Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was at the dealership this morning getting a couple recalls taken care of and while I was there I had the parts department look up the blacked out Carbon Pro emblems and exhaust tips since I am thinking about buying them. The part numbers that were listed above did not come up in The dealerships system. This is the part numbers they gave me while looking up a Carbon Pro VIN #. FYI Gm parts direct website has them for a lot cheaper.

image.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, Dbrace said:

I was at the dealership this morning getting a couple recalls taken care of and while I was there I had the parts department look up the blacked out Carbon Pro emblems and exhaust tips since I am thinking about buying them. The part numbers that were listed above did not come up in The dealerships system. This is the part numbers they gave me while looking up a Carbon Pro VIN #. FYI Gm parts direct website has them for a lot cheaper.

 

Those are the same part numbers are they not?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Dick Messerly said:

Yeah I think im going to go illuminated. I'm not positive it will work its not a option in the 2019 accessories page. I know they are the same emblem but talking with my parts manager it may not have the right wiring harness but we just aren't sure until it shows up. I was planning on taking off the front emblem and plastidiping it but we got about a foot of snow and a cold snap down in the teens. I'll probably get it done here in a few days. 

Awesome I saw in your other thread about the emblem someone had it done already. Looks much better without the chrome might pull the trigger on it. If you do end up plasti dipping it I wouldnt mind seeing how it looks on the front also! Got my cans on the way ready to do the rear

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Dbrace said:

I was at the dealership this morning getting a couple recalls taken care of and while I was there I had the parts department look up the blacked out Carbon Pro emblems and exhaust tips since I am thinking about buying them. The part numbers that were listed above did not come up in The dealerships system. This is the part numbers they gave me while looking up a Carbon Pro VIN #. FYI Gm parts direct website has them for a lot cheaper.

image.jpg

Yeah those are the same parts numbers I put in the post earlier. I get employee price on parts which is a few bucks better than what I could find them for online.

Posted

These are the same part #'s that have been provided in this thread...  GM Parts direct stated that the 84690478 is on backorder though...

Posted
4 hours ago, Libertas said:

These are the same part #'s that have been provided in this thread...  GM Parts direct stated that the 84690478 is on backorder though...

I misread the numbers my mistake....The dealership told me they were on back order as well.

Posted (edited)

I ordered these on 2/5/20 - initial ETA was 2/13/20 - now - back ordered - no ETA - so I wait!

 

Going in on 2/21/20 for alignment since level kit and front UCA's went on, a couple to recall's and for fix to my kicker speakers in tailgate - which only work part of the time, add black exhaust tips and to add GM performance air box.

 

I have 2019 AT4 carbon pro - so it came with cat back exhaust, so I wanted to add airbox to maximize airflow with OEM parts.

 

Be nice when it is all done! 

Edited by Supercup
Posted
On 1/30/2020 at 12:49 AM, Dick Messerly said:

Got the new carbon flash black AT4 emblems! They are looking great!!! 

20200128_160340.jpg

20200128_160332.jpg

Hey just wondering are these a matte black or more of a metallic black. My dealership is saying  it has flakes in it. Just want to make sure they ordered the right part. Thanks 

Posted
On 2/21/2020 at 2:44 PM, Gerstein1989 said:

Hey just wondering are these a matte black or more of a metallic black. My dealership is saying  it has flakes in it. Just want to make sure they ordered the right part. Thanks 

They have a flake in them definitely a glossy metallic paint

Posted
59 minutes ago, Dick Messerly said:

They have a flake in them definitely a glossy metallic paint

Thanks. Do you know where you can find the Sierra name plate in black. Can’t find it anywhere. 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Gerstein1989 said:

Thanks. Do you know where you can find the Sierra name plate in black. Can’t find it anywhere. 

I do not think they make it in the carbon flash color. On the carbon pros it's still chrome for some reason I went with the removal option for it. IMO it's too cluttered with it. You could go with the plastidip method on them I did it on the chrome part of my rear gmc emblem. Plastidiping the Sierra part would be super easy though if you went that route. I'll check with my parts department and see if they can find anything. 

Edited by Dick Messerly
Posted
1 minute ago, Dick Messerly said:

I do not think they make it in the carbon flash color. On the carbon pros it's still chrome for some reason I went with the removal option for it. IMO it's too cluttered with it. You could go with the plastidip method on them I did it on the chrome part of my rear gmc emblem. Plastidiping the Sierra part would be super easy though if you went that route. I'll check with my parts department and see if they can find anything. 

Ya I did that but I find the salt and dirt stick to it like crazy. Winder times in Canada lol. Thanks appreciate it. The dealerships near me are always so clueless. 

Posted
On 2/1/2020 at 9:40 PM, Dick Messerly said:

Sorry it took me so long to get back to you all! I'm actually a salesman at a gmc dealership so I've been putting in the hours for end of the month! The 2 part numbers are 84690478 and 84680479 AT4 emblems in carbon flash is what they call them. Plasti dip isn't usually hard, in this case it kinda was. I had to tape all the red off then go in after and exactoknife around it and be super careful on peeling. Just doing the whole emblem back would have been 100 times I'll attach some pics. You probably don't have to leave as big of a space around the emblem but you definitely want some space it peels right off the paint and breaks right on the edges of the emblem. I did 4 coats waiting 30 minutes in between. 

20200129_153753.jpg

Thanks Dick Messerly for the advice, I went ahead and plasti dipped mine and couldn’t be happier! Was really an easy project too.

F5B7986A-31B5-4311-8827-4B051A5EFCB2.jpeg

68746BEC-A46E-462D-A95C-6927C2C47D18.jpeg

269FAF6B-F534-4281-B178-D23434BA75A2.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/4/2020 at 3:03 AM, Libertas said:

Yes.  Gm Parts Direct has it.  I ordered all 3 badges and the 2 exhaust tips.. $297.56 shipped.   I don't have any local dealership connections anymore to get hooked up on employee or trade pricing.

Is there a black exhuast tip? I can’t find it. 

Posted
On 2/25/2020 at 5:37 AM, 2000 said:

Is there a black exhuast tip? I can’t find it. 

84644535

84644536

 

They are separate part #'s for the Left and the Right.  In the parts catalog, they are listed as F Sleeve

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...