Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Thunderflight said:

I found two different part numbers for the S type 140773 and 140778 whats the difference in sound? I have a 2019 HC crew cab short bed with 6.2

140778 is the true dual exhaust (single muffler) for the 6.2L.  2 pipes in / 2pipes out.

 

I'd definitely go with that one.  Much better setup than a single in/dual out... Wish they made it for the 5.3L.

Edited by Swiftks
Posted
On 11/26/2019 at 7:18 PM, Swiftks said:

140778 is the true dual exhaust (single muffler) for the 6.2L.  2 pipes in / 2pipes out.

 

I'd definitely go with that one.  Much better setup than a single in/dual out... Wish they made it for the 5.3L.

Is there any actual performance difference though?

Posted
28 minutes ago, Mstorm18 said:

Is there any actual performance difference though?

Is there any real performance difference with the regular Borla single in/dual out over stock exhaust; i.e. GM's "performance exhaust"?

 

If there are gains to be had with a bolt on exhaust (no long tube headers), besides a nice growl and your butt dyno, then it's even more true for a true dual exhaust.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Swiftks said:

Is there any real performance difference with the regular Borla single in/dual out over stock exhaust; i.e. GM's "performance exhaust"?

 

If there are gains to be had with a bolt on exhaust (no long tube headers), besides a nice growl and your butt dyno, then it's even more true for a true dual exhaust.

There is and it's been posted in a multitude of places. Is it huge? no, but it's noticeable.

 

I shouldn't been more clear and the reason for my ask. The dual in / dual out has no tips and uses the factory valances...boring. It doesn't appear Borla makes a quad tip setup like the single in / dual out packages to add on to this dual in / dual out package. So I'm weighing the difference between HP/TQ adds between the two packages vs the appearances.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mstorm18 said:

There is and it's been posted in a multitude of places. Is it huge? no, but it's noticeable.

 

I shouldn't been more clear and the reason for my ask. The dual in / dual out has no tips and uses the factory valances...boring. It doesn't appear Borla makes a quad tip setup like the single in / dual out packages to add on to this dual in / dual out package. So I'm weighing the difference between HP/TQ adds between the two packages vs the appearances.

Aaahhh that makes more sense... Well that's stupid they don't offer their dual exhaust with different tips, since it's their best one.  I do love the carbon fiber tips, that's the one I got.

 

I'd call them tomorrow and ask to speak to someone in their technical department, and see if adding the tips you like would be possible to the dual exhaust.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I installed the gm performance exhaust and the factory air induction in my 2019 Denali with the6.2. It was a little louder than what I wanted on a denali so I had a cherry bomb put on each pipe just before the tips. It toned it down but sounds better than the stock exhaust.At 70mph Ivan get almost 26 mph. Get up above 75 and it drops back to around 19-20. also installed a Peddle Commander and absolutely love it. It makes throttle response unbelievable. I want to get the truck dynoed but my guys say they haven’t come out with a way to hack the computer. They have guys lined up waiting on super chargers but have no way to tune them

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Rduatctt said:

I installed the gm performance exhaust and the factory air induction in my 2019 Denali with the6.2. It was a little louder than what I wanted on a denali so I had a cherry bomb put on each pipe just before the tips. It toned it down but sounds better than the stock exhaust.At 70mph Ivan get almost 26 mph. Get up above 75 and it drops back to around 19-20. also installed a Peddle Commander and absolutely love it. It makes throttle response unbelievable. I want to get the truck dynoed but my guys say they haven’t come out with a way to hack the computer. They have guys lined up waiting on super chargers but have no way to tune them

Not trying to sound like a ass, but your "guy" needs to keep up to date for his customers.

 

 

HP Tuners released their tune a couple weeks ago.  First ones to crack the ECM.  Only thing is, you have to do a ECM swap, and then buy the credits and software, and have a custom tune done... Say around $3K.

 

Also, warranty is definitely going buh bye with this...

Edited by Swiftks
Posted

i've talked to Borla and posted about the duals before. I'm not sure what "mods" would be suggested where true duals gain more than the 1-2. I assume more than just a CAI. 

 

There is not much in the way of performance gains on a stock vehicle over our regular system, the true dual is geared towards increased potential for vehicles that have further modifications than stock. The sound quality on a single vs true dual is not different. An S-type sounds like an S-type etc.

Posted

Don’t want to do a swap. Haven’t talked to them in a few weeks. They are a high performance racing shop and trust what they tell me. This will be the 3rd truck that they will tune for me. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Rduatctt said:

Don’t want to do a swap. Haven’t talked to them in a few weeks. They are a high performance racing shop and trust what they tell me. This will be the 3rd truck that they will tune for me. 

Sounds good.  What part of the country are you in?  I'm in Houston and supposedly Houston House of Power did the first full custom tune on one this past week.

 

Anyway, unfortunately a ECM swap is typically the only way a tune can be performed on these vehicles now days.  I wouldn't do it myself, definitely take it into a shop to have them do it, and then tune it.

 

More info. can be found in this thread about tuning as well:

 

Posted

North Carolina. RPM Motorsports handles my mods. Been happy with them so far. Truck performs really well, would like to get the top end limiter removed, the rest I can deal with for now

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Has anyone messed with the flappers at all? I’m just doing a muffler swap this week but I’m absolutely lost when it comes to the flappers. I want as much noise as I can get without droning at highway speed or too much noise at cruise. I got a Magnaflow 11229 muffler. Question is, do I cut both flappers off or only one? If one, which one? I’m thinking the upstream flapper will kill more drone than the downstream. I read on another post that both flappers removes makes too much drone

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/1/2019 at 7:56 PM, Mstorm18 said:

There is and it's been posted in a multitude of places. Is it huge? no, but it's noticeable.

 

I shouldn't been more clear and the reason for my ask. The dual in / dual out has no tips and uses the factory valances...boring. It doesn't appear Borla makes a quad tip setup like the single in / dual out packages to add on to this dual in / dual out package. So I'm weighing the difference between HP/TQ adds between the two packages vs the appearances.

 

Check out the following part numbers.  Borla offers all their tip options with the dual system.  

 

PNs 140778, 140779BC, 140779CF, 140785

 

 

I’m looking at the true dual systems too but can’t find any sound clips so or comments regarding sound with DFM so am a bit hestitant.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...