Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have Nitto Terra Grapplers on it now.  Smooth as silk with not a hint of vibration.  Very slight hum compared to the stock tires but they ride great otherwise.

Posted

Thanks, good to know that Nitto's may work if the Conti's need to get swapped out.  are you running 20" wheels?

Posted
19 hours ago, rlme36 said:

Thanks, good to know that Nitto's may work if the Conti's need to get swapped out.  are you running 20" wheels?

Yes, 20" wheels

Posted (edited)

Installed 2 new replacement tires today for the rear, dealer said the RF was LR was 19 and RR was 34.  Drove home on hitting the magic # of 70 and still feel a vibe.  As it stands now

LF is 29

RF is 27

LR is 19

RR is 34 

 

Called Discount tire to see what their thoughts were and they are going to Road force balance a replacement tire on their end to get the low 20's and then ship out to me to swap out the RR tire.  To some degree i wonder if the stock rancho shocks are having an impact on the results as they have 42K miles on them at this point, I purchased the truck with 41,3xx.  I wanted to get the tires sorted before I intro a new variable like new shocks, already did the research/searched the forum and have Bilstein 5100 in a box waiting on install.

Edited by rlme36
Posted

Well, got the last new replacement tire installed today to swap out the 34 from the RR, the new RR value is 21 road force.  I do feel a little something, but its much better than it was in the beginning, amazed at how sensitive these trucks are to RF values.  Will use the truck for a long tow in a few weeks, which will hopefully go without issues.

Posted

Centramatic’s, no more issues on either tires summer or winter and you can forego useless balancing weights. Had mine on since December, even the dealer drooled over the smooth ride. Could just be me though. ;)

Posted
3 hours ago, BigWhiteMastadon said:

Centramatic’s, no more issues on either tires summer or winter and you can forego useless balancing weights. Had mine on since December, even the dealer drooled over the smooth ride. Could just be me though. ;)

interested to hear/learn more about these.  Seems like short money to make all the tire vibe issues people are having go away.   

Posted

I’ll answer any real world questions you have. I saw these on some tractor trucks and got to chatting with several of them. Decided to try these. Rather amazing. One side effect that may put some off, they are filled in the edges with beads and at low speeds with windows open you will here a constant swishing sound. Tires and handling noticeably improved especially in corners. Good mileage as well. In town I’m only getting 17km/l but highway runs 10-12km/l. Just thought some of you might enjoy them. 

Posted
On 4/24/2019 at 8:50 AM, rlme36 said:

Installed 2 new replacement tires today for the rear, dealer said the RF was LR was 19 and RR was 34.  Drove home on hitting the magic # of 70 and still feel a vibe.  As it stands now

LF is 29

RF is 27

LR is 19

RR is 34 

 

Called Discount tire to see what their thoughts were and they are going to Road force balance a replacement tire on their end to get the low 20's and then ship out to me to swap out the RR tire.  To some degree i wonder if the stock rancho shocks are having an impact on the results as they have 42K miles on them at this point, I purchased the truck with 41,3xx.  I wanted to get the tires sorted before I intro a new variable like new shocks, already did the research/searched the forum and have Bilstein 5100 in a box waiting on install.

Bilstein will help alot.....

Posted
On 5/1/2019 at 9:51 AM, BigWhiteMastadon said:

I’ll answer any real world questions you have. I saw these on some tractor trucks and got to chatting with several of them. Decided to try these. Rather amazing. One side effect that may put some off, they are filled in the edges with beads and at low speeds with windows open you will here a constant swishing sound. Tires and handling noticeably improved especially in corners. Good mileage as well. In town I’m only getting 17km/l but highway runs 10-12km/l. Just thought some of you might enjoy them. 

Did you really mean km/l or are the numbers L/100 km?

 

Centramatics are also used by some in the touring motorcycle world.

Dyna Beads (and others) is another style of balancing product - beads installed in tire, instead of installing a centramatics style ring. 

 

 

Posted

Hahahahahahaha All thumbs. Anyway I really like these Centramatic thingies, just threw the original rubber back on for the summer and the guys at the shop were eager to know how the ride was over the winter without adding weights to the wheels. I let them go for a spin. ;) They seemed to enjoy the ride. Then once the summer rubber was on again I sent them out again for comparison. Anyway, enough if that. 

Posted

I'm having this problem on my '09 dually.  I had 3 bad tires on the rear so I put 6 new tires on the truck (old tires had 38k on them).  Took it to multiple shops for months until tires were finally deemed out of spec.  Vibrations/shakes are already starting again, had the tires balanced last weekend and then road forced yesterday as well as an alignment done.  Tires probably don't even have 6k on them yet.  I've got around 1,000lbs of wheel weights in the bed so adding weight does nothing.  If anything I'm starting to believe that having a load is whats causing the tires to go bad even though I'm no where near under inflated.  I thought maybe it was because I was running a different size than stock but from all I can find the tires and rim combination should work, at least if I really do have a 6.5" wide rim.  Regardless the rim size requirements between stock tire size and the one I'm using only vary by 0.5 inches.  Everyone tells me my truck rides fine, it's dually they ride rough.  It's not the rough ride it's the dang shake/vibration :banghead: Another reason I think it's the tires is like you, when they're warmed up it gets worse.  Plus if I increase the tire pressure the shake/vibration lessens some.  Good luck to you.

Posted

What pressures inner back vs outer back? Insides should be 3-5 psi less. That said a good bump can throw them out.

 

I’ve mentioned Centramatic’s before as they don’t care about issues with tire and wheel, they balance on the fly. Your mileage may vary. ;)

Posted (edited)

I’m ready to try centramtics, but how do they help with high RF values?

Edited by bimmerboy318
Posted

You mean balanced on Road Force? Don’t bother.

 

I have no weights on any wheels, summers or winters, the Centramatic’s are dynamic and forever adjusting. You get a swish sound starting out until just shy of 40km/h then silence. Sound won’t return until you drop below about 17km/h. The sound is the result of all those beads/bearings in the disks waiting for physics to tell them where they need to be. 

 

Best thing I’ve bought in years. Either around town or on the highway, they really help the truck feel grounded and offer the smoothest rotation of the wheel/tire possible and constantly updating. 

 

Glad I stumbled across them and really appreciative of the people who provided positive views of the product when I asked them. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...