Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't think it's a Silverado thing, I think all the vehicles with the new Freon don't cool nearly as well, or at least as fast.  It seems to take forever for them to start to blow cold air out of the vents. 

Posted
1 hour ago, mafd2 said:

It's a Taylor. You can get them at an A/C appliance store or ebay/Amazon.  Maybe Lowes or Home Depot. I have 2; a dial and digital type. I use one in home and one in my truck. I check calibration and are spot on. Just clip in your vent.

Screenshot_2019-07-10-08-14-45-1.png

Screenshot_2019-07-10-08-16-55-1.png

Thank you Taylor most helpful . Will purchase today 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Las Vegas here.

 

Yesterday it was 106 here. Had the A/C at max fan speed and I felt fine. 

 

Did take a while to cool the truck, but I also think its because its a huge interior space.

 

Once the AC ran for a while, I felt great.

 

Also, I have ceramic tint all the way around, including a very light shade in the windshield. Makes a MASSIVE difference. 

Edited by Sin City Trail Boss
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mandalorian said:

 

Did not know that about Ram, but not a huge surprise. The A/C in the last gen was average at best. The new F-150s though, are pretty great in that department equipped with the automatic climate control.

The Ram guys seem to think it involves the blend of the HVAC.  Some of them are using home plumbing materials to reroute coolant in essence blocking off  or restricting coolant flow to the heater core.  Those who have done it claim their air is much colder somewhere to the tune of 20 degrees.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I've got a crew cab and I live in Alabama.  My A/C works just fine.  Regularly above 90 outside and I'm sure above 100 in the truck when I get in.  I remote start on the walk out to help a little though.  

 

One of the bigger reasons I got rid of my last car (2010 Hyundai Genesis) was because the A/C took about 10-15 minutes to cool off the car in the summer even when driving at 60 mph.  Heaven forbid I get stopped at a light.. I might as well have just turned the A/C off.  It wouldn't have felt any hotter.  Now, by the time I get to the first light after leaving our parking lot the air is cold and the truck is comfortable soon after.  

 

I do wish they push a little more air to the back, even if its not in the form of 2 separate climate zones.  My kids sometimes complain of being hot while my wife and I are ready to turn the temp on the controller up a degree or two.

Edited by ndking1126
Posted
9 hours ago, Foghorn17 said:

While I don't have a T series truck....yet.  I'm glad to hear that for the most part AC performance is being reported as it is.  I've been reading on the RAM forums and that is one big issue that 19 Ram owners are having.  AC vent temps at only 60 degrees F.

 

https://5thgenrams.com/community/threads/air-conditioning-performance.990/

 

I am fortunate that I live where it doesn't become oppressively hot very often, but sweltering in my truck is not on my bucket list.  AC that actually works is a good thing.  Always had good luck with GM AC performance; glad to hear for the most part AC appears to be okay on the new trucks.

60° is ok for a home HVAC but not a vehicle. We have a RAM at work and it never was cold from new. 55° at best.

Posted

It was 100° out this afternoon with 110° heat index. Interior was 125°. Interior cooled down fairly quickly and I was getting 38°-40° out the vents which is colder than my '16 Sierra which ran 42°-44°.

20190710_142341.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

There have been a few times where my RST does not blow cold air right away. Others have reported this, too. I've been able to fix this by turning the AC off, then back on, and then the cool air comes rushing in through the excellent blowers on the system. 

 

I'm coming from a 2007 LT 1500 with cloth seats, so take this FWIW... but I feel the leather on these 2019 trucks does not breath much at all. I don't have ventilated seats, unfortunately, and when the sun hits that dark leather, they do not cool fast. My backside is pretty warm in these 100º Texas days lately. It will give you the feeling like the AC isn't working hard or cool enough. 

Posted
6 hours ago, SILVER SLED said:

I don't think it's a Silverado thing, I think all the vehicles with the new Freon don't cool nearly as well, or at least as fast.  It seems to take forever for them to start to blow cold air out of the vents. 

Yeah most new vehicles use HFO-1234yf now. I think GM started using it in some vehicles back around 2013 but just switched the trucks to it in 2017.

Posted

It only takes longer when it’s really hot, often the case in south Texas. My vehicles range from 92-17. The new one cools a bit quicker, only because the condenser is cleaner. All will freeze you out after a few minutes. I think I have all Freon covered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, HondaHawkGT said:

Yeah most new vehicles use HFO-1234yf now. I think GM started using it in some vehicles back around 2013 but just switched the trucks to it in 2017.

Well maybe it is a Silverado thing then, because my truck starts blowing cold air quickly.  The ‘19 new styles we have as loaners seem to take a long time to just start blowing cold out the vents.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

Well maybe it is a Silverado thing then, because my truck starts blowing cold air quickly.  The ‘19 new styles we have as loaners seem to take a long time to just start blowing cold out the vents.  

I didn't mean to say that it is or isn't. My 2019 seems to take about a minute to startvthrowing cold air. I just assumed its because the truck is parked in the sun and the evaporator takes a little more time to get to normal operating temp. I don't know how the R1234yf systems compare to the R134a version in terms of operating performance.

Posted
On ‎7‎/‎9‎/‎2019 at 1:44 PM, mafd2 said:

The high fan speed helps move air around better but the air is not as cold with the blower on high as the air is rushing through the evaporator too fast. The lower the fan speed the colder the air will be out of the vents. Don't turn the recirculate on if your truck has been sitting in the hot sun all day because on recirculate it's sucking the 120° interior temp through the system taking it that much longer to cool down. With recirculate off the system is sucking the outside air instead of the hot cabin air. Once the interior cools down, then turn the recirculate on. It'll stay cold and run more efficient because the cabin air is cool and is recirculating.

Or you can open the windows for two minutes with the recirculation on, fan 50% and do the same thing. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Or you can open the windows for two minutes with the recirculation on, fan 50% and do the same thing. 

Absolutely, I stated that in a previous post about rolling windows down letting the hot interior air escape. My post though was in reference to a member stating the that the recirculate must be on for maximum cooling. True but not when cabin air is 120°f. Once interior is cooled down, recirculate gives maximum cooling.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,881 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...