Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have a 2017 6.2L Crew Cab 8-speed with a Magnuson TVS1900, Blackbear tune, and Methanol Injection if you want to contact me and ask any questions.

 

Yes, you need to run 91 octane or better. At worst, my MPG is 11.5 (and that's with ZERO freeway driving in stop and go Los Angeles traffic...and getting into boost quite a bit for fun). The 1900 alone at 6psi is plenty to put a huge smile on your face - although your truck won't feel quite as peppy as mine because of the lift and tires (I'm stock everything with 20"). Lastly, the stock Magnuson tune is a great tune to start with. If you do feel you want more, you can get someone else to tune it, but there's no real need.

 

I've had a Magnuson on my trucks for 15 years now. The only problem I had was a blown transmission after 10 years. The $2500 to replace it was worth the "pay to play" fun I had with it for a decade.

 

Price-wise, I paid $38500 for the SLT, Bose, heated/vented seats and 2wd. That's all the options I wanted, so I drove the price down. I didn't need 4wd anymore, so I cut it out for the first time in my life. Blower was about $5100 + $800 install.

Edited by Mileguru
  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 2/15/2019 at 9:56 PM, Mileguru said:

I have a 2017 6.2L Crew Cab 8-speed with a Magnuson TVS1900, Blackbear tune, and Methanol Injection if you want to contact me and ask any questions.

 

Yes, you need to run 91 octane or better. At worst, my MPG is 11.5 (and that's with ZERO freeway driving in stop and go Los Angeles traffic...and getting into boost quite a bit for fun). The 1900 alone at 6psi is plenty to put a huge smile on your face - although your truck won't feel quite as peppy as mine because of the lift and tires (I'm stock everything with 20"). Lastly, the stock Magnuson tune is a great tune to start with. If you do feel you want more, you can get someone else to tune it, but there's no real need.

 

I've had a Magnuson on my trucks for 15 years now. The only problem I had was a blown transmission after 10 years. The $2500 to replace it was worth the "pay to play" fun I had with it for a decade.

 

Price-wise, I paid $38500 for the SLT, Bose, heated/vented seats and 2wd. That's all the options I wanted, so I drove the price down. I didn't need 4wd anymore, so I cut it out for the first time in my life. Blower was about $5100 + $800 install.

Do you know what your average mpg is on the freeway? I'm interested in supercharging my 2014 6.2. Thanks

Posted

Is this truck considered the Calloway edition? I've seen a few on the road around here. The local dealer has an Escalade with Calloway badges on it. I believe the Calloway is just the 6.2 with dealer installed S/C. One day I'll own a super or turbocharged 6.2l truck. I'm a mechanic and my best friend installs Magnuson's and prochargers for a local speed shop that his father in law owns. I'm also in the process of finishing my pole barn. Just waiting for electricity so I can get my hoist and compressor setup.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 3/12/2020 at 12:27 PM, NWdirt said:

Do you know what your average mpg is on the freeway? I'm interested in supercharging my 2014 6.2. Thanks

Sorry, I haven't driven enough freeway only miles in a very long time and don't exactly remember the mileage. If I had to go with my gut and best memory, I would guess somewhere near 20 though.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/14/2019 at 3:39 PM, flyingfool said:

I wouldn't touch it unless you like wasting precious weekends, sitting in the at the service departments waiting room, who cares if it's warranteed , i have better shit to do with my weekends.... there's a reason "it's for sale..." 

this truck really isn't all that fast compared to a tuned stock 6.2 truck. I believe it's 1 second quicker , nothing to write home about! its still a heavy pig, stock or boosted , MPG will be worse than factory , like 10mpg... buy an old F-body or used CTS-V if you want supercharged adrenaline

this is the biggest crock of shyt i ever seen on here, really ??? I have a 15 5.3 LTZ Z71 w all the mods, plus a procharger, its around 650-670 at the flywheel. I have not had to touch it since everything was installed, it hauls F'n azz and is a blast to drive. The AFM has been tuned out, anybody still running AFM better get that shyt tuned out or buy the plug in from Amazon, it will do more harm than good, if your that concerned about gas get a v6 and quit cryin about it. I'd buy a 1/2T with a 454 if they would sell me one...Roost

Posted
On 2/15/2019 at 11:44 AM, Jacoby said:

This was funny. A second faster is no big deal lol. A 1 second lower et on a drag strip is HUGE. The amount of power it takes to go 1 second faster is big. 

but its BS we both know that, dude dont have a clue its pretty obvious

Posted (edited)

I understand 1 sec is a lot of power, but when they compared the two trucks, NA vs S/C ,  I wasnt all that impressed with the power  output of the S/C kit on the market , I'm willing to bet you can get pretty close to those low boost Supercharger power numbers with just a well designed NA 6.2 set up, for far less than the $8k they will be charging you S/C guys to complete the project.

the stock truck is very de-tuned motor wise and transmission too.. a set of ported heads, and stage 2 BTR cam, e85 sensor, intake CAI, londtubes, exhaust, and light weight 17" wheels will even things out a lot on the comparision this would be close to a $3000 parts cost

 

I would recommend pulling trans and doing these upgrades first; bigger line boost valve, Circ D converter, trans cooler, all the new valve bodie updates and reducing the TorqueManagment intrusion by 20% , larger piston upgrade,, parts cost here is another $1500

 

 

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
On 3/12/2020 at 12:27 PM, NWdirt said:

Do you know what your average mpg is on the freeway? I'm interested in supercharging my 2014 6.2. Thanks

With everyone staying home, I had the most empty Friday afternoon freeway drive of my life in Los Angeles. Went down to Torrence to get 5 gallons of methanol just in case I can't get it for a while. Turns out my guess of 20mpg was right on the nose (and this is compensating for the DIC, which always says your MPGs are better than reality).

  • Like 1
  • 4 years later...
Posted

I got a 2019 Sierra 6.2 Magnason Charger and get 15 MPG on average and it walks the Dawg on most everything, and will do it while pulling a fat chic out a candy shop. But what do I know about it. Everyone can go back to their hateful keyboards now. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
On 2/14/2019 at 1:39 PM, flyingfool said:

I wouldn't touch it unless you like wasting precious weekends, sitting in the at the service departments waiting room, who cares if it's warranteed , i have better ****** to do with my weekends.... there's a reason "it's for sale..." 

this truck really isn't all that fast compared to a tuned stock 6.2 truck. I believe it's 1 second quicker , nothing to write home about! its still a heavy pig, stock or boosted , MPG will be worse than factory , like 10mpg... buy an old F-body or used CTS-V if you want supercharged adrenaline

It takes like 1 hp to run the blower when your foot is not in it, this guy likely doesn't even own a vehicle with a blower.

I only get like 12 mpg anyway so what is 2 less and that is likely not even accurate.

There is a REASON whipple has a 3 year warranty on them.

I know this is an old thread but I would have bought that truck in a second.

Edited by johnnyquick
Posted
On 3/14/2020 at 4:19 PM, flyingfool said:

I understand 1 sec is a lot of power, but when they compared the two trucks, NA vs S/C ,  I wasnt all that impressed with the power  output of the S/C kit on the market , I'm willing to bet you can get pretty close to those low boost Supercharger power numbers with just a well designed NA 6.2 set up, for far less than the $8k they will be charging you S/C guys to complete the project.

the stock truck is very de-tuned motor wise and transmission too.. a set of ported heads, and stage 2 BTR cam, e85 sensor, intake CAI, londtubes, exhaust, and light weight 17" wheels will even things out a lot on the comparision this would be close to a $3000 parts cost

 

I would recommend pulling trans and doing these upgrades first; bigger line boost valve, Circ D converter, trans cooler, all the new valve bodie updates and reducing the TorqueManagment intrusion by 20% , larger piston upgrade,, parts cost here is another $1500

 

 

For a Frankenstein motor with ZERO warranty

Posted (edited)

Any idea if the "OP" bought the truck? Also, I would love to do this, but ever since Covid, around here in the Midwest where I am located, the aftermarket places have jacked up the prices for supercharging and tuning!  

Edited by TNTSierra

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,769 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...