Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 9/9/2019 at 5:40 PM, CamGTP said:

You can't calibrate/alter these computers so a different throttle body can't be used.

 

I think the intake design is cool and looks good but why wouldn't GM engineers just call you up if you somehow gained up to 2mpg that they couldn't?

This.  I call complete BS on the MPG/HP gain claims.  "Up to" leaves a lot of wiggle room to blame the user when it doesn't happen.

Posted

Coming from the flipping the air cleaner lid to open air cleaner later cowl induction to cold air on fuel injection engines. I realized one thing recently. No truck manufacturer is going to leave that much HP on the table. Especially when one of the first things in their ads are HP-TQ ratings. All they have to do is increase the snorkel and the fender opening if more air is needed. How are you going to increase fuel mileage if you’re engine can pull enough air to hit 5K RPMs and you’re cruising RPMs much lower. Yea I bought it for many years. Buy truck, change exhaust, check, cold air intake, check, foolish, check. Now if you want noise, different.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Coming from the flipping the air cleaner lid to open air cleaner later cowl induction to cold air on fuel injection engines. I realized one thing recently. No truck manufacturer is going to leave that much HP on the table. Especially when one of the first things in their ads are HP-TQ ratings. All they have to do is increase the snorkel and the fender opening if more air is needed. How are you going to increase fuel mileage if you’re engine can pull enough air to hit 5K RPMs and you’re cruising RPMs much lower. Yea I bought it for many years. Buy truck, change exhaust, check, cold air intake, check, foolish, check. Now if you want noise, different.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've said that about any "cai".  GM didn't spend all that money designing a 375hp (5.3) motor for example,  only to throw an intake system together that loses 20 hp and lowers mileage accordingly.

  • Like 1
Posted

The Roto-fab CAI for the 6th gen Camaro received the same kind of skepticism, but after thousands of units sold and over a hundred independent dyno tests, it is now recognized worldwide to be the best CAI available for 6th gen Camaro. We expect the same to happen with the Silverado/Sierra. 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, 570590 said:

Are the gains advertised for a 5.3 or 6.2? 

5.3L

Posted

We are excited to announce that we plan to start shipping the 2019-2020 Silverado/Sierra 1500 Cold Air Intake systems on Monday 9/30/2019!! Retail price will be $499.95 for this system. For more information, visit www.roto-fab.com

Posted
1 hour ago, Roto-fab said:

We are excited to announce that we plan to start shipping the 2019-2020 Silverado/Sierra 1500 Cold Air Intake systems on Monday 9/30/2019!! Retail price will be $499.95 for this system. For more information, visit www.roto-fab.com

Tell me why your system is better at $499.95 than K&N at $435.99 that claims higher gains? 

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, 570590 said:

Tell me why your system is better at $499.95 than K&N at $435.99 that claims higher gains? 

That’s a good question.  We haven’t tested our competitors’ intake system, so I will focus more on what we have learned during our testing and development of this intake system as well as others. First, here are some things to consider when comparing and/or evaluating dyno numbers:

 

1)      Dyno numbers vary

2)      “Back to back” testing without the vehicle thoroughly learning a new system is useless information

3)      Manufacturer’s claims along with results from as many sources as possible should be used to evaluate a system.

 

The first point will always be true because the large number of variables involved.

 

The second point is one most people don’t understand. Straight “back to back” testing of an intake either on a dyno or at the track is not an accurate way to test. The testing is not accurate until after the engine management system has “learned” the intake.

 

The third and most important point is a tough one since this particular vehicle is relatively new to the market. With the 2016+ Camaro SS as well as the ZL1, we don’t have the highest horsepower claims among aftermarket air intake manufacturers.  However, after time on the market and countless test results from many of the best tuners in the country and abroad, it’s very safe to say we have the best performing intake available for those applications. In fact, this same principle holds true with virtually every intake we offer. We don’t have the highest horsepower claims in any market. Nonetheless, when the systems have been on the market for a year or two and all the new hype settles, our intake systems are recognized by most as the top performing intake available for the application. We know how our new Silverado/Sierra 1500 intake performs and we fully expect the same conclusion to be drawn with this system.

 

Your question was in regards to horsepower gains. In addition to performance, our system is constructed using high quality components, sounds great, looks very clean under the hood and fits the truck as it should. We also offer great customer service and we are here if you want to talk to us-both before and after the sale.

 

Edited by Roto-fab
Posted
2 hours ago, Roto-fab said:

That’s a good question.  We haven’t tested our competitors’ intake system, so I will focus more on what we have learned during our testing and development of this intake system as well as others. First, here are some things to consider when comparing and/or evaluating dyno numbers:

 

1)      Dyno numbers vary

2)      “Back to back” testing without the vehicle thoroughly learning a new system is useless information

3)      Manufacturer’s claims along with results from as many sources as possible should be used to evaluate a system.

 

The first point will always be true because the large number of variables involved.

 

The second point is one most people don’t understand. Straight “back to back” testing of an intake either on a dyno or at the track is not an accurate way to test. The testing is not accurate until after the engine management system has “learned” the intake.

 

The third and most important point is a tough one since this particular vehicle is relatively new to the market. With the 2016+ Camaro SS as well as the ZL1, we don’t have the highest horsepower claims among aftermarket air intake manufacturers.  However, after time on the market and countless test results from many of the best tuners in the country and abroad, it’s very safe to say we have the best performing intake available for those applications. In fact, this same principle holds true with virtually every intake we offer. We don’t have the highest horsepower claims in any market. Nonetheless, when the systems have been on the market for a year or two and all the new hype settles, our intake systems are recognized by most as the top performing intake available for the application. We know how our new Silverado/Sierra 1500 intake performs and we fully expect the same conclusion to be drawn with this system.

 

Your question was in regards to horsepower gains. In addition to performance, our system is constructed using high quality components, sounds great, looks very clean under the hood and fits the truck as it should. We also offer great customer service and we are here if you want to talk to us-both before and after the sale.

 

If you would be kind enough to send me one I will provide detailed daily feedback on it is performing!!!!!!!!!   

Posted

I will be providing feedback as my order goes in on Monday [emoji16]. I have their system in my Camaro. City driving I didn’t really see any real change in gas mileage (don’t care). Highway comparing two long trips (1 being the same route Indy to Bowling Green), with the roto-fab I seen a 1 mpg gain (23 to 24 mpg).

Can’t wait to get mine [emoji1360]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks everyone for your interest in this CAI system! The order link is live at www.roto-fab.com and at Roto-fab Authorized Retailers! 

 

Order Link:

https://www.roto-fab.com/products/make/gmc

 

The link includes Silverado & Sierra 1500 - 5.3L & 6.2L. CAI systems are scheduled to start shipping on 9/30/19.

Edited by Roto-fab
  • Like 1
Posted

A group buy would have been nice of you to offer but please don’t now, unless I would be entitled to a partial refund. ?

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Mine was just delivered [emoji16]

And I am sitting at work [emoji35]

3866bca9e1cd936fb43f5f2a22a81835.jpg


Ryan B.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So speaking of oil consumption with my L8T as I just changed the oil yesterday and made the switch over to Amsoil SS 0W-40 from the Mobil 1  5W-30 Truck and SUV I just dropped out. 2900 miles on that oil as well as  68 hours on that oil ( so used to equipment with an hour meter and that becomes valuable information to compare with others as well ). Once again the oil use was so very little, I am going to say it dropped under 1/16 of an inch on the dipstick. No towing was done and this interval was from early spring until now.    One interesting item to note is that going by the 5 quart jugs I was using before from Mobil, it was showing that I was putting in 8 US quarts to bring it to full if not slightly over the full mark according to their jug markings. Granted I did allow more drain time this time and in part because the engine oil was only lukewarm as I started it and let it idle and not for long enough to get the oil itself hot ( the engine was up to operating temp ). The oil in that state just seemed to take forever for it to drip out but not only at the drain plug but at the oil filter housing as well, perhaps I had never quite gotten all the oil out before and I could have still waited longer but as it was I waited well over 3 hours. I think next time if I have the time I will do an experiment by dropping the oil and lets say leave the pan under it for 15 minutes, then switch to another pail and let it drip out overnight and measure how much more oil comes out. So this time and yes I ended up getting it just over the full mark as I was experimenting with trying to get the level to the add mark after I had run it and then waited some and then added a bit and waited for a certain amount of time for it to settle to the add mark. I very well may not have waited long enough for that experiment but I got to the add mark, then dumped in a full quart and waited some and checked and then waited some more and it crept up more ... and then finally oops, it was slightly over full some hours later when it really had settled all it would. I find this engine sure takes time for the last bit of oil that gets poured in to finally make its way into the crank case. I can only guess at how much too much I added as per maybe a 1/10th of a quart. I had poured in 8.5 quarts going by the quart containers as per 8 quarts and 16 us ounces. I was shocked at how much this was off compared to the prior oil changes and if those larger jugs and they are not marked accurately enough or they contain slightly more than what they say, or the drain time factor made that much of a difference. But I know on this forum there have been others who have said they have put well over 8 quarts in their L8T and now I have also going by the Amsoil true quart containers. Its a confusing convoluted mess up here in Canada with some oil manufactures packaging is in true US quarts, some is also in true US quarts containers on an even number of quarts but also marked in liters which becomes the odd ball volume of a fractional amount of liters. Then there is the Liters only containers, no US markings as its a true metric container and only measured in Liters to an even number of Liters. But remember we used to have Imperial Gallons and Imperial quarts as well !. 
    • Holy smokes. Clearly not a deal on that truck. I just mean in general, matte or painted trim is becoming more normative than chrome, but I know the Black Optics packages on various vehicles are being sold as uplevel trims. They look really good, but sheesh. It's just paint and plastic.
    • I Wouldn't Know Where to Begin    Oh I know where I would begin but I'm just one of over eight billion people on this rock. Eight billion versions of where the goal post is. How large it should be. How far to kick from. What ball is the right ball. Elevation. Age.....are you getting the point? It isn't about disagreeing with one individual. It's about agreeing only with one individual. One's self.   Agreement comes when multiple people hold the same point already. THAT is the goal of an education. Building the Social Contract. That thing that allows us to all read this sentence. We've agreed on the alphabet and how to arrange those letters into words we agree upon whose meanings hold true for everyone entering into that contract. Those words arranged into a sentence form an idea and several sentences strung together in a paragraph convey an argument for or against or inform the reader of a state, condition or perhaps reveal a things nature. Paint a word picture. Make oneself known.    This contract is not limited to words although they are often explained by words. Things like numbers and their usefulness. Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Music, Art and so on.    The frequency of middle C (C4) is 261.63 Hz is a first principle. We build on that to make music we all can enjoy even if we all can not compose or play. You don't have to master it to make it enjoyable and useful.    So why is the Beginning so difficult? Why is agreement so elusive?   Everyone "Signs" the contract (when receiving that education in obtaining it)  but fewer and fewer in this world have any intention of living by that contract. They find exploiting that contract more advantageous. Disruption. With intent. Without intent. In Ignorance. In your face. With a double dog dare you. With a hold my beer. In resistance to that contract and in spite how it looks on us. It permeates the very air we breath.    In this way the contract is subject to advantage. Abide by it when it serves you, disregard it when it doesn't. Unpredictable and self-serving. Corrosive.....Toxic........   It says a lot about a persons character to disregard the contract, the truth, first principles. None of it good.        ********************************************************   https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/character-vs-personality-who-we-are-and-who-we-aspire-to-be/   Just an interesting article.   
    • It costs $5,250 for the Yukon Nightfall option (black wheels, emblems and illuminated black GMC grill badge). What a "deal". 
    • I keep getting the above error message on my 25 Sierra.  If I reset the infotainment unit (via the phone hang up button) it will work again for a day or 2.   But I dont want to do have to reset  all the time. Works fine in my 2023 Corvette. On both vehicles I connect wirelessly.   I have a Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, phone is up to date.  Any Ideas.  See attached  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...