Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, The Zip said:

Although I still look at them, I'm desensitized with individual graphs and statistics.  The back and forth distorted my view.  The only info that interest me today is if for some inadvertent reason FOX, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc, link satellites and transmit the same news at the same time.  For example, cases are increasing.  Then, that's probably believable.   

It is expected that the cases are increasing.  Mainly because in the last few weeks we went from testing 100,000 people in America per day to 600,000 thousand people in America per day.  We are more quickly gaining a picture of how widespread this already was.

  • Like 1
Posted

I heard an interesting stat this morning. It’s general knowledge the deaths are degreasing as time passes. Interesting though the state with the most deaths are states that are still shut down. Texas and Florida are among the lowest. Texas is under 100 per million. The younger less at risk people may be increasing herd immunity while the older population is protecting themselves.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Almost everything I read seems to preface every statement with "due to inaccurate or due to gaps in reporting or...." and then continues to argue their case, whatever their case may be on the very thing they admit or have reason to believe is inaccurate. 

 

My eye witness didn't actually see this guy kill this other fella but base on this eye witness testimony he did it. 

Or didn't do it depending on which turn is expected.

 

This whole thing is like a murder trial without a body. 

 

It seems unlikely to me that a society that can track down a mad cow to the the very stall in was born in anywhere in the

world  is unable to decide the cause of death of a COVID-19 patient. 

 

I heard in a pod cast this or that. This is now proof of anything? I heard it in a pod cast? 

 

Better! Claiming the CDC numbers are wrong......until those numbers support an argument then there good to go.

 

My favorite is the best minds in the world haven't got a handle on this but a few guys in a forum do.

 

Are we missing the obvious? If the best minds have no agreement then there isn't any actual knowledge.

No one has anything 'figured out'

 

All this is just noise

 

:rant: 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Almost everything I read seems to preface every statement with "due to inaccurate or due to gaps in reporting or...." and then continues to argue their case, whatever their case may be on the very thing they admit or have reason to believe is inaccurate. 

 

 

22 hours ago, The Zip said:

There's really nothing else I need to read or hear. 

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Are we missing the obvious? If the best minds have no agreement then there isn't any actual knowledge.

No one has anything 'figured out'

Although new in it's execution, this is still a virus and it's probably safe to say a person will get it through smell or touch.  Contrary to your message, everyone has it figured it out.  Mask, distance, and hand washing.

 

Basic concept for a virus as told to me from someone born in the 1930s.  Wasn't a whole lot of medicine back then; castor oil, goody's powder, chicken noodle soup, wash your hands, cover your mouth, stay in your room, and get plenty of rest.  I was back playing street football in short order.

Posted

I visit older than me outside. My grandkids visit me outside. I still go out to eat. Face cover, hand sanitizer, check. Precautions taken. The younger less patient take more chances and are less likely to die. I look at them as warriors for herd immunity. I don’t go around them. I don’t go where they go naturally anytime. Bug or not. Like a cold I figure more likely than not I’ll get it. There’re many things out there that can kill me. I don’t sit around and shake in fear about it. I take precautions. Hopefully if or when they’ll be mitigated medications for it. A cure? I doubt it. Mutations will probably take care of that. The malaria drug is front and center as a mitigator if taken early, imagine that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, The Zip said:

Although new in it's execution, this is still a virus and it's probably safe to say a person will get it through smell or touch.  Contrary to your message, everyone has it figured it out.  Mask, distance, and hand washing.

 

Basic concept for a virus as told to me from someone born in the 1930s.  Wasn't a whole lot of medicine back then; castor oil, goody's powder, chicken noodle soup, wash your hands, cover your mouth, stay in your room, and get plenty of rest.  I was back playing street football in short order.

Not what I meant.

fa get'a bout it 

Posted
On 7/7/2020 at 12:08 PM, KARNUT said:

The malaria drug is front and center as a mitigator if taken early, imagine that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's been disproven.

  • Like 2
Posted

The studies were bs and thrown out stating it was ineffective. Now they’re saying hydrochloroquin helps last I read.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

I’ve asked my doctor if I get the bug can I take the drug. He reply was yes. It’s nice to live in a state that political bias doesn’t effect medical care.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

HCQ in conjunction with zinc is what kills the virus.  Hydroxychloroquine opens up the cell and allows the zinc to enter which does the killing.  Put it another way, HCQ is the gun and zinc is the bullet.

 

HCQ by itself does little or nothing.  HCQ with Azithromycin (Z-Pack) or Doxycycline does little or nothing.  You gotta have the zinc.

 

And high dosages are not required either.  Standard zinc pills that you buy at Walmart is all that's needed.  Standard Z-Pack and those 200 milligram pills of Plaquenil that that cost about  a dime each.  The entire 5-day regimine costs less than $20.

 

The VA Study and others basically killed their patients by administering lethal doses in their studies with no background as to why the dosages needed to be so high.  Don't hold your breath on criminal charges against those cretins.

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I’ve asked my doctor if I get the bug can I take the drug. He reply was yes. It’s nice to live in a state that political bias doesn’t effect medical care.
 

I generally find family doctors to be apolitical with matters pertaining to my health.  I also find they are generally willing to write a prescription upon request for a specific drug if I feel one is needed.  As long as he/she sees no harm, such as conflicts with other medication, my requests are supported. (As an aside, I ask these questions in an effort to minimize the use of drugs.  I will not take a drug that is unproven or I suspect is prescribed on the basis of it "won't hurt.")  I believe the "malaria drug" was/is highly politicized and you know I try to avoid the political banter. However, I am curious as to what your doctor said about the actual efficacy of this drug in treating this particular virus.

  • Like 1
Posted
I generally find family doctors to be apolitical with matters pertaining to my health.  I also find they are generally willing to write a prescription upon request for a specific drug if I feel one is needed.  As long as he/she sees no harm, such as conflicts with other medication, my requests are supported. (As an aside, I ask these questions in an effort to minimize the use of drugs.  I will not take a drug that is unproven or I suspect is prescribed on the basis of it "won't hurt.")  I believe the "malaria drug" was/is highly politicized and you know I try to avoid the political banter. However, I am curious as to what your doctor said about the actual efficacy of this drug in treating this particular virus.

I take zinc every day. I’ve taken the malaria drug when going over seas. I suspect lots of doctors take the combo as a preventative. Some have said as much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,881
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    tararebecca
    Newest Member
    tararebecca
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 669 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree, simplicity and reliability matter more as vehicles get more complicated. A V8 work truck option with fewer electronic features and a stronger warranty would definitely appeal to a lot of buyers who use their trucks for real work. Customizing it with trusted outfitters is often the best way to get exactly what you need.webcrimsNY
    • I’ve heard similar complaints from newer vehicles where the factory “premium” systems don’t always live up to expectations. A good installer should be able to improve the sound without turning it into a bass-heavy setup. I’d look into upgrading the front speakers, adding a quality DSP amplifier, and possibly improving sound deadening first—those changes usually make a much bigger difference than just adding a subwoofer. Hopefully someone local can recommend a reputable installer in the Las Vegas/St. George area.
    • Do you remember that Harley Davidson was more successful (solvent) when it produced about 60% of the market demand (by design) and forced wait times of up to three years? Even when your turn came around it was, "Take what we are giving you or move to the back of the line and start over". HUGE markup's were 'normalized' and dealer killed. 40% markup and no floor plan? What's not to love? Greed will kill them yet. They have surplus production and customer base is tanking. And still they think nosebleed pricing will work.  
    • The engine was done as part of the 6.2 recall?   You'd have to see if your VIN also has the 6.2 engine special coverage on it.  Coverage number is N252494003.  If you have this, your engine is covered under this and NOT the GM replacement part engine warranty which is 3yr/100k from the date of install.  The 3yr/100k mi warranty is in effect for non warranty purchases.     This is not any different if it was replaced under warranty without a recall or special coverage.  So if you had a 5.3 and it popped at 3 years in at 50,000mi during the 5yr/60k powertrain, the replacement engine would not get the 3yr/100k, and instead gets the remainder of the 5yr/60k as coverage.     So N252494003 gives 10 years or 150,000mi of coverage, which ever comes first, starting at the vehicle in service date.  So if your in service date is 01/01/2022, N252494003 gives you special coverage of the engine until 01/01/2032 or 150,000mi, whichever comes first.  So if your start date was 01/01/2022, you'd have left 5 years and 4 months (lets round to august 1st), or 62,000mi left of coverage.   So you need to know your in service date to know how much coverage is left.  
    • Okiee dokie there bud, way to take things to the extreme.   I guess you missed the whole point and take things way to serious. I installed different EV6 style injectors that just so happen to be larger in my car running the same LQ4 engine and with a better spray pattern than the stock style injectors and I noticed no difference in the idle quality. Kinda was my round about way of saying that even if you put the same size but better style injectors in your truck, you will likely see the same thing.    I'm sure you're great to have conversations with in person if that's how you act through a keyboard. One little things sets you off and now I guess my dick is all up in your face.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...