Jump to content

Rear wheel liners - anyone installed any yet?

Hoss Dawson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hoss Dawson Enthusiast

Hoss Dawson

Posted
Posted

Hi

Looking for recommendations for Rear wheel well liners for a 2020 Custom. OEM? Husky? Any other brand? Ease of install and pricing appreciated also.

Thanks

Hoss

Sauce Enthusiast

Sauce

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Hoss Dawson said:

Hi

Looking for recommendations for Rear wheel well liners for a 2020 Custom. OEM? Husky? Any other brand? Ease of install and pricing appreciated also.

Thanks

Hoss

I did mine with OEM it comes with all hardware. The husky ones I did buy but returned.... I’m not using self tapping screws in my new truck worth the money with the OEM.

63tdevo Enthusiast

63tdevo

Posted
Posted

I did OEM. they look great and have to,protect the wheel well more than just exposed metal. No brainer.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hoss Dawson Enthusiast

Hoss Dawson

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

I clicked on the link and it does not fit the 2020 but does fit 2019? I thought they were the same. I’m coming up with a different part number for about $30 to $40 more!

Hoss

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
Hi

I clicked on the link and it does not fit the 2020 but does fit 2019? I thought they were the same. I’m coming up with a different part number for about $30 to $40 more!

Hoss

MY2019 has 2 different body styles. 2019 Silverado LD is the old body style. All other trims are new body style. The ones for $30 to $40 more are probably the correct ones. You should be able to go to accessories.chevrolet.com, enter your VIN, and find the correct part. I installed rear liners on my 2020 myself. It's fairly easy, but I had a plastic trim to remove behind the rear wheels at the very bottom of the fender so i could screw in 1 part of the liner. Be careful with the clips. I broke one and had to buy a replacement.

 

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
Gotcha...ever hear of the liners holding water/dirt/road salt in behind and causing rust?
Hoss
I'm not the person to answer that question. The truck i just bought is my first one ever. I've had it 2 weeks.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Gangly Senior Enthusiast

Gangly

Posted
Posted

Purchased and installed the OEM ones.  Its a pretty easy and straight forward install, though I found 2 of the metal clips to be a PITA to install and sit flush for some reason.  I would up putting a small bolt through one of them.

jljii Enthusiast

jljii

Posted
Posted

I put the Husky wheel liners on my 2019 custom trail boss with no issues and would recommend.  All of the holes matched up, and I didn't do any drilling.

2024Denali Enthusiast

2024Denali

Posted
Posted
On 8/15/2020 at 2:20 PM, Hoss Dawson said:

Hi

Looking for recommendations for Rear wheel well liners for a 2020 Custom. OEM? Husky? Any other brand? Ease of install and pricing appreciated also.

Thanks

Hoss

I purchased and installed the Husky ones - found a good, cheaper new set on eBay. I have had zero issues, and would recommend. The install can be tough, but you just have to get the bends right. IMO, I like the look the give when they are cleaned up better than OEM, but I bet you would be happy either way!

  • 2 weeks later...
Ed/2020RST Enthusiast

Ed/2020RST

Posted
Posted

The spray-on is just a coating and has its use but the liners themselves cover up all the mechanical parts/sheet metal joints etcs and also helps to prevent water, mud, dirt grimm from entering said parts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...