Jump to content

8 speed is gone for 2020


Recommended Posts

Posted

^^ Already Called my dealership. Couldn’t cancel the order as it was passed the window to do so, but they said it wouldn’t be a problem to sell the truck I ordered and put in a new order for a 2020. So I will most likely go that route. They were definitely not thrilled with my decision change but for $50K of my money, the LT Trailboss with a 6.2/10 Speed would definitely be the way to go.

Just so everyone knows....

LT Trailboss with 6.2 - 10 Speed is a $2495 Option for the 2020. My sales manager went on the program to build a 2020 and said Chevy HAS NOT opened up orders yet for the 2020 Trailboss with a 6.2 / 10 Speed Just yet. Orders for the 2020 Trailboss can be taken now only with the 5.3. He is going to check back weekly to let me know once the 6.2 order option is available.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
On 5/23/2019 at 1:39 PM, Moend said:

good to hear, I thought I am going to be stock with an odd ball of a truck that no one want to buy when its time to sell it.
Thank you guys!

You should enjoy your new beast instead of being worried of selling her later ?

By the way, I'm curious about having 10-speed on 5.3L, specially with lower axel ratios. I'm not sure about necessity of having 10 forward gear sets on 5.3L. I can see the benefit on 6.2L or even Ford's 6 calendar turbo with higher hp and torque, but not on 5.3L and smaller naturally aspirated engines. 

I believe GM is just trying to have one transmission for all trucks in near future just from business standpoint, not technical aspects. Of course, they sell it more expensive with less hassle of different varieties. 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, AMPRG said:

You should enjoy your new beast instead of being worried of selling her later ?

By the way, I'm curious about having 10-speed on 5.3L, specially with lower axel ratios. I'm not sure about necessity of having 10 forward gear sets on 5.3L. I can see the benefit on 6.2L or even Ford's 6 calendar turbo with higher hp and torque, but not on 5.3L and smaller naturally aspirated engines. 

I believe GM is just trying to have one transmission for all trucks in near future just from business standpoint, not technical aspects. Of course, they sell it more expensive with less hassle of different varieties. 

 

I'm not following. Wouldn't it be better to have more gears paired to a smaller engine with less horsepower and torque to help it stay in its normal power band more and thus get better performance and fuel economy? 

Posted
On 5/30/2019 at 8:56 AM, GJM32387 said:

My 19LT Trailboss build date is 6/17. This just makes me want to try to cancel and order a 2020 with the 6.2 and 10Speed. F**K

Unless you want to pay at least $10K more. Now you have a lot of incentives. For sure you won't have them for 2020 until Christmas or even March 2020, plus more expensive transmission / configuration! 

Posted
Just now, Cpl_Punishment said:

I'm not following. Wouldn't it be better to have more gears paired to a smaller engine with less horsepower and torque to help it stay in its normal power band more and thus get better performance and fuel economy? 

In my opinion, not necessarily. Due to less hp and torque, the transmission has to put more efforts to adjust needed power. Remember, fuel economy with higher gear sets comes in place during higher speed cruising conditions. That will make the engine to operate in lower rpm when not much demand exists. For stop-and-go driving conditions or towing, that won't do any magic. Usually, the gear ratios of the first 4 to 6 gears are very similar between 8 and 10 speed. If you look at the mpg for both current 5.3L-A8 and 6.2L-A10, you'll notice my reason for City and combined mpg. Besides that, if you use regular octane fuel instead of recommended 91 or higher in 6.2L, mpg will go down dramatically. 

As I mentioned before, I see this just as GM's business game ?

Posted
On 5/30/2019 at 10:35 AM, Gagliano7 said:

Ford also lets you get any of there motors in the lower trims and reg cab.

They let you get the High Output version of the 3.5EB in any trim now?

Posted

Has anyone confirmed if the 5.3 10speed option will have the 2speed transfer case as standard, just like the 6.2 is now?

Posted
On 6/14/2019 at 6:43 PM, HondaHawkGT said:

They let you get the High Output version of the 3.5EB in any trim now?

Not positive on that but you can get the 5.0 in any trim. I just looked and you can get the 3.5 in any trim but not reg cab short bed.. The 5.0 in any cab or trim.

Posted
On 6/14/2019 at 12:47 PM, AMPRG said:

In my opinion, not necessarily. Due to less hp and torque, the transmission has to put more efforts to adjust needed power. Remember, fuel economy with higher gear sets comes in place during higher speed cruising conditions. That will make the engine to operate in lower rpm when not much demand exists. For stop-and-go driving conditions or towing, that won't do any magic. Usually, the gear ratios of the first 4 to 6 gears are very similar between 8 and 10 speed. If you look at the mpg for both current 5.3L-A8 and 6.2L-A10, you'll notice my reason for City and combined mpg. Besides that, if you use regular octane fuel instead of recommended 91 or higher in 6.2L, mpg will go down dramatically. 

As I mentioned before, I see this just as GM's business game ?

My friend has the ford f150 with the 5.0 and 10 speed and that thing is an animal. The 10 speed keeps in the optimal rpm. He is also averaging 18 mpg on E85.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel $5.42 at the truck stop on the hi-way
    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
    • Next Friday will be my 6 week point from my right knee replacement.  The surgeon says it will be fine if I choose to drive after this checkup.  I know I could drive now but best to do as my surgeon (and my wife) tell me.  Richard compared being 62 to 72.  I remember when I was in my early 60's I was experiencing slow but regular decline in my mobility.  Thanks to good medical support,  i continued to fight the speed and spread of this decline. During my 60's I worked on non-surgical methods and just when I turned 70, my orthopedic surgeon recommended joint replacements.  In a little over a year, I had one shoulder and both knees replaced.  This hasn't been a terribly fun experience, but worth the discomfort as my future mobility health trajectory has reversed.  It is a treat to now be watching my mobility. balance and confidence steadily improve!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...