Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

People  !!! Front gear ratio change is not available for 2021 Silverado 1500 4X4.  So do not change rear ratio because you cannot change the front !!!. I learned the hard way after having my rear end done to 4:56 . We have contacted many axle rear end shops and they say " NOT AVAILABLE"  NOBODY KNOWS WHEN GEAR SET WILL BE AVAILABLE.. . My rear end is already geared to 4:56 so I am stuck driving truck with out front drive line while waiting for someone to manufacture front 4:56 gear ratio... My tires are 36"

Posted
Just now, Alfred Padula said:

People  !!! Front gear ratio change is not available for 2021 Silverado 1500 4X4.  So do not change rear ratio because you cannot change the front !!!. I learned the hard way after having my rear end done to 4:56 . We have contacted many axle rear end shops and they say " NOT AVAILABLE"  NOBODY KNOWS WHEN GEAR SET WILL BE AVAILABLE.. . My rear end is already geared to 4:56 so I am stuck driving truck with out front drive line while waiting for someone to manufacture front 4:56 gear ratio... My tires are 36"

Any help would be greatly appreciated !!!

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I'm on the same boat, I've been looking at re-gearing since I'm running 37", no luck finding front gears or lockers, any one has any solutions for this new stile Silverado, I have a trail boss edition

Posted

Rayo, there is no front gearing available as of yet. Rear gears are available but when my 4x4 shop  installed them and a Hypertech  speedo calibrator for the 4:56 rear gears my truck computer would not accept this change. there is no fix as of yet....I drive my truck in Tow/Haul mode all the time which really helps out but this is not a permanent fix.

Posted (edited)

I believe with the front its not a simple ring/pinion swap you have to replace the whole diff. I don't know if the front diff is different on T1's or not, but with the k2's you can go up to 3.73.

 

For some reason I'm thinking the 3.0 diesel has 3.73s, so you should be able to. 

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
1 hour ago, M1ck3y said:

I believe with the front its not a simple ring/pinion swap you have to replace the whole diff. I don't know if the front diff is different on T1's or not, but with the k2's you can go up to 3.73.

 

For some reason I'm thinking the 3.0 diesel has 3.73s, so you should be able to. 

Take a look at your front diff.  About ten years ago GM went from the split diff style front IFS diffs they had been using to a more conventional (looks like a rear diff with a removable cover) diff.  I believe the ring gear changed then as well.

 

Starting in 2019, after the AAM Co rear axle vibration issue the 14-18 trucks suffered from, GM has started making their own axles again as well as using some AAM Co axles.  That's where the change is.

 

These axles can be regeared just like any other axle.  The aftermarket just hasn't started making gears for the front yet.  The rear axles are pretty much the same internally since 2014.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, AJMBLAZER said:

Take a look at your front diff.  About ten years ago GM went from the split diff style front IFS diffs they had been using to a more conventional (looks like a rear diff with a removable cover) diff.  I believe the ring gear changed then as well.

 

Starting in 2019, after the AAM Co rear axle vibration issue the 14-18 trucks suffered from, GM has started making their own axles again as well as using some AAM Co axles.  That's where the change is.

 

These axles can be regeared just like any other axle.  The aftermarket just hasn't started making gears for the front yet.  The rear axles are pretty much the same internally since 2014.

 

Good info, thanks. So your saying the T1's use the same front diff as the k2's?

Posted

I can't confirm that.  I do think that they must have changed something internally on the AAM Co made front axles since it seems like the ring and pinion from the 14-18 trucks won't work.

 

The new GM front axles are not supported by the aftermarket yet.

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

I know this is an old post but since GM offers the 3.0 Duramax with 3.73's and someone like me who has a 6.2 with 3.42's and has gone up to 35's, going to 3.73's would make up for the tire size difference. (weight and wind resistance is a different story) but at least when towing my 10,000lb toy hauler I'd be slightly better off than where I am today. I'd rather go all the way to a 4.10 but with 3.73's my speedo would be extremely close and I could ditch the Hypertech inline corrector. Thoughts?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, jpfanner said:

I know this is an old post but since GM offers the 3.0 Duramax with 3.73's and someone like me who has a 6.2 with 3.42's and has gone up to 35's, going to 3.73's would make up for the tire size difference. (weight and wind resistance is a different story) but at least when towing my 10,000lb toy hauler I'd be slightly better off than where I am today. I'd rather go all the way to a 4.10 but with 3.73's my speedo would be extremely close and I could ditch the Hypertech inline corrector. Thoughts?

 

I'm in basically the same boat.  See this post in a different thread: 

 I'm actually in slightly worse shape, since my AT4 has factory 3.23 gearing.  I'm at (effectively) a 3.08 gear right now with 35" tires and the stock 3.23's.  The 6.2L and 10-speed trans DO make up for a lot, but 3.73's would get me pretty close to (effectively) stock 3.42 gearing, which is the same thing you're after (and should be perfect for my needs).

While I'm pretty sure rear axle ring/pinion sets are available aftermarket (my rear axle is an SU7; an AAM axle.  SU8 is the GM rear axle)... the big questions revolve around the front axle.  

Rumor has it that GM may be welding (or otherwise permanently attaching) the ring gear to the carrier in the front axles on these trucks.  If that's true (and I've heard it from more than one source) then that may be part of the reason the aftermarket doesn't seem to have any ring/pinion sets available (yet, anyway).

Now I'm not opposed to purchasing a whole front carrier (w/ring) and pinion directly from GM in 3.73 if that's the only way to do it right now, but that brings additional questions into play.  GM is using two different front axles on these trucks.  The SU5 (what I have) is a GM front axle.   And there's also an SU4, an AAM front axle.

 

So, if the 3.73 front ratio is only available with the 3.0L Duramax diesel, which front axle are they putting in those trucks?... and/or... are the internals (ring/pinion/carrier) interchangeable between the AAM and GM axle?  Because if ALL of the Duramax diesel 3.73 geared 4x4 trucks have AAM axles... and the internals are not interchangeable... then even trying to buy 3.73 front gearing direct from GM won't work for me (and my GM front axle).       

 

Just food for thought.  If you come up with a workable solution, please do come back and post it here (I'll do the same).

Edited by barr8888
Posted

The front gears are not “welded to” the front carrier. That’s been disproven many times. There’s pictures around here to prove it. 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, AJMBLAZER said:

The front gears are not “welded to” the front carrier. That’s been disproven many times. There’s pictures around here to prove it. 

 

It's not my intent to spread misinformation... I'm only citing what I've personally been told by a GM dealership parts person... and have also read elsewhere. 

I acknowledge that it doesn't sound like something that makes any sense to me.  I don't see how the hardness of the ring gear itself could be maintained if any attempt was made to weld it, for one.

 I haven't taken the cover off my front axle to verify anything personally yet.  But finding reliable information and/or parts to change the front axle ratio has been much more of a challenge than I was expecting, so far.

Edited by barr8888
Posted

What happens if you re-gear the rear but not the front?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Byrds8 said:

What happens if you re-gear the rear but not the front?

You can’t use 4x4. The tires would be turning at different speeds front and back and as soon as they grabbed traction something would break. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,015 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...