Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have a 2020 trail boss custom 4.3l. Probably a stupid question, but does anyone know if this has the cylinder deactivation? If so does it take it to 4 cylinders or 3?  Also is there a way to turn it off?   

Edited by 20silverado20
Posted (edited)

There are two current versions of the Gen V 4.3 known by the names LV1, non AFM and LV3 wit AFM. No pickup has been fitted with the LV1 yet. All GM pickups that have a 4.3 have AFM. There in may lay the confusion of the ignorant. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Wow, no need for the name calling!!  Just kidding,   thanks for explaining it to me.  1 more thing, do you think this is the reason my v6 sounds like a sewing machine? Because its running on 4 cylinders? or are these engines just noisy? 

Posted
18 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

There are two current versions of the Gen V 4.3 known by the names LV, non AFM and LV3 wit AFM. No pickup has been fitted with the LV1 yet. All GM pickups that have a 4.3 have AFM. There in may lay the confusion of the ignorant. 

Even when your being helpful you can still remain a D***

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, 20silverado20 said:

Wow, no need for the name calling!!  Just kidding,   thanks for explaining it to me.  1 more thing, do you think this is the reason my v6 sounds like a sewing machine? Because its running on 4 cylinders? or are these engines just noisy? 

It idles on all six so any clicking and clacking at idle is a product of the direct injection system. Normal.


When driving under light load and it drops cylinders you may also notice a different sound and slight vibration.

Posted
6 hours ago, 20silverado20 said:

Wow, no need for the name calling!!  Just kidding,   thanks for explaining it to me.  1 more thing, do you think this is the reason my v6 sounds like a sewing machine? Because its running on 4 cylinders? or are these engines just noisy? 

1.) Your welcome

2.) I wasn't call you ignorant. I was calling  your source ignorant. Back up and reread my post. I think you will get it.

3.) That sewing machine sound is the high pressure pump humming away. 

 

That out of the way the three musketeers (TNTSilverado, OnTheReal & f8lvnm) who offer no help seem to have problems with English contextually. Best responce....name calling. :crackup:

 

PS I see a typo in my first post which I corrected. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

1.) Your welcome

2.) I wasn't call you ignorant. I was calling  your source ignorant. Back up and reread my post. I think you will get it.

3.) That sewing machine sound is the high pressure pump humming away. 

 

That out of the way the three musketeers (TNTSilverado, OnTheReal & f8lvnm) who offer no help seem to have problems with English contextually. Best responce....name calling. :crackup:

 

PS I see a typo in my first post which I corrected. 

Its all good.  Your answers were very specific, and exactly what i was looking for.  Thank you.  I appreciate it!!  

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

That out of the way the three musketeers (TNTSilverado, OnTheReal & f8lvnm) who offer no help seem to have problems with English contextually. Best responce....name calling. :crackup:

 

PS I see a typo in my first post which I corrected. 

I’ll take “someone who shouldn’t be critiquing others about the English language” for $200, Alex. 
 

Your posts are riddled with poor grammar, misspellings and the improper use of “your” vs “you’re”. Almost unreadable at times.

  • Like 2
Posted

The 4.3l is a great motor. You’ll love it. As for the other comment by Teddy Ruxpin.  Move along old man. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, 20silverado20 said:

I've heard good things about it, i just wish it didn't sound like a sewing machine lol

I love the one I have.

:seeya:

Posted

I had a 4.3 in my fleet, it was rock solid, excellent runner from one port to the other. Burned just as much fuel as the 5.3’s and the 6.2’s, was the #1 choice for inner city driving by my employees. The workers also loved its reliability, zero breakdowns, wish I could’ve said the same for the diesels and 5.3’s.

Unless you’re towing it’s the great little engine that could.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
6 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

I had a 4.3 in my fleet, it was rock solid, excellent runner from one port to the other. Burned just as much fuel as the 5.3’s and the 6.2’s, was the #1 choice for inner city driving by my employees. The workers also loved its reliability, zero breakdowns, wish I could’ve said the same for the diesels and 5.3’s.

Unless you’re towing it’s the great little engine that could.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Was that motor the Ecotec3 Gen 5 or an earlier 'iron' 4.3? My father has run those iron motors to over 3/4 million miles. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,920
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Frank V
    Newest Member
    Frank V
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,242 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...