Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Anyone know if this will swap over to our 6 speed trucks? I noticed the Camaro SS with the 6L80 comes with a drain plug ,and is said to be larger capacity than the stock Camaro, 

 

ACDelco 24250062 - trans pan for Camaro SS 6L80

 

please correct me if I'm wrong..

 

https://www.gmpartsonline.net/oem-parts/gm-pan-24297104

price is right

Edited by flyingfool
Posted

stumbled across some info,  the camaro pan is part of the fluid level check procedure , its comes with a drain plug but there is also a stand pipe  built into it. since the car has no dip stick. , this still may be a good option for some.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Did anyone ever confirm if this would work for our 6 speed trucks?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Bringing this back up, would be a great option to add a drain plug if this works with the tucks without causing issues.

Posted
On 4/22/2020 at 10:16 AM, MrWeller said:

Did anyone ever confirm if this would work for our 6 speed trucks?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ya we want to know before the secret is out and they cost $250

  • Like 2
Posted

For $25 it might be worth it to just give it a try and see if it fits.

  • Like 1
Posted

I googled that part number from above and on Summit's webpage it says it fits 19 and 20 Silverado's with the 6 speed. No mention of previous years Silverado.

Posted
On 3/3/2020 at 12:26 AM, flyingfool said:

Anyone know if this will swap over to our 6 speed trucks? I noticed the Camaro SS with the 6L80 comes with a drain plug ,and is said to be larger capacity than the stock Camaro, 

 

ACDelco 24250062 - trans pan for Camaro SS 6L80

 

please correct me if I'm wrong..

 

https://www.gmpartsonline.net/oem-parts/gm-pan-24297104

price is right

I mean if we are shopping gen iv powertrain parts, might as well look into anything with a 6l80.

 

vette had em, so did numerous trucks

Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

How much does the Camaro pan hold?

there is a standard pan and the ss pan i think the specs are on GM parts site for capacities.. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Did anyone get one ordered up and try it to see if it fits?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

havent had time to do it yet,  i'm only at 38k miles, i'll pull the pan and order it when i get close to 50k miles

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I ordered part #24297104 from RockAuto for $21.79 so I figured I would check it out. I'll keep you posted when I get to work on it...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

Alright guys, my order from RockAuto showed up this morning. I ordered a new transmission filter, plus the oem transmission pan and acdelco pan #24297104 which fits the Camaro SD and has the factory drain plug.

Upon unboxing them both, they are identical except for the drain plug and the numbers stamped into them. The only thing that makes me wonder about fitting our trucks, is the stand pipe on the inside of the drain plug. It sticks up quite a bit from the bottom of the pan. I'll attach a few pics of the Camaro SS pan so you can see what I'm concerned with. I don't know if this would create any clearance issues or not when installing on our trucks. I haven't done my pan drop yet to see if first hand. 3777ffe33bb426678e781cac5ce5970f.jpg
073e2862fa27404c9d407c15f5d79cc4.jpg
ea31a448be19bff900644f769a2157c0.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm sure if you went to a junkyard where you go in and pull the part off the truck yourself, not a used part place where they do it for you, you can get that part on it's own.  Depending on if and what else you would be buying, and time of day, they might even just skip over adding it as a item to the bill.
    • No, we trade them like pokeman cards.
    • It would be sold as a "kit", lights + auth/programming code.   You can resell the code to someone else, if they just buy the lights, either new or used, and they can then use the code to get them to work on their truck.
    • Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...