Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/15/2021 at 10:38 AM, lildann said:

I just got a new truck and got this cover from the dealer. I love the way it looks and how functional it is but I’m also having leak issues. It’s almost like the cover is a few inches too short. The rubber lip by the cab barely covers the foam seal when the rear tailgate seal fits like it says in the manual. (Two fingers of the seal touching the tailgate.) I went back to the dealer to verify that I got the correct cover and they said it is correct. I adjusted it closer to the cab yesterday trying to at least stop the water from covering the inside of the whole bed. Haven’t had a chance to test it yet. But now it barely touches the tailgate. It will probably leak there now. 

28585739-8F5D-4575-9397-866607333792.jpeg

I just installed this on my ZR2 and like you mentioned, it seems to be too short for the current body style.  I bet this part has been around quite a while which may have fit the pre-2019 trucks perfectly.  However, it seems the new body style beds may be slightly longer, or the dimensions changed just enough to render this cover not as snug as previous models.  I have tried to readjust many times, and when I have it snug against the cab, then the tailgate doesn't meet the rubber seal when closed and has probably a 1/4" gap or more not sealed thus allowing a lot of water in through the tailgate area.  Then, when I adjust the cover back toward the tailgate slightly to help with that gap, I now have a significant gap near the cab.  I think REV (a.k.a Bakflip) did not modify this cover at all for the new style trucks and are simply saying this part# fits the current 2019 and newer trucks to save money.   I don't expect water tight, but I am getting too much water during a rain to justify keeping this $1k cover.  I am taking mine back to the dealer for a full refund and going back to the drawing board.

  • Sad 1
Posted

So the first bit of rain came in today since I installed it. Holy hell this thing let's in significant amounts of water. Not only does it let in water on the four corners but I've already noticed drips where the cover joints are. I'm going to return this and get something else.

  • Sad 1
Posted

I have had the REV accessory cover on since I bought the Denali new.  Although I had to go back they next day to make them install it better, there was a 1/8" gap at the top of the t-gate and snow had entered on the drive home some 10 miles.  As I told the SM, obviously installed by someone who did not care or know what they was doing.    To date very little water leaks in after the SM himself to charge of installing it.  All to often dealers delegate this kind of work to to detail shop and all too often some of those guys can't walk and chew gum at the same time.

 

There is no way to make it a perfect water tight seal and anyone expecting that is being unreasonable IMO.  It was never designed to be that.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, elcamino said:

I have had the REV accessory cover on since I bought the Denali new.  Although I had to go back they next day to make them install it better, there was a 1/8" gap at the top of the t-gate and snow had entered on the drive home some 10 miles.  As I told the SM, obviously installed by someone who did not care or know what they was doing.    To date very little water leaks in after the SM himself to charge of installing it.  All to often dealers delegate this kind of work to to detail shop and all too often some of those guys can't walk and chew gum at the same time.

 

There is no way to make it a perfect water tight seal and anyone expecting that is being unreasonable IMO.  It was never designed to be that.

 

I don't think expecting a water resistant seal from a 1200 dollar tonneau cover is unreasonable? I have had complete water tight seals in many trucks with 300 dollar tonneau covers. For 1200 bucks, I expect it not to let in a gallon of water during a light 30 minute rain event. 

To me there are obvious engineering pitfalls in this cover and I think someone had it right in a previous post where they didn't make any adjustments from the K body trucks. At minimum the tonneau cover is one inch short, two would be appropriate in actually. And the seal design at the corners is questionable. 

Edited by jaxcam02
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, jaxcam02 said:

 

I don't think expecting a water resistant seal from a 1200 dollar tonneau cover is unreasonable? I have had complete water tight seals in many trucks with 300 dollar tonneau covers. For 1200 bucks, I expect it not to let in a gallon of water during a light 30 minute rain event. 

To me there are obvious engineering pitfalls in this cover and I think someone had it right in a previous post where they didn't make any adjustments from the K body trucks. At minimum the tonneau cover is one inch, two would be appropriate in actually. And the seal design at the corners is questionable. 


I bought a Revolver x4s and Installed it myself and it only leaks at the tailgate, however, its not much. I made it loose at the tailgate end so that the tailgate would still drop when I hit the release button. Either way, I am happy with it!

Posted

Instead of returning the tonneau cover I decided to motigate the leaking with some automotive foam tape I had on my garage. We shall see how this works.

 

20220602_214923.thumb.jpg.0e229e1229c48faf9ae5d24bf09c0777.jpg

 

20220602_215539.thumb.jpg.422086b6854602cbdec3f9839d66a1c3.jpg

Posted

I have never owned a Tonneau cover but am interested in getting one now.  It sounds like leaks and tailgate functionality are 2 concerns.  What is the best tonneau cover for a 2022 Trail Boss refresh? I don't want to spend over $500. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Street Queen said:

I have never owned a Tonneau cover but am interested in getting one now.  It sounds like leaks and tailgate functionality are 2 concerns.  What is the best tonneau cover for a 2022 Trail Boss refresh? I don't want to spend over $500. 

The soft extang trifecta 2.0 trifold is right up your alley. Since it covers up more surface area of the bedrails, tailgate. All it'll need is a 10 dollar strip of weatherstripping at the front part of the bed to complete the seal. I had one on my 17 silverado and I loved it. The soft ones can just be opened with a razor blade so they aren't as secure as the hard ones but it did the job.20180608_150536.thumb.jpg.eda42d476df34093fc56a061c5d2fe41.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Had our second small rain event today and this thing still leaks at the front corners. It also appears like the front seal allows water through seal channel in which it sits in along the entire width of the seal. Also looks like the drain assembly is no fully sealed with the side rails. It leaks at the joint.20220606_150224.thumb.jpg.33964e153b3a28a282aca405b60a2cd7.jpg

Posted
On 6/5/2022 at 11:11 AM, ckwilson73 said:

I have a hard folding cover from Rough Country. It leaks very little, and was considerably cheaper than the bak flip. I used this cover on a 21 trail boss and now it’s on my 22 Zr2. 
 

https://www.roughcountry.com/gm-low-profile-tonneau-cover-4712058c.html#228=496

This looks very nice. Nice enough for me to consider spending more $$. Would it dent if a child climbed on top?
 

  • 10 months later...
Posted

Hi.  I picked up a 2023 Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate on Friday.  Dealer installed the Rev cover.  Been raining a looked inside and a lot of water.  Water was coming in along the rails and near the drain tube. 

 

One thing is I went to check the drain tubes. I pulled the tube off the drain on the rail and water gushed out.  It was as if the tube was blocked or kinked.  They installed the tube through the hole on the side but did not trim the tube.  I am assuming the tube got kinked or turned up in the cavity so it would not let the water drain.  So after watching a video, I trimmed the tube so only about 1/2" to an 1" sticks through the hole.   A few hours later (still raining here) I check the tube and no water gushed out like before.

 

Anyone think this is an issue with just half an inch to an inch of the tub sticking through the hole?  It looks like the picture in the previous posted by @jaxcam02 but not a lot of tube pushed through.  I thought about sticking it through the cab side wall through one of the larger openings for a tie down but figured I would stick with the side wall hole.

 

I need to let it dry out and check it again next time it rains.

 

If I still have an issue I will contact the installing dealer (100 miles from me) or @GMCustomerService help.

 

I may go to my local dealer as well where I will have it services.  Just not sure if they will charge me.  Although the cover was installed before delivery so it may be covered under the GN warranty.

 

thanks,

 

Mike

 

 

Posted

I have the REV cover (rebranded BakFlip) and there is water around the tailgate area. Not a big deal and the actual tailgates aren't sealed to begin with. If they are leaking significantly, it's from installer errors. I've had 4 BakFlip tonneaus and now this REV. All have been good. 20230126_152648.thumb.jpg.cc60aaeb0c9f056e203f929b754251c0.jpg

Posted

thanks.  I do think it is an installer error. 

 

1. Drain tubes not draining.

2. the last 3" of each rail closest to the cab, the rail looks to be not flush.  Maybe 1/32" to 1/16" gap.  

3. at the cab side, there is maybe a 1/16" to 1/8" opening on each side (see photo below).  you can see daylight when inside the bed and it is light outside.  It does look like the rail is all the way up against the bulkhead.  Maybe I need to put a little foam in those two spots too.

 

Did you install the drain tubes through the side wall or through the bulk head tie downs?  If through he side wall, did you trim the tubes so just enough goes through the hole?  Is there any issue with water going into this cavity that looks like otherwise it would not see water?

 

Here is a photo close to the bulkhead.  Water can get into that spot.  It feels like the rail is all the way again the bulkhead but probably need to take the cover off to confirm.

 

image.thumb.png.286799c8b605b7e89deb1e00f6a508de.png

Posted
7 hours ago, Rinconmike said:

thanks.  I do think it is an installer error. 

 

1. Drain tubes not draining.

2. the last 3" of each rail closest to the cab, the rail looks to be not flush.  Maybe 1/32" to 1/16" gap.  

3. at the cab side, there is maybe a 1/16" to 1/8" opening on each side (see photo below).  you can see daylight when inside the bed and it is light outside.  It does look like the rail is all the way up against the bulkhead.  Maybe I need to put a little foam in those two spots too.

 

Did you install the drain tubes through the side wall or through the bulk head tie downs?  If through he side wall, did you trim the tubes so just enough goes through the hole?  Is there any issue with water going into this cavity that looks like otherwise it would not see water?

 

Here is a photo close to the bulkhead.  Water can get into that spot.  It feels like the rail is all the way again the bulkhead but probably need to take the cover off to confirm.

 

image.thumb.png.286799c8b605b7e89deb1e00f6a508de.png

Dealer installed prior to me taking delivery. I have the CarbonPro box and never bothered to check the drain tube location. I will though. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,046 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...