Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2022 LTD 8 spd shift is undetectable unless I manually down shift which  I do at  times descending steeps mountain roads up here. They must have reprogrammed the LTD and since this is first run of trail boss 2.7 setup they got it right. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I just drove it to get my new tags at the county courthouse and going saw 22.1 mpg @60 mph into a 40 mph wind. On way back @60 mph saw 28.2 MPH with same wind on relatively flat road. It has almost 600 miles on the odometer now. Love this thing.  Its 748 lbs more than the Honda Ridgeline Sport  AWD. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the “it’s a 4cyl” guys have been shut up. Sure we would all love the sound of a V8 but other than that, that’s about all we are missing over the 5.3. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I can't hear much anymore unless I have my VA issued hearing aids in. When I do have them installed in the ears its ( 2022 LTD 2.7 T L3B)  still quiet!   I did hear a rock that stuck in between the RR rotor and pads....LOL  

Posted (edited)
On 12/2/2021 at 2:10 PM, customboss said:

Not sure why one needs the 10 speed, so far  8 speed flawless. Early days maybe but the Dexos HP most likely will solve most issues. 

 

Because the 10 does everything the 8 does , but slightly better.  This is no knock on the 8 , as my 2016 Sierra had the 8 speed and it was perfect . . 

Edited by f8l vnm
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, f8l vnm said:

Because the 10 does everything the 8 does , but slightly better.  This is no knock on the 8 , as my 2016 Sierra had the 8 speed and it was perfect . . 

Think you posted that same post a few days ago. I would be happy with either but in the trail boss until 2022 you couldn't even get a 2.7T L3B and thats what I wanted. 

 

I DO think they have reprogrammed this 2022 LTD Trail Boss Custom vs what I have read earlier versions.

 

I wanted basic not the bells and whistles.  2 extra gears not worth waiting for me.   

Posted
55 minutes ago, f8l vnm said:

Because the 10 does everything the 8 does , but slightly better.  This is no knock on the 8 , as my 2016 Sierra had the 8 speed and it was perfect . . 

Is it mainly fuel economy the 10 speed does better?  I know some say the 10 speed shifts smoother but seems like the 8 speed with the new fluid can shift fairly smooth as well.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SilveradoRST said:

Is it mainly fuel economy the 10 speed does better?  I know some say the 10 speed shifts smoother but seems like the 8 speed with the new fluid can shift fairly smooth as well.  

 

I would say a little better Fuel Economy , little better acceleration .  Again not a huge difference but i'm sure eventually all of our rucks will have the 10 like Ford has already done.  I just want to reiterate i have zero issues with the 8 speed but the only reason the 10 came out was to improve on an already good thing.  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, f8l vnm said:

 

I would say a little better Fuel Economy , little better acceleration .  Again not a huge difference but i'm sure eventually all of our rucks will have the 10 like Ford has already done.  I just want to reiterate i have zero issues with the 8 speed but the only reason the 10 came out was to improve on an already good thing.  

Fully agree however I gave up my RUCK in 1989 before the USN and ARMY could try to kill me more.....LOL    

 

Cheers 

Posted
3 hours ago, customboss said:

Think you posted that same post a few days ago. I would be happy with either but in the trail boss until 2022 you couldn't even get a 2.7T L3B and thats what I wanted. 

 

I DO think they have reprogrammed this 2022 LTD Trail Boss Custom vs what I have read earlier versions.

 

I wanted basic not the bells and whistles.  2 extra gears not worth waiting for me.   

I totally get it mate and you got yourself the updated 420 LB feet of torque monster  :) We have a couple of 2019/2020 2.7's in our farm fleet and the guys all love them.  Zero issues with hauling 1500+ lbs 4-5 days a week . 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, customboss said:

Fully agree however I gave up my RUCK in 1989 before the USN and ARMY could try to kill me more.....LOL    

 

Cheers 

😁 Cheers mate 

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/7/2021 at 8:27 PM, lwmajor said:

What kind of MPG are you getting with that set up ?

12-14.  Only went about 100 miles

  • Like 1
Posted

We have been driving our 2022 Silverado 2.7 Turbo for 400 miles. Mixed city and highway with 17mpg average.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

On MPG optimization with this engine (L3B) design, it is tuned to perform like a spark ignited diesel with associated low RPM TQ (1500-3000 RPM) so if you are throttling it like a V6 or V8 it may feel good but you might be wasting the good TQ with low fuel burn capability. 

 

310 HP is plenty to keep the unit in motion but 348 or 420 ft lbs of TQ available at 1500 rpm means you need almost no throttle and let that dual volute turbo do its work. 

 

I am a former HD diesel OEM  R&D engineer and we focused on the optimization of VGT turbos to make lots of tq and hp out of lower displacements with boost and DI fuels injection. 

 

I filled up for second time yesterday using 85 octane CENEX gasolines. 20.74 mpg average.

 

I let that turbo and Tq to pull me ahead with 1500 RPM range to accelerate. I don't tow but I am in a 2022 Trail Boss Custom 4X4 that operates at very high altitudes, cold ( single digits in AM or nights, rough mountain gravel roads, slick icy, snowy, high wind 2 lane highways), I am in and out of Autotrac, 2WD, 4WD so far in 729 miles.  I changed out the oil for optimum wear-in reasons @ 592 miles to effect better more optimized break in. 

The QS full syn dexos1 gen 2 installed is probably lower quality than the OEM fill that I believe was Dexos1 Gen 3. However cleanliness is key for why wear in technique. 

 

On the flat with winds whipping in and out of 10-20 mph mostly cross winds I see :

 

25 mpg @ 45-50 mph

22 mpg @ 65 mph

21 mpg @70 mph 

 

Think about the turbo being your throttle not fuel flow. Focus on torque unless you just want to waste fuel and go fast or tow fast. 

 

My 2 cents. Not gospel. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by customboss

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...