Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've noticed that you don't even try to pack in that little bit of extra fuel.

Posted

No issues with mine.  I do however want a cap, I don't like the cap-less at all, I worry about dirt \ water getting in there.  I was spraying the truck off the other day and the water lifted the gas door open, that's all I need is a direct shot of water in there.   It's too easy for someone to mess with it also. 

 

Thoughts?

Posted
1 hour ago, Smitty said:

No issues with mine.  I do however want a cap, I don't like the cap-less at all, I worry about dirt \ water getting in there.  I was spraying the truck off the other day and the water lifted the gas door open, that's all I need is a direct shot of water in there.   It's too easy for someone to mess with it also. 

 

Thoughts?

I bought a cover on eBay for 7 or 8 bucks. Think it’s just a glorified bearing buddy cover but whatever. They also sell locking ones at the auto parts store.

 

Supposedly there’s a drain in the spout that stops the water, but at least in the winter I like my little cover for some peace of mind.

 

A17270B0-B794-4B84-B0AC-28FBA12F2669.thumb.jpeg.08d46b3bdb1c65a33763c57a8c7802cf.jpeg

Posted
16 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

I bought a cover on eBay for 7 or 8 bucks. Think it’s just a glorified bearing buddy cover but whatever. They also sell locking ones at the auto parts store.

 

Supposedly there’s a drain in the spout that stops the water, but at least in the winter I like my little cover for some peace of mind.

 

A17270B0-B794-4B84-B0AC-28FBA12F2669.thumb.jpeg.08d46b3bdb1c65a33763c57a8c7802cf.jpeg

That's perfect, thank you!  It does look like a bearing buddy cover exactly... but hey, if it works! 

Posted
20 hours ago, Smitty said:

No issues with mine.  I do however want a cap, I don't like the cap-less at all, I worry about dirt \ water getting in there.  I was spraying the truck off the other day and the water lifted the gas door open, that's all I need is a direct shot of water in there.   It's too easy for someone to mess with it also. 

 

Thoughts?

I remember seeing another thread on this with a bunch of different low cost options. 

Posted

I actually found some good information on how the whole capless system works which makes me feel better.   I don't have the link still but it was right from GM.   Most systems have a spring loaded door with a rubber seal on it where the gas nozzle has to go through, so there is some force involved etc.  GM has 2 of these doors \ flaps not just one making sure dirt \ water doesn't get in there.   There is a gap between the outside and the actual flaps as well to allow dirt \ water to fall through  before it gets to those flaps and into the tank as well.  The system has been around for quite a while, I wasn't aware of any of this.   It's also nice because you don't have to worry about losing that cap or getting the dreaded engine code that shows when the cap isn't on!   I still kind of want something to cover it because i'm funny like that but it sounds like they really thought this through and you don't NEED one.  I would appreciate something that held the gas door closed instead of just a spring though, I want to keep the inside clean regardless. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Smitty said:

I actually found some good information on how the whole capless system works which makes me feel better.   I don't have the link still but it was right from GM.   Most systems have a spring loaded door with a rubber seal on it where the gas nozzle has to go through, so there is some force involved etc.  GM has 2 of these doors \ flaps not just one making sure dirt \ water doesn't get in there.   There is a gap between the outside and the actual flaps as well to allow dirt \ water to fall through  before it gets to those flaps and into the tank as well.  The system has been around for quite a while, I wasn't aware of any of this.   It's also nice because you don't have to worry about losing that cap or getting the dreaded engine code that shows when the cap isn't on!   I still kind of want something to cover it because i'm funny like that but it sounds like they really thought this through and you don't NEED one.  I would appreciate something that held the gas door closed instead of just a spring though, I want to keep the inside clean regardless. 

I can't believe that a truck that can cost north of $80k CAD doesn't come with a locking gas cap.

Posted

I've had the same type of system since I purchased my 2014 Corvette, I was never really a fan of it but it's been flawless for almost 5 years now. The Corvette isn't out in the weather or slop that the truck is out in but I'd have to assume that they are pretty sure of themselves now that they are using it on the trucks.

Posted

The main reason I bought the cap is because after a winter car wash, I had some ice sitting on the first flapper. Undoubtably if me (or my old lady) just jammed a fuel nozzle into it, that ice would be pushed past both flappers and right into the tank.

 

A small amount of water may not hurt but really it’s no trouble for me to pull a rubber cap off. It’s not like I didn’t have to unscrew a gas cap on every other vehicle I’ve owned anyway.

  • Like 1
Posted

I spend a lot of time down North Carolina's OBX. The wind blows the sand into every imaginable place when it's really ripping. I've seen a little pile of sand right on top of the trap door. I use the plastic 'bearing buddy 'cover shown by others when I'm down there.

  • 8 months later...
Posted
On 11/9/2018 at 10:29 PM, Btown said:

Have a 2019 Silverado. Filled truck up 4 times now at 4 different stations in 2 different states. As gas tank fuel filler neck gets full gas nozzle shuts off and gas shoots out of filler neck all down the side of my new truck. If I did not jump out of the way it would be on me too. This is a brand new truck and has done this from day one. Plus gas all over the paint can’t be good for the clear coat.  It’s not the gas pump since it does it everywhere  and I have tried jamming the nozzle in as far as I can get it and tried pumping the gas very slow. Always same result, pump cuts off and then gas projectiles out of the filler neck.  Anyone else have this issue?  Thanks 

This just happened to me. New 2019 w/ 3k miles on her.  First time it’s happened, and I’ve had a 15 and an 18.  My 15/18 had the annoying fuel neck issue where the auto pump would cut off constantly, but not this.  Going to call dealer tomorrow about the fuel filter hose.  Has the fix held up?  

Posted

Stitch :  I took mine to my dealer and they could not find anything wrong with the filler neck.  Next time I fueled up problem was magically gone so I don’t know what fixed it or if  just checking unclogged something ? 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 3/5/2019 at 4:43 PM, OnTheReel said:

I bought a cover on eBay for 7 or 8 bucks. Think it’s just a glorified bearing buddy cover but whatever. They also sell locking ones at the auto parts store.

 

Supposedly there’s a drain in the spout that stops the water, but at least in the winter I like my little cover for some peace of mind.

 

A17270B0-B794-4B84-B0AC-28FBA12F2669.thumb.jpeg.08d46b3bdb1c65a33763c57a8c7802cf.jpeg

That's odd...my filler port is on the right side and the rubber plug for the DEF is on the left.  And mine is also a 6.2L.

Edited by AlaskaErik
Posted
On 11/17/2019 at 10:02 PM, Btown said:

Stitch :  I took mine to my dealer and they could not find anything wrong with the filler neck.  Next time I fueled up problem was magically gone so I don’t know what fixed it or if  just checking unclogged something ? 

Hopefully it's fixed, but I've got about 6 tanks in mine and this is the first time it happened.  Thinking back on it, the truck was autostopped and I don't think I ever turned off the ignition because I'm not used to the auto stop and didn't hear the engine.

 

Only X factor I can think of vs. the other tanks that filled fine, was yours completely off when you filled up? 

  • 6 months later...
Posted

Brand new 2020 AT4 6.2L and I have tried filling up 3 times and it has happened all 3 times.  Only filled to 3/4.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...