Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Holy smokes... UPS plane crashed in Kentucky. It looks like people were hurt. :(

 

What the heck is going on - more planes have fallen out of the sky in the last year...

 

Maybe the FAA shouldn't have been Doge'd, maybe pay shouldn't be withheld from ATC's. I'm not saying that's the cause but it sure as heck isn't helping bolster safety.

  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Atlas said:

Holy smokes... UPS plane crashed in Kentucky. It looks like people were hurt. :(

 

What the heck is going on - more planes have fallen out of the sky in the last year...

 

Maybe the FAA shouldn't have been Doge'd, maybe pay shouldn't be withheld from ATC's. I'm not saying that's the cause but it sure as heck isn't helping bolster safety.

I retired from American Airlines and we were worried 20 years ago about quality pilots that were scratching and sniffing to claw way to majors. The military feed and critical screening is long gone. You make more $$ and get better lifestyle being in military than a pro pilot. We are getting bare minimum quality. I’m sure AI will correct all this need for professionalism. 🥹 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

Holy smokes... UPS plane crashed in Kentucky. It looks like people were hurt. :(

 

What the heck is going on - more planes have fallen out of the sky in the last year...

 

Maybe the FAA shouldn't have been Doge'd, maybe pay shouldn't be withheld from ATC's. I'm not saying that's the cause but it sure as heck isn't helping bolster safety.

MD-11 a tricky jet to fly especially heavy ON TAKEOFF. We sold FEDEX and UPS ours when 777 finally showed up. 
Both have crashed them more frequently than any should have. Shelter in place a pretty serious order! Gee.  
 

https://www.lpm.org/news/2025-11-04/shelter-in-place-issued-in-louisville-following-reports-of-plane-crash

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, customboss said:

MD-11 a tricky jet to fly especially heavy ON TAKEOFF. We sold FEDEX and UPS ours when 777 finally showed up. 
Both have crashed them more frequently than any should have. Shelter in place a pretty serious order! Gee.  
 

https://www.lpm.org/news/2025-11-04/shelter-in-place-issued-in-louisville-following-reports-of-plane-crash

 

 

That sound serious. Also terrifying to think AI could be responsible for flying a plane someday - or would it reduce errors? I don't know. I've heard nothing good about people trying to make their way up the chain being commercial pilots. It's a tough gig, all-consuming, and the pay isn't there like it used to be.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

That sound serious. Also terrifying to think AI could be responsible for flying a plane someday - or would it reduce errors? I don't know. I've heard nothing good about people trying to make their way up the chain being commercial pilots. It's a tough gig, all-consuming, and the pay isn't there like it used to be.

Seriously, hauling cargo and boxes going automated. As soon as the tech bros buy off the administration. PS AA never crashed a MD11. 

Posted
9 hours ago, txab said:

 

Looking at a takeoff catastrophic LH engine fire and seems the crew forgot to fly the jet. Fires are terrible and usually you don’t want to take it into air but he ran outta runway. Full of fuel. Vertical stab is a fuel tank too.  

Posted
On 11/4/2025 at 11:40 PM, txab said:

 

 

I saw last night the death toll is now 12 with 16 missing. Crew was only 3. That was allot of fuel. Will be interesting what the authorities find out. Truly sad event. 

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I saw last night the death toll is now 12 with 16 missing. Crew was only 3. That was allot of fuel. Will be interesting what the authorities find out. Truly sad event. 

40,000 gallons if I recall. 

Edited by customboss
Posted

Interesting that the FAA decided the day after the crash to reduce commercial flights by 10%, stating they are doing it to maintain air safety. Pray for our air traffic controllers in these difficult times. They need relief.

  • Sad 1
Posted

IMG_0486.thumb.jpeg.c2d24ba890d6e53c63c41a7da2b8b3e9.jpeg

 

By Josh Evans 

 

Stephens Ford Flathead OHV conversion is one of the rarest and most fascinating performance adaptations ever developed for Ford’s famous Flathead V8. During the late 1940s and early 1950s, before Ford introduced its own overhead-valve engines, several independent engineers and speed equipment companies designed conversions to give the side-valve Flathead more breathing ability. Among these innovators was Bill Stephens, who developed a unique overhead-valve (OHV) cylinder head conversion that dramatically improved the Flathead’s performance and efficiency while maintaining its original block design.

Stephens’ conversion was designed to solve one of the Flathead’s biggest limitations restricted airflow caused by its valve-in-block layout. By moving the valves to the cylinder heads, the conversion allowed for more efficient combustion, higher compression ratios, and increased power output. The system replaced the original L-head cast-iron heads with custom aluminum heads that featured pushrod-actuated overhead valves, a rocker shaft assembly, and redesigned combustion chambers. This gave the Flathead characteristics similar to later overhead-valve V8s while retaining the iconic Ford block.

The Stephens OHV setup was produced in extremely limited numbers, primarily for racing applications and high-performance enthusiasts. It was seen as a competitor to other conversions of the era, such as the Ardun (designed by Zora Arkus-Duntov) and the Navarro OHV kits. However, the Stephens design was unique because it used a crossflow configuration, meaning the intake and exhaust ports were on opposite sides of the head, improving airflow and reducing heat buildup a common issue with traditional Flatheads.

Mechanically, a Stephens-converted Flathead could easily produce over 160 to 200 horsepower, depending on compression and carburetion a major improvement over the roughly 100 horsepower of the stock engine. Builders often paired the conversion with dual or triple carburetors, a high-lift camshaft, and custom headers to take full advantage of the improved breathing. The result was a smooth, powerful, and durable engine capable of competing with early overhead-valve V8s from Cadillac and Oldsmobile.

Today, a Ford Flathead with a Stephens OHV conversion is considered an extremely rare and valuable piece of hot rod history. Few complete examples survive, and when they appear at shows or auctions, they draw significant attention from collectors and historians. The Stephens conversion stands as a testament to the ingenuity of early American engine builders, who pushed the limits of what was possible with the original Ford Flathead design long before factory overhead-valve engines became the norm.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

To whom, your "false... fairytale" God?

 

Atheist I assume. An Agnostic believes he exist but doesn't care about his creation? Am I close?  

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Looks like UPS and FedEx grounded their fleets of MD-11, at least temporarily. Antiques that probably should have been retired years ago. But UPS especially penny pinches like nobody else. Have a few friends there and it does take a tragedy to get anything fixed. 🙄

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,677 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...