Jump to content

SOLD FS: '20 Off-Road assist steps- take offs from new AT4


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone, I hope this listing finds you and your family safe and healthy. 

 

For sale is my OEM Off-Road assist steps, dealer installed.  Part# 84742421.  I have no need for them, and frankly have never been a fan of running boards.  For local pickup only, or I may drive a little way to meet if reasonable.  They are still on my truck, and can easily be removed.  Note, my truck is parked and not being driven and has less than 900 miles as my truck is only a month old, and I drive my work truck most of the time.   So, they are like new.  Retail is $995.00.  Will sell for $550 O.B.O.   Central NY, zip 13480...an hour east of Syracuse. 

Paul

gmc7.jpg

gmc3.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
2 hours ago, snork said:

Do these have the Sierra naming on them and are these for crew cab or double cab?

Yes, they have the Sierra name on them and my truck is a crew cab.  I am not sure if they would work for a double cab, but it may be the same part number.  

Posted
3 hours ago, Ithan Henry said:

Damn that's a really good price.  Wish I had seen these before I bought mine.

Agreed. Tennessee is a long way from NY though......................

Posted
On 5/4/2020 at 3:10 PM, sweatandsteel said:

Agreed. Tennessee is a long way from NY though......................

I would ship, but man these things are big and heavy.  I can't begin to imagine what the shipping costs would be.  For what it's worth, I love Tennessee...beautiful state.  

Hopfully somebody within a reasonable distance chimes in soon.  It is a great deal.

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, paulny said:

I would ship, but man these things are big and heavy.  I can't being to imagine what the shipping costs would be.  For what it's worth, I love Tennessee...beautiful state.  

Hopfully somebody within a reasonable distance chimes in soon.  It is a great deal.

 

I understand but just let me know if you decide to social distance by taking a long drive to Tennessee! 

Posted
3 hours ago, Delmster said:

If you would happen to look into shipping(lol) I may be interested in them.  But I'm in WV. so shipping would be a killer also 

I am from Lewisburg WV originally, so hope all is well back in my home state.   I can certainly look into shipping, but am confident it will be fairly high.

 

I am not that far from Pennsylvania, so I would consider a meet and greet if you're willing to drive some.  I can be in Scranton PA in an hour, but even from Morgantown (if you live close to there), it's still 5 hours drive.  

Posted

How about Texas, it's closer?? ha.  I would love those and $300 is a steal but not sure how much shipping would be?  zip is 75771

Posted

Can I ask why you are looking at selling the steps? Just don't like having steps on your truck, or looking for a different set? I have a 2019 AT4 with the round bar steps, but saw these in person and really like the look. I'm located in WNY, and would be willing to trade if you were interested.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...