned if I was seeing it already on a 2500 mile engine.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Darmichar said:

White smoke at startup is usually a sign of oil leaking past the valve guide seals.  It used to be a big issue on 80's and 90's chevy's that had 100K+ miles.  On them, the seals would break down from the heat cycles over the years and start leaking. 

 

I'd be concerned if I was seeing it already on a 2500 mile engine.

damn, so if I drive it around, park it, then come out and does nothing, it should be ok?? I guess I need to watch it a little more carefully on when it comes out(like just in the mornings or all of the time). Maybe lemon law comes in to effect here lol

Posted
9 minutes ago, Darmichar said:

White smoke at startup is usually a sign of oil leaking past the valve guide seals.

 

He might be right, but I think the white smoke is just condensation that has built up due to the temperature difference in the exhaust system. 

 

Burning oil is usually blue. 

 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, contenderv07 said:

damn, so if I drive it around, park it, then come out and does nothing, it should be ok?? I guess I need to watch it a little more carefully on when it comes out(like just in the mornings or all of the time). Maybe lemon law comes in to effect here lol

It's usually a 'first start of the morning after sitting all night' thing.  We're talking trace amounts of oil seeping around the valve stems.  It was common on older trucks, more of a nuisance and required the removal of the valve springs to replace the seals so most people just lived with it.

Posted
37 minutes ago, contenderv07 said:

I've got the All Terrain package on mine. I think what I may do first is get the driveshaft checked. The trans issue I can KIND of deal with but still.. It sucks to have to dump money in to a brand new truck (possibly new tires, getting driveshaft checked out, alignment from NON- gmc place). Its funny though, I rode in a RAM before this and it rode like a dream. If I can't get these issues resolved, I might be heading that way

The All-Terrain shares the same shocks as the Z71, I am pretty sure. I wouldn't dump any money into it, if the issues can be replicated and shown to a dealer take it to a GMC dealer, show them the issues and request a loaner vehicle until your truck is fixed. The truck should not have any shake nor should the steering wheel be off-center. Take it in and demand, as politely as possible, that they make it right. If you do end up pursuing a lemon law suit the paperwork and documentation of the issues at a GMC dealer will be very beneficial.

Posted
1 hour ago, Brianibew said:

They do ride like crap.  If you have the “Z71” package, it’s the most jarring, unforgiving, crap ride out there in the pickup world right now.  Everyone has an opinion about suspensions, and my opinion is GM needs to up their game on ride quality.  I agree with you, the 3/4 tons ride better than the 1/2 ton z71.

This is due to the " Rancho " shocks the Z71 package is equipped with.

Switch over to Bilstein or any other reliable house made brand and you might just love to drive your truck again.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, contenderv07 said:

I've got the All Terrain package on mine. I think what I may do first is get the driveshaft checked. The trans issue I can KIND of deal with but still.. It sucks to have to dump money in to a brand new truck (possibly new tires, getting driveshaft checked out, alignment from NON- gmc place). Its funny though, I rode in a RAM before this and it rode like a dream. If I can't get these issues resolved, I might be heading that way

The Ram has a fantastic ride to it and the interior on the new 2019 Rams is unreal.

Posted
1 hour ago, contenderv07 said:

I've got the All Terrain package on mine. I think what I may do first is get the driveshaft checked. The trans issue I can KIND of deal with but still.. It sucks to have to dump money in to a brand new truck (possibly new tires, getting driveshaft checked out, alignment from NON- gmc place). Its funny though, I rode in a RAM before this and it rode like a dream. If I can't get these issues resolved, I might be heading that way

My dealership just replaced two tires on mine to resolve an issue I was having.  It's a brand new truck.  Make them make it right.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I just started having AC issues with my 2012 Sierra. The symptom is blowing warm air on all vents.  Here is what I have checked so far. Compressor clutch appears to be engaging and cycling  I checked all fuses and relay, no issues. The only thing I have notices is the short line that comes from the firewall is very cold / frosted. This line is approximately 12 inches long. The coldness stops when it hits the first line connector. As far as AC compressor - At first start the clutch engages, runs continually, Short AC line frosts up. After idling for several minutes the AC line thaws out some but is still cool and the compressor clutch starts cycling on and off every 5 seconds.  Any suggestions on what to look at next would be appreciated.  
    • Unless you are using a bypass filer system with a Beta of 1000 at 2 micron the commercial filters we have access to, even the very best of them, are poor at the 5 to 10 micron range the typical UOA test can 'see'. Point is there are some truly awful filters being sold A 45 micron Beta 75 filter is what Dyson used to call a screen door on a submarine. That leaves wear metals disconnected from filtration unless particulates are larger than the test can 'see' and yet captured by the filter...which is its job. If that is true then you have a major issue screaming at you.    The graph isn't mine. It belongs to GM and their study on this area. I looked up those studies and provided those SAE tech paper addresses multiple times. Machinery Lubrication displayed it and confirmed it. So if you have doubts about the study you'll have to take it up with GM Engineering. Just like you would have to take up a difference in opinion about the meaning a word with Webster or the length of on inch with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.      Most manuals have two schedules. "Normal Service" and "Severe Service". On it's face it tells you that oil in severe service is more highly stressed and doesn't "Last as Long". The item to bore in on is LAST...what does that mean?    It's the same question one asks about how long to toast bread. What are the inputs? Bread type? Wattage of the toaster? Distance from the elements? What is your preferred level of done?    So lets paint this with a broader brush. Oil is made up of the base and the additive package. The first is altered by heat and oxygen and later is sacrificial with a finite life subject to inputs toward that end. Resistance and supply.    It is the reason an OEM's OCI's are determined by 1.) the specifications of the recommended lubricant and 2.) risk management toward the bottom line. Those lubricants are also subject to cost effectiveness for the OEM.    There is a tendency for most people to believe that the OEM recommended oil rest on the top shelf and that anything other is lesser than. Truth is there are more oils on higher shelves than those on the lower shelf below the OEM's. They make that choice on COST TO THE OEM. Testing is incidental to the margin.    GM makes MONEY, the car/truck is a TOOL to leverage MONEY. Insert whatever car brand you like. Until you forking over a million plus COST not quality is the driver. Thus it is by DESIGN the recommended OCI's and oils fall well short of 'best practice protections'. Proof isn't hard to find. GM Ecotec I-4 2400 breather system and cold start PCM tuning has killed more motors and resulted in more litigation for those that used the 'recommended' practice than GM could bear. What was their response? SHORTEN THE OCI. TWICE.    I don't know how long to leave oil in an I don't know how the oil will respond to MY circumstances and because I don't and can't blanket statement or anecdotal evidence my way out of it.....I TEST and FIND the right OCI for the oil I CHOOSE. There is no shortcut but there is blind allegiance. I don't blindly trust anything.    People hear the word 'detergent' and believe that in the context of oil it means the same thing as laundry soap... Only in the most rudimentary way. It's the first additive to give up on you and they are putting less and less with each new API standard. Solvency can be used but it cost. Some unique undisclosed chemistries can be used. Valvoline R & P in example. OEM's haven't an interest in anything they see as limiting market participation. Whatever.         
    • For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...