Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

BORLA Exhaust for the 2019+ Silverado 1500 (In Development)

 

Each BORLA exhaust system is made with T-304 stainless steel to give you the best in durability and performance. We strive to provide you with high quality products and stand behind our systems with a Million-Mile Warranty. We are excited to offer a number of exhaust options for the 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500, allowing you to customize the way your Silverado or Sierra looks, sounds, and performs. 

 

BORLA R&D has been working on the 2019 Silverado/Sierra and we would love to hear from all of you!

We will be offering exhaust systems that will work with the valance tips, however, we are also considering offering systems with quad tips to replace the factory valance tips. The quad tip system you will see in the photos feature our carbon fiber tips. 

 

Would a quad tip system be something of interest? Or do you all prefer the factory valance tips?

 

Please feel free to ask us questions and give us your feedback! 

 

 

 

_NEO8715-1.jpg

2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 - Borla - 10-23-2018_2347.jpg

2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 - Borla - 10-23-2018_2351.jpg

2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 - Borla - 10-23-2018_2354.jpg

2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 - Borla - 10-23-2018_2331.jpg

2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 - Borla - 10-23-2018_2337.jpg

Edited by ian@borla
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

That looks pretty sporty, but at the same time I almost think it looks a little too busy.

 

My personal opinion after a few minutes of lookin at it, I would potentially consider it but only because I'm into the whole 33/35 inch tires with a level or small lift look.  I think it kind of adds to the aggressive look. I do not think this would look right at all on your standard stock truck.

 

Awesome idea though, I think you should roll with it!!

 

 

I am anxious to hear how the quad tips sound vs a traditional single side exit.

Posted

Agree, like the quad tips, but think the standard valance tips would look better on an otherwise stock looking truck.

Posted

For my High Country I would prefer factory valance tips.  I am also interested in the sound.  My neighbor has the BORLA on his 2018 and it sounds great on the Outside but I am not a fan of it while riding inside!

Posted

I think it looks good! However 4 tips makes me think of sports car/muscle car. I think removing the valance and adding 2 rectangular type tips carbon fiber or polished  etc. would look more at home on a truck. 

Posted

 Who is making the GM cat-back systems they are putting in the 19s? Is it Borla or Corsa? I have it as a dealer installed option. Sounds great by the way. Too old and stupid to give you a soundtrack. Anyone know?

Posted (edited)

Ian@Borla: As a mid 30’s 2019 LTZ owner, the quad tips are a little too sporty for me. Don’t get me wrong though, Borla still may have an interest from the guys who purchase an RST. The quad tips to me yell “Sporty” & “Fast”

 

Moving forward to the stock valance tips, in my opinion it would be cool to offer a black chrome tip possibly? Carbon fiber valance tips could look pretty sweet as well, but with the borla logo stamped on the underside, not on the top like the quad tips in the photo above are. So essentially the exact same specs as the stock tips, just a different color such as the black chrome OR carbon fiber.

 

To cover sound, I do think the new trucks are lacking the mean sound the older stock silverados had with the new setup. I personally would not want a loud glass pack sounding truck, but increase the mean rumble by a tad possibly. Some folks want their exhaust to be heard from a mile away and set off car alarms, but that is just not me.

 

If the exhaust you come out with could not be noticed when your in the cab of the truck, increased the meanness/rumble just a tad on a cold start, and gave it a small upgraded growl, but not too much, on an engine rev I’d be a buyer.

 

before I bought though I would have to see a YouTube video of stock vs. the borla system to listen to the sound.

 

 

Edited by Big E in TX
Spelling error
Posted

I gotta say....I love those quad tips!!!   I just bought my T1 LTZ with 6.2 and I will be buying one if you make it.  BTW, I am at the VEC in warren everyday in case you need a test vehicle to put one on. :)

Posted

After I get my Trail boss suspension kit installed, and a borla exhaust,  I will have the perfect truck that I couldn't buy.   2019 T1 LTZ with 6.2, 10speed trans,  9.76 axle with 3.42 gears,  than to max tow package,  and now the Trail boss 2 lift kit with some tires.  :)   Going to be a one of a kind. 

Posted

how about a tip that replaces that factory one but looks the same like the challengers have for the scatpacks etc. it replaces the valence tip and is then attached to the exhaust. looks good. I like the quad tip as well. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I'm a fan of stock valance.  Any ETA on these?  I've been waiting for a touring system. 

 

 

 

 

Edit 

 

I'll clarify, I am not a fan of bump exit exhaust anyway and have always preferred side exit behind the tire.  Your system looks great, it's just not something I'd personally choose.  As mentioned I wouldn't mind different valances (black chrome, Carbon Fiber, Black) 

Edited by MadCaddie
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Hi ian@borla 

 

I'm driving: 2019 GMC SIERRA DENALI 6.2

 

I love the quad tips. I almost bought the GM factory exhaust upgrade after failed Borla attempt... but ultimately I decided to hold off for you guys.

 

I bought a Borla exhaust when I first got the truck through bad advice from a Borla exhaust dealer who claimed they called and spoke with you guys about it. They took care of the return but I had shop time costs and the hassle of getting it sent back.

 

I would love to be one of your first customers for this. Will this be available in all 3 flavors? 

 

Any soundbytes available right now?

 

Posted

I literally joined this forum to find an exhaust. I am excited to hear Borla is developing. I want to keep my factory chrome outlets, though. It’s such a sophisticated look on the high country.  Keep us up to date, please. 

Posted

Look forward to hearing some sound clips when available.  I will most likely be interested in the Touring sound level retaining the factory valance look.  I don't dislike the quad tips, but not sure I like them better on a 4wd LTZ like mine.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...