Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, silverado2k18 said:

my 2018 has the gap towards the back, with wifi.  my buddy's 2018 has the gap towards the front, with wifi.   same year.......

Of course! Sorry, MOST of the newer trucks have it in the front. It's not a water seal but for some reason GM started putting the gap towards the front. I plan on putting a sealant around the base of mine, hopefully it will stop water from getting to the seal inside that is SUPPOSED to keep the water out.

Posted

I guess GM designed the seal and said, we know this is gonna fail so lets design it so when water gets it, it can get out too? WTF? Id like to know the real reason why its designed like it is..

Posted

The Rubber with the gap, is not a seal.  It is simply a way to attach the antenna to the roof, and have a good contour and not have any paint wear or direct contact from the plastic of the antenna to the roof. 

 

As pointed out, you should not silicon the OUTER section of the antenna, as the gap is designed to let water/air out.  The correct way is to remove the antenna, and use a silicon/RTV/whatever you want in addition to the foam seal.

 

here are some pics from my thread

 

I never had a leak in 90K miles as you can obviously see here.  You can see the outer rubber of the antenna, and then the inner seal area.

09D2B601-D49A-4829-AFCB-391968D5E488.jpeg

 

 

This is the Foam seal that actually does all the work to keep the water out

22A6FA13-2622-4C09-AD2B-F0AD56A16F27.jpeg

 

The only reason I swapped was to go from the 14 Non painted Antenna on my Denali to the 15+ Painted antenna

Posted

Has anyone tried using stip caulk/dum dum/whatever everyone calls it? I think that's what I'm gonna try on mine when I take it off to "improve".

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Thank you y'all of your help.

 

My technician friend came last week and resealed the thing. We had to remove the headliner to have an access to the antenna. 

 

I used "GE All Purpose Silicone - Clear" to reseal the stupid fin.

 

I hope the leak will stop permanently. However, I did lose my signal for the XM radio. It says "Receiption may be blocked".

 

My just re-activated the membership and tried to refresh the signal multiple times, but still no signal.

 

I'm not sure what is really the cause of the connection issue. We made sure every wire were properly re-connected. I suspect the antenna has been defective after the leaking occurred. 

 

Shame on you GM! trying to save some money to build and install cheap parts leading to major issues. :fume:

IMG_20190223_204100.jpg

Posted
23 hours ago, RACERX7775 said:

Did it say it was blocked before you removed the antenna?

No, XM radio was working before I removed it.

Posted

Well, either you blobbed to much on or you damaged the connector.  Its gotta come apart again to see what happened. You didnt take the antenna apart did you? Its just the one bolt right? This is on my 14, i think the newer ones are a tad different because of the wifi..

20180911_163627.jpg

Posted
On 2/26/2019 at 9:36 AM, RACERX7775 said:

Well, either you blobbed to much on or you damaged the connector.  Its gotta come apart again to see what happened. You didnt take the antenna apart did you? Its just the one bolt right? This is on my 14, i think the newer ones are a tad different because of the wifi..

20180911_163627.jpg

That's what I think too. I might blobbed too much but I don't think I damaged the connector.  

II just loosened the bolt that holds the antenna, I did not fully remove it.

 

I will just by another antenna and I hope that will fix the problem.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 3/1/2019 at 11:57 AM, RACERX7775 said:

Why buy a new one. Take it off, peel the stuff off, reapply just enough to seal it.

We worked on it last weekend. We checked the wiring and try to remove the excessive rtv.

 

However, after several attempts, it still says "signal may be blocked" . I refreshed the signal multiple times through the XM website, but the antenna did not pick up any signal.

 

I ended up putting a new antenna. As soon as I connected it, "signal may be blocked" was disappeared . I finally got my XM radio working back after refreshing the signal with the new fin.

 

It costs me overall over $100 to fix the stupid leak and to restore the signal:

$10 for the clear RTV and the Caulking Gun

$50 for the new antenna (part # 23258394)

$50 for the labor cost that I paid for my technician friend

 

If I were going to the dealer to handle it, they would charge me nearly $300 to reseal it.

Edited by hamooz
  • 2 months later...
Posted

So it started raining inside the truck on Sunday.  2015 Silverado.  I removed the shark fin antenna.  Cleaned up the sealing surfaces and applied pure silicone sealant.  We'll see how long this works.  A hole in the roof is not a very bright idea.  

  • 5 years later...
Posted

I have the same issue with my 2018 Equinox. Spare tire tub fills up with water when it rains hard. I've been wondering if my sunroof had been leaking cuz I had water in the back seat floor area as well. Could be more extensive than originally anticipated.

Not sure the reason or cause but I've noticed this came all of a sudden after I've been running my car through the automatic car wash. It's the one with the rotating flapping pads or strips. And those flaps beat on the sunroof and shark fin antenna. I may think twice about that particular type of brushless car wash once I finally get my leaking roof fixed.

Posted
4 hours ago, HotRodDan said:

I have the same issue with my 2018 Equinox. Spare tire tub fills up with water when it rains hard. I've been wondering if my sunroof had been leaking cuz I had water in the back seat floor area as well. Could be more extensive than originally anticipated.

Not sure the reason or cause but I've noticed this came all of a sudden after I've been running my car through the automatic car wash. It's the one with the rotating flapping pads or strips. And those flaps beat on the sunroof and shark fin antenna. I may think twice about that particular type of brushless car wash once I finally get my leaking roof fixed.

Put some clear RTV around the antenna and that should stop the leak.  Continued use of those car washes will tear the RTV off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...