Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone else still watch and count how many people wear a mask and gloves in their own personal car still??

 

A couple months into this stuff and I guess they still don't get it lol.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
Does anyone else still watch and count how many people wear a mask and gloves in their own personal car still??
 
A couple months into this stuff and I guess they still don't get it lol.
 
 
 


Seen a motorcyclist for the first time wearing one yesterday. The ironic thing was he was not wearing a helmet [emoji2361]


Ryan B.
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Thejet07 said:


The same people who said the sky was falling. What a joke.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The didn't do the study. Just reported it. 

 

How do you, personally, decide which news is fake and which is real?

Seriously.

I want to know what expert team you've employed to do you fact checks.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


Seen a motorcyclist for the first time wearing one yesterday. The ironic thing was he was not wearing a helmet emoji2361.png


Ryan B.

 

So you see no difference between someone shooting you and you shooting yourself?

 

2 hours ago, Diana Welch said:

Coronavirus is really deadly..

Yes it is 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The didn't do the study. Just reported it. 

 

How do you, personally, decide which news is fake and which is real?

Seriously.

I want to know what expert team you've employed to do you fact checks.


You don’t see they were wayyyy off the first time. Looked like dumbasses, and now say we saved millions to try and save face. Get outta here with your arrogant self. What news do I use you ask? I live in nyc, work for a certain dept that has direct contact with this. I’ve had family who passed from this. I’ve read the statements claiming patients who’ve passed and were positive were marked as covid deaths. Seems pretty simple to me without having to use graphs. I find it funny how now people are out in the streets protesting and rioting and suddenly they’re not selfish aholes. Oh and the chances of asymptomatic transmission is null. So that’s not bad now. And this was mentioned after the rioting started. Check the market.(redistribution of money?)How’s that doing? Who’s on trial right now?
The coronavirus is real. There’s no denying it. It’s not a scary as it’s been made out to 99% of the people who get it. And spare me the what if’s and possibility/probabilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
14 minutes ago, Thejet07 said:


You don’t see they were wayyyy off the first time. Looked like dumbasses, and now say we saved millions to try and save face. Get outta here with your arrogant self. What news do I use you ask? I live in nyc, work for a certain dept that has direct contact with this. I’ve had family who passed from this. I’ve read the statements claiming patients who’ve passed and were positive were marked as covid deaths. Seems pretty simple to me without having to use graphs. I find it funny how now people are out in the streets protesting and rioting and suddenly they’re not selfish aholes. Oh and the chances of asymptomatic transmission is null. So that’s not bad now. And this was mentioned after the rioting started. Check the market.(redistribution of money?)How’s that doing? Who’s on trial right now?
The coronavirus is real. There’s no denying it. It’s not a scary as it’s been made out to 99% of the people who get it. And spare me the what if’s and possibility/probabilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting collection of 'what isn't a fact check'.  Your method is a mud puddle in an ocean. You see no shark in your puddle so sharks are not real and if they are real no one in your puddle got bit so....sharks are not dangerous?

 

What I see was a projection based on zero mitigation cut short by mitigation. You see because it didn't reach unmitigated projections that mitigation was wrong?  

 

I push you away from an arrow headed straight for your heart. The arrow doesn't hit you. You complain I ruffled you shirt and the push was not needed and riot in the streets. Sue for dry cleaning. The arrow didn't hit you. There is a strong reason for you not to hear the 'what ifs'. The truth doesn't help your case. I understand that.  

 

Hey your not in that boat alone. If fact it seems your in the majority. How happy for you all.  

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

The link posted was not a study, it was an unprovable argument and speculation. It draws even more scrutiny when it was done by “experts“ who are benefitted by proving themselves correct, even after being 100% wrong in the past.


I based my opinions on what actually happens. Not on estimates. Not on what I thought was going to happen. 

 

What has actually happened?

 

States that opened earlier saw no uptick in cases (experts said they would). States like mine that opened later also saw no uptick (experts said they would). Countries that never closed down in the first place followed the same basic line as those that did. Cities with the most draconian lockdowns still saw the highest infection rates. And more than 10 days after the riots, the rioters are not dropping dead.

 

That is strong evidence that the lockdowns were at best ineffective and at worst, counterproductive and harmful.

 

Even disregarding all that...in a sane world, the mask argument AND the lockdown argument would have been put to bed when the CDC and WHO respectively said surface to surface transmission is very difficult and asymptomatic spread is very rare.
 

I do give some benefit of the doubt to our early reactions to what was a novel virus. But as of now, there is no excuse to carry on treating this thing like we did 3 months ago. Unfortunately certain people are far too invested in the original narrative to see things as they are.

  • Like 1
Posted
Interesting collection of 'what isn't a fact check'.  Your method is a mud puddle in an ocean. You see no shark in your puddle so sharks are not real and if they are real no one in your puddle got bit so....sharks are not dangerous?
 
What I see was a projection based on zero mitigation cut short by mitigation. You see because it didn't reach unmitigated projections that mitigation was wrong?  
 
I push you away from an arrow headed straight for your heart. The arrow doesn't hit you. You complain I ruffled you shirt and the push was not needed and riot in the streets. Sue for dry cleaning. The arrow didn't hit you. There is a strong reason for you not to hear the 'what ifs'. The truth doesn't help your case. I understand that.  
 
Hey your not in that boat alone. If fact it seems your in the majority. How happy for you all.  

Try hard. It’ll be ok


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 hours ago, Thejet07 said:


Try hard. It’ll be ok


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 This isn't a war. I don't need to win it.  I ask questions. Post information. Watch the response. Enjoy my coffee.

 

If a person is in a burning building and scared for their life then by all means, try to save them

If they've pour gas on themselves and light it...

Stand back or they will take you with them

 

You sir have a cause and are on a mission.

I don't care what that mission is

Your just a curiosity

No need to "try"

There is no prize

Got my answer

:crazy:

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Um, Mr. Grumpy, this is your boss at MSNBC. Didnt you get the memo? Were not doing Covid-19 any more; we got the BLM riot scare tactic to push now. Please switch to alarmist narrative C...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

The link posted was not a study, it was an unprovable argument and speculation. It draws even more scrutiny when it was done by “experts“ who are benefitted by proving themselves correct, even after being 100% wrong in the past.


I based my opinions on what actually happens. Not on estimates. Not on what I thought was going to happen. 

 

What has actually happened?

 

States that opened earlier saw no uptick in cases (experts said they would). States like mine that opened later also saw no uptick (experts said they would). Countries that never closed down in the first place followed the same basic line as those that did. Cities with the most draconian lockdowns still saw the highest infection rates. And more than 10 days after the riots, the rioters are not dropping dead.

 

That is strong evidence that the lockdowns were at best ineffective and at worst, counterproductive and harmful.

 

Even disregarding all that...in a sane world, the mask argument AND the lockdown argument would have been put to bed when the CDC and WHO respectively said surface to surface transmission is very difficult and asymptomatic spread is very rare.
 

I do give some benefit of the doubt to our early reactions to what was a novel virus. But as of now, there is no excuse to carry on treating this thing like we did 3 months ago. Unfortunately certain people are far too invested in the original narrative to see things as they are.

I'd still rather wear a mask or social distance because I don't trust selfish assholes to stay home when they're sick. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Texas Daddy said:

Um, Mr. Grumpy, this is your boss at MSNBC. Didnt you get the memo? Were not doing Covid-19 any more; we got the BLM riot scare tactic to push now. Please switch to alarmist narrative C...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

When your in a room with a tiger fear is just good common sense. 

 

What's the last thing you hear a redneck say?

Hold my beer. Watch this!!

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...