Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2020 GMC Sierra with a 6.2L. It has a total of 5900 km or 3670 miles. About 950 miles ago noticed that the idle was getting rough and when I would use the remote start in the morning after it sat overnight it puffed blue smoke out of the exhaust.  It disappeared after about 10 seconds.  Turns out that at lease 1 valve guide was not sealing properly. The dealer is changing all the seals on both heads and I am going to ask that the spark plug(s) also be changed since I believe they are dirtyIMG_4056.thumb.JPG.da0271df33778f1dc5dce0353360764c.JPG from the burning oil. Has anyone experienced this?

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I have a 2020 GMC Sierra 1500 AT4 with the 6.2L. I have noticed while driving the truck that it blow blueish gray smoke out the back while leaving from a stop sign. Sometimes it is very large some times you can barley see it. Doesnt happen all the time. I changed my oil and after 2000 miles the low oil level light came on I was down 3 quarts of oil. I immediatly made and appt with the dealer. They told me I needed to do an oil consumtion test. So I did that. In 1000 miles I was down 1 1/4- 1 1/2 quarts of oil. They told me to bring it back in 500-1000 miles again. That was unexceptable to me. So after a few phone calls the dealer took the truck in to look at it. They had to call the GM engineers and talk with them they found that cylinder 7 had bad valve seals and valve guide. They replaced the entire cyclinder head. I picked it up on friday after them having it a week. I drove the 11 miles home. On saturday I drove 70 miles and sunday night on my way to work 23 miles it blew a big puff of smoke again. So monday morning I took It back to the dealer and told them it wasnt fixed. They look at it and on tuesday they said they vouldnt find any issues with the truck and for me to pick the truck up. So I reluctantly did. Called GM help line. I already had a case because thats the only way the dealer would look at my truck and explained the situation. The escaladed it up to their SR advisors. So I waited 2 days to hear from them just to repeat myself of everything that was said in the first 2 conversations. They tell me they have to reach out to the service manager and will call me back on monday. So yesterday they call me back just to tell me that they havent been able to get in touch with thwm and they would call me back on weds. So meanwhile I am driving a brand new expensive truck that smokes when it wants to and burns oil. The dealer has already told me its normal and wanted me to except that for an answer. So far not good customer service from dealer or GM. I guess a smoking burning oil issue isnt a safty concern. I have taken videos of it happening because the dealer cant replicate the problem and says it doesnt exsist. Showed the video to them and they say a cloud of smoke is normal. 

Posted

mexican engine or usa ?

Posted

The engine assembly location is on your truck's new window sticker. My 5.3 engine and transmission was made in Tonawanda new York. 

Posted

I didn't know GM had an engine plant in Mexico. My 2020 GMC Sierra was assembled in Mexico, but the 5.3L was made in Flint.

Posted

Hooley17, I can understand your frustration. My brother in law in Fort Worth has a 2019 AT4 with the 6.2L. Drives the hell

out of it on his ranch & in the city. I will ask him today if he has had issues. 

Posted

I know GM has great engineers & their engines are thoroughly tested. I wonder if 0W-20 oil has anything to do with it?

 

Ford still uses 5W-30 & I wish GM could hit their mileage numbers with that grade of oil as well 

Posted
1 hour ago, Jay Curlin said:

I know GM has great engineers & their engines are thoroughly tested. I wonder if 0W-20 oil has anything to do with it?

 

Ford still uses 5W-30 & I wish GM could hit their mileage numbers with that grade of oil as well 

Ford calls for 5W-20 on the F150 V8 and has for many many years.  The number before the W (stands for Winter) is the cold viscosity rating for the oil.  Both 0W-20 and 5W-20 are 20 wt oils at normal operating temps (210°F). The viscosity has nothing to do with using oil, that's mechanical condition with parts that are on the high end of the tolerance limits.  

 

0W-20 engine oil can reduce the startup load by making it easier to turn over a cold engine and the impact is felt at higher temperatures than most consumers would think,  not simply to what feels cold to humans - warm summers days are cold to an parked engine.  Also these newer engines with Variable Valve Timing and Active Fuel Management operate at peak efficiency with the oem recommended viscosity. 

Posted

My 2017 Expedition with 3.5L Ecoboost V6 twin turbo used 5W-30. That is Ford's most popular engine. If they have moved it

to 5W-20 I stand corrected. Yes, I would never suggest using another grade of oil than recommended by the manufacturer. I'm

simply amazed at the liquidity of these oils today. GM is even running 0W-20 in their new baby Duramax......and with an aluminum

block. Real interested to see how those do at 150,000 miles plus. Reviews are fantastic on that motor

Posted
1 hour ago, Jay Curlin said:

My 2017 Expedition with 3.5L Ecoboost V6 twin turbo used 5W-30. That is Ford's most popular engine. If they have moved it

to 5W-20 I stand corrected. Yes, I would never suggest using another grade of oil than recommended by the manufacturer. I'm

simply amazed at the liquidity of these oils today. GM is even running 0W-20 in their new baby Duramax......and with an aluminum

block. Real interested to see how those do at 150,000 miles plus. Reviews are fantastic on that motor

Your are comparing GM V8 engines to Ford's hair dryer V6.  GM calls for 5W-30 in the V6 as well. 

Ford V8 calls for 5W-20 since 2002.

 

 

ENGINE—ENGINE OIL—RECOMMENDED Article No.
APPLICATIONS FOR SAE 5W-20 AND SAE 5W-30 02-1-9
MOTOR OILS—GASOLINE AND FLEXIBLE FUEL
VEHICLES ONLY

 

Testing has validated this viscosity grade can be
used in many previous model year vehicles. It is
recommended ALL vehicles on the following Vehicle
Application Listing be service with SAE 5W-20.
All 2001-2002 vehicles other than those listed in the
“Exception 2001 Vehicles” or “Exception 2002
Vehicles” chart are being filled with SAE 5W-20
motor oil at the factory and should also be serviced
with SAE 5W-20 oil.
 

Posted
My 2017 Expedition with 3.5L Ecoboost V6 twin turbo used 5W-30. That is Ford's most popular engine. If they have moved it
to 5W-20 I stand corrected. Yes, I would never suggest using another grade of oil than recommended by the manufacturer. I'm
simply amazed at the liquidity of these oils today. GM is even running 0W-20 in their new baby Duramax......and with an aluminum
block. Real interested to see how those do at 150,000 miles plus. Reviews are fantastic on that motor


Camaros run 0W-40 now


Ryan B.
Posted


Camaros run 0W-40 now


Ryan B.
Which Camaros? Iirc, there's 4 different engines in that car. Also, there are differences between LT1 and L87, even if the architecture is the same or similar.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...