Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone else still watch and count how many people wear a mask and gloves in their own personal car still??

 

A couple months into this stuff and I guess they still don't get it lol.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
Does anyone else still watch and count how many people wear a mask and gloves in their own personal car still??
 
A couple months into this stuff and I guess they still don't get it lol.
 
 
 


Seen a motorcyclist for the first time wearing one yesterday. The ironic thing was he was not wearing a helmet [emoji2361]


Ryan B.
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Thejet07 said:


The same people who said the sky was falling. What a joke.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The didn't do the study. Just reported it. 

 

How do you, personally, decide which news is fake and which is real?

Seriously.

I want to know what expert team you've employed to do you fact checks.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


Seen a motorcyclist for the first time wearing one yesterday. The ironic thing was he was not wearing a helmet emoji2361.png


Ryan B.

 

So you see no difference between someone shooting you and you shooting yourself?

 

2 hours ago, Diana Welch said:

Coronavirus is really deadly..

Yes it is 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The didn't do the study. Just reported it. 

 

How do you, personally, decide which news is fake and which is real?

Seriously.

I want to know what expert team you've employed to do you fact checks.


You don’t see they were wayyyy off the first time. Looked like dumbasses, and now say we saved millions to try and save face. Get outta here with your arrogant self. What news do I use you ask? I live in nyc, work for a certain dept that has direct contact with this. I’ve had family who passed from this. I’ve read the statements claiming patients who’ve passed and were positive were marked as covid deaths. Seems pretty simple to me without having to use graphs. I find it funny how now people are out in the streets protesting and rioting and suddenly they’re not selfish aholes. Oh and the chances of asymptomatic transmission is null. So that’s not bad now. And this was mentioned after the rioting started. Check the market.(redistribution of money?)How’s that doing? Who’s on trial right now?
The coronavirus is real. There’s no denying it. It’s not a scary as it’s been made out to 99% of the people who get it. And spare me the what if’s and possibility/probabilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
14 minutes ago, Thejet07 said:


You don’t see they were wayyyy off the first time. Looked like dumbasses, and now say we saved millions to try and save face. Get outta here with your arrogant self. What news do I use you ask? I live in nyc, work for a certain dept that has direct contact with this. I’ve had family who passed from this. I’ve read the statements claiming patients who’ve passed and were positive were marked as covid deaths. Seems pretty simple to me without having to use graphs. I find it funny how now people are out in the streets protesting and rioting and suddenly they’re not selfish aholes. Oh and the chances of asymptomatic transmission is null. So that’s not bad now. And this was mentioned after the rioting started. Check the market.(redistribution of money?)How’s that doing? Who’s on trial right now?
The coronavirus is real. There’s no denying it. It’s not a scary as it’s been made out to 99% of the people who get it. And spare me the what if’s and possibility/probabilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting collection of 'what isn't a fact check'.  Your method is a mud puddle in an ocean. You see no shark in your puddle so sharks are not real and if they are real no one in your puddle got bit so....sharks are not dangerous?

 

What I see was a projection based on zero mitigation cut short by mitigation. You see because it didn't reach unmitigated projections that mitigation was wrong?  

 

I push you away from an arrow headed straight for your heart. The arrow doesn't hit you. You complain I ruffled you shirt and the push was not needed and riot in the streets. Sue for dry cleaning. The arrow didn't hit you. There is a strong reason for you not to hear the 'what ifs'. The truth doesn't help your case. I understand that.  

 

Hey your not in that boat alone. If fact it seems your in the majority. How happy for you all.  

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

The link posted was not a study, it was an unprovable argument and speculation. It draws even more scrutiny when it was done by “experts“ who are benefitted by proving themselves correct, even after being 100% wrong in the past.


I based my opinions on what actually happens. Not on estimates. Not on what I thought was going to happen. 

 

What has actually happened?

 

States that opened earlier saw no uptick in cases (experts said they would). States like mine that opened later also saw no uptick (experts said they would). Countries that never closed down in the first place followed the same basic line as those that did. Cities with the most draconian lockdowns still saw the highest infection rates. And more than 10 days after the riots, the rioters are not dropping dead.

 

That is strong evidence that the lockdowns were at best ineffective and at worst, counterproductive and harmful.

 

Even disregarding all that...in a sane world, the mask argument AND the lockdown argument would have been put to bed when the CDC and WHO respectively said surface to surface transmission is very difficult and asymptomatic spread is very rare.
 

I do give some benefit of the doubt to our early reactions to what was a novel virus. But as of now, there is no excuse to carry on treating this thing like we did 3 months ago. Unfortunately certain people are far too invested in the original narrative to see things as they are.

  • Like 1
Posted
Interesting collection of 'what isn't a fact check'.  Your method is a mud puddle in an ocean. You see no shark in your puddle so sharks are not real and if they are real no one in your puddle got bit so....sharks are not dangerous?
 
What I see was a projection based on zero mitigation cut short by mitigation. You see because it didn't reach unmitigated projections that mitigation was wrong?  
 
I push you away from an arrow headed straight for your heart. The arrow doesn't hit you. You complain I ruffled you shirt and the push was not needed and riot in the streets. Sue for dry cleaning. The arrow didn't hit you. There is a strong reason for you not to hear the 'what ifs'. The truth doesn't help your case. I understand that.  
 
Hey your not in that boat alone. If fact it seems your in the majority. How happy for you all.  

Try hard. It’ll be ok


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 hours ago, Thejet07 said:


Try hard. It’ll be ok


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 This isn't a war. I don't need to win it.  I ask questions. Post information. Watch the response. Enjoy my coffee.

 

If a person is in a burning building and scared for their life then by all means, try to save them

If they've pour gas on themselves and light it...

Stand back or they will take you with them

 

You sir have a cause and are on a mission.

I don't care what that mission is

Your just a curiosity

No need to "try"

There is no prize

Got my answer

:crazy:

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Um, Mr. Grumpy, this is your boss at MSNBC. Didnt you get the memo? Were not doing Covid-19 any more; we got the BLM riot scare tactic to push now. Please switch to alarmist narrative C...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

The link posted was not a study, it was an unprovable argument and speculation. It draws even more scrutiny when it was done by “experts“ who are benefitted by proving themselves correct, even after being 100% wrong in the past.


I based my opinions on what actually happens. Not on estimates. Not on what I thought was going to happen. 

 

What has actually happened?

 

States that opened earlier saw no uptick in cases (experts said they would). States like mine that opened later also saw no uptick (experts said they would). Countries that never closed down in the first place followed the same basic line as those that did. Cities with the most draconian lockdowns still saw the highest infection rates. And more than 10 days after the riots, the rioters are not dropping dead.

 

That is strong evidence that the lockdowns were at best ineffective and at worst, counterproductive and harmful.

 

Even disregarding all that...in a sane world, the mask argument AND the lockdown argument would have been put to bed when the CDC and WHO respectively said surface to surface transmission is very difficult and asymptomatic spread is very rare.
 

I do give some benefit of the doubt to our early reactions to what was a novel virus. But as of now, there is no excuse to carry on treating this thing like we did 3 months ago. Unfortunately certain people are far too invested in the original narrative to see things as they are.

I'd still rather wear a mask or social distance because I don't trust selfish assholes to stay home when they're sick. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Texas Daddy said:

Um, Mr. Grumpy, this is your boss at MSNBC. Didnt you get the memo? Were not doing Covid-19 any more; we got the BLM riot scare tactic to push now. Please switch to alarmist narrative C...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

When your in a room with a tiger fear is just good common sense. 

 

What's the last thing you hear a redneck say?

Hold my beer. Watch this!!

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,925
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    btm
    Newest Member
    btm
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,397 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can ask that about a lot of places.   Holiday sells 91 for $1 over 87 octane. BP 93 is 80 cents. Amoco 93 is 80 cents Kwik Trips is $1.20 for 92 or whatever they have and $1 for the 91.   I know that this is not exactly same as what you are saying with the premium to premium debate of those two stations but why is there such a difference. Top Tier this and that, it's all BS. All the fuel comes from the same damn refinery, so give me a break.
    • Why does Mobil Premium cost 90 cents a gallon more than Shell Premium when their regular offerings are but pennies apart? 
    • Was all the way down to $3.69 a gallon but then jumped back to $3.99 just because for some reason.   Diesel floats between $4.80's to $5.10ish a gallon. I even saw Diesel #1 for $6.09 today but nobody in there right mind even buys that in the summer.
    • Mine just keeps lagging or getting stuck on the reverse camera. When I turn off the truck, get out, and close the door it will still stay on. It’s very intermittent and I would not be able to duplicate the issue. 
    • I was checking out fuel prices at my farm fuel retailer at their pumps and yes the farm price is a bit lower than the non dyed fuel and was glad to see that the regular farm gas price has dropped a lot from what it had been but what blew me away was the price of diesel as the spread now compared to before the prices went up earlier in the year, diesel was actually slightly lower than gas which was a switch from the theme the last number of years. However that sure isn't the theme lately and definitely not right now. The prices I will post are not from that retailer but just looking at gasbuddy for the main city in this area and instead of posting the lowest price someone found I will list the higher price ( and that may not be the highest price, just whatever someone posted on gasbuddy ).   So regular gas and there are a lot of stations listing the same price for regular is 1.68 a liter, premium 2.00 a liter. Diesel 2.03 a liter for a top price I saw on diesel.   Figures out to 6.36 a us gallon Canadian funds for regular and 7.68 for diesel. With the US exchange rate it would be 4.58 us for regular and 5.53 for diesel.    Thought I would figure that out to get a picture of what it settles out like compared to various US prices and its about the same as the current price in Fairbanks AK as Anchorage tends to be lower. So yes, these would be the prices and higher along the way on the Alaska highway where they know they have a captured market !, for fuel prices for those beginning the long drive back to the lower 48   The problem is our Canadian dollar and going to the states that have the high prices, boy do we pay then !
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...