Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I love auto 4wd during our Michigan winters. I’d rather have it over a level. But if there is a level that works with the auto 4wd I’d like to know. 

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, NonTypicalCPA said:

I love auto 4wd during our Michigan winters. I’d rather have it over a level. But if there is a level that works with the auto 4wd I’d like to know. 

Do you ever haul or tow anything with your truck?  I personally don't think the AT4s look that "unlevel" in stock form and the leveled ones look dorky with a case of beer in the back.  That combined with guys breaking ball joints by leveling the pre lifted trucks makes me want to keep it stock.

 

-Eli

  • Like 3
Posted
38 minutes ago, NonTypicalCPA said:

Most levels say you should not run in auto 4wd after install. 

Which is a huge red flag in my mind for CV angles.  Even though they look fine.

  • Like 4
Posted

^ This. Stacking leveling kits and having to be cautious about what to run would have me second guessing my choices. Sprinkle in the fact that a level truck looks nose high due to the body and any kind of weight in the back for the occasional haul would look like it's over loaded due to sag.

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted

I have zero intentions of levelling my truck but this is news to me and got me curious If some kits recommend not using auto 4wd, what about 4hi or 4lo? What does the auto have to do with anything? If you cant use any of the 4wd’s then why the **** would anyone get a 4wd truck?

  • Like 1
Posted

Any 4x4 truck without a straight axle in the front is going to run the risk of damaging and even snapping the cv’s. The more you weight you run (Bigger tires/wheels), and the higher the truck is lifted means you’re putting extra strain on components that weren’t designed for that by GM engineers. So yes it’s a risk, however most people who are leveling their trucks aren’t looking to do any serious off roads. These trucks are not built to go to Moab, we don’t even have a selectable locker, so I would assume 90% of guys buying 4 wheel drive trucks almost never use it. Lifting a truck is mostly for looks so cruising around on the highway and the occasional 4auto in wet or gravel roads shouldn’t be a problem. I would not recommend dropping to 4lo and trying to crawl over the rubicon...even with a stock truck.   

Posted

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.  

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, davidlewis1010 said:

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.  

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

 

The short answer to the OP's question is that any "level" kit for AT4/Trail boss may impact use of auto 4WD.  CV angles with level are to extreme in the front, no matter the level kit mfg.  the issue is when the truck moves into 4wd under some conditions the front diff suffers extreme torque and it can be severely damaged.  RL added a note to the SST kit after a few months, due to customer complaints of loud noises and a few customers who complained they lost their front diff's when using 4WD auto.  When you speak with knowlegable shops they all seem to agree that 4" of lift is the point of no return - so 2" added to AT4 + 2" more. 

 

Unfortunately the RL level kit, noted above has no mention of the "auto 4WD" function impact, but their SST kit they have the following note  "NOTE:  Use of Auto 4 HI feature not recommended",  the only difference is the rear block.  It is 1.75" level - so 3.75" overall, where SST states it is a 2" level (so 4" overall).  The upper control arms correct the angles for the upper ball joints, but do nothing for the CV axel angles. 

 

I had a 2019 AT4 Carbon Pro - I installed the RL SST kit - CV angles were not good - no auto 4WD.  I traded in for a 2020 AT4 Carbon Pro with trailer tow mirros, as I tow a lot and I did not want any issues up front.   Pictures below. 

 

For the 2020 I went with BDS 2.5" lift - which provides proper CV angles (better than AT4 from Factory).  I have the full program with Fox 2.5 DSC coilover shocks - so a $4,700 deal installed.   I love it, but it is a lot of money if you don't go offroad much and just want a level.  

 

If you want to use Auto 4WD, you will need a lift kit that lowers your front diff, to keep CV angles within OEM spec.  You can buy BDS or Zone 4" lift kit without the Fox shocks and save some $ - but you are still looking at $2,086 for BDS and $1,300 for zone (which is made by BDS).   But that is 6" over stock -so 4" over your AT4 OEM ride height - currently they do not offer the 2.5" lift kit without the fox coliovers (which is 4.5" vs stock 4" for AT4).  There are other mfg. of proper lift kits as well that can get you same outcome, as long as they have a diff lowering brackets in their lift kit.  Zone is the best overall value, for just the lift. 

 

RL SST: https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019.html

BDS:  https://bds-suspension.com/product?kid=749H

Zone:  https://zoneoffroad.com/products/4-in-ifs-suspension-lift-kit-2019-2020-chevy-trail-boss-gmc-at4?variant=33403092729944


Below are photos of my 2019 with RL SST kit and my 2020 with BDS 2.5" kit - you will note the CV angles are level on the BDS and are quite extreme on the RL (note boots).

 

There are no short cuts for AT4/Trailboss to do a proper level or lift.  Only other options other have tried is a shorter block in the rear for the level.  That is the cheapest option, but may not work the best. 

 

2019 AT4 - Ready Lift SST Kit - CV Angels - level ground 

IMG_8840.thumb.JPG.a07a57722c6527f062a5d102ac0e46c3.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift Kit CV angles - level ground 

1471550584_BDS-CVAngle-None!.thumb.JPG.9ef933d15ddb69ecc43a6ead0114e053.JPG

 

2019 AT4 Stock 

IMG_8517.thumb.JPG.a2cbf6a3ba0e0913542876db12358da7.JPG

 

2019 SST RL Level - dead level 

DP.thumb.JPG.6d7e9fb393fc50a3b92cff07f48b752e.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift - Fox shocks - a little rake 

1767178234_TruckFox2.thumb.JPG.c7935ae8998a5481cfcd49aa771ce791.JPG

Edited by Supercup
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Supercup said:

 

The short answer to the OP's question is that any "level" kit for AT4/Trail boss may impact use of auto 4WD.  CV angles with level are to extreme in the front, no matter the level kit mfg.  the issue is when the truck moves into 4wd under some conditions the front diff suffers extreme torque and it can be severely damaged.  RL added a note to the SST kit after a few months, due to customer complaints of loud noises and a few customers who complained they lost their front diff's when using 4WD auto.  When you speak with knowlegable shops they all seem to agree that 4" of lift is the point of no return - so 2" added to AT4 + 2" more. 

 

Unfortunately the RL level kit, noted above has no mention of the "auto 4WD" function impact, but their SST kit they have the following note  "NOTE:  Use of Auto 4 HI feature not recommended",  the only difference is the rear block.  It is 1.75" level - so 3.75" overall, where SST states it is a 2" level (so 4" overall).  The upper control arms correct the angles for the upper ball joints, but do nothing for the CV axel angles. 

 

I had a 2019 AT4 Carbon Pro - I installed the RL SST kit - CV angles were not good - no auto 4WD.  I traded in for a 2020 AT4 Carbon Pro with trailer tow mirros, as I tow a lot and I did not want any issues up front.   Pictures below. 

 

For the 2020 I went with BDS 2.5" lift - which provides proper CV angles (better than AT4 from Factory).  I have the full program with Fox 2.5 DSC coilover shocks - so a $4,700 deal installed.   I love it, but it is a lot of money if you don't go offroad much and just want a level.  

 

If you want to use Auto 4WD, you will need a lift kit that lowers your front diff, to keep CV angles within OEM spec.  You can buy BDS or Zone 4" lift kit without the Fox shocks and save some $ - but you are still looking at $2,086 for BDS and $1,300 for zone (which is made by BDS).   But that is 6" over stock -so 4" over your AT4 OEM ride height - currently they do not offer the 2.5" lift kit without the fox coliovers (which is 4.5" vs stock 4" for AT4).  There are other mfg. of proper lift kits as well that can get you same outcome, as long as they have a diff lowering brackets in their lift kit.  Zone is the best overall value, for just the lift. 

 

RL SST: https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019.html

BDS:  https://bds-suspension.com/product?kid=749H

Zone:  https://zoneoffroad.com/products/4-in-ifs-suspension-lift-kit-2019-2020-chevy-trail-boss-gmc-at4?variant=33403092729944


Below are photos of my 2019 with RL SST kit and my 2020 with BDS 2.5" kit - you will note the CV angles are level on the BDS and are quite extreme on the RL (note boots).

 

There are no short cuts for AT4/Trailboss to do a proper level or lift.  Only other options other have tried is a shorter block in the rear for the level.  That is the cheapest option, but may not work the best. 

 

2019 AT4 - Ready Lift SST Kit - CV Angels - level ground 

IMG_8840.thumb.JPG.a07a57722c6527f062a5d102ac0e46c3.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift Kit CV angles - level ground 

1471550584_BDS-CVAngle-None!.thumb.JPG.9ef933d15ddb69ecc43a6ead0114e053.JPG

 

2019 AT4 Stock 

IMG_8517.thumb.JPG.a2cbf6a3ba0e0913542876db12358da7.JPG

 

2019 SST RL Level - dead level 

DP.thumb.JPG.6d7e9fb393fc50a3b92cff07f48b752e.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift - Fox shocks - a little rake 

1767178234_TruckFox2.thumb.JPG.c7935ae8998a5481cfcd49aa771ce791.JPG

Did your 2019 use the stock upper control arms?  That angle doesn’t look good.  Your 2020 kit looks ideal, but it should for the cost. Here is a pic of my 2020 with the RL level kit with new upper control arms.  The CV angle is not severe like your 2019 was.  This kit didn’t come out until 2020, so I am curious if maybe you used something different.  This kit splits the spacers between the top and bottom of the coil over.  Putting a spacer on the bottom of the coil over moves the control arm further away while leaving the ball joint and cv angle somewhat unchanged.  ACF4572C-B2BF-4537-B20D-0E5428B20DE5.thumb.jpeg.727797e7aaa63a5989ae681c7b9d375e.jpegI agree that lowering the front diff is the correct way to go to correct the cv angles.  I must disagree with your comment that the upper control arm does not impact CV angles.  The longer arms push the top of the spindle outward to help center the lower ball joint.  This also changes the angle on the cv axle.  

Posted
2 hours ago, davidlewis1010 said:

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.   

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

More info here about the RL advisory to not use it..

 

Posted (edited)
On 10/25/2020 at 7:30 PM, davidlewis1010 said:

Did your 2019 use the stock upper control arms?  That angle doesn’t look good.  Your 2020 kit looks ideal, but it should for the cost. Here is a pic of my 2020 with the RL level kit with new upper control arms.  The CV angle is not severe like your 2019 was.  This kit didn’t come out until 2020, so I am curious if maybe you used something different.  This kit splits the spacers between the top and bottom of the coil over.  Putting a spacer on the bottom of the coil over moves the control arm further away while leaving the ball joint and cv angle somewhat unchanged.  ACF4572C-B2BF-4537-B20D-0E5428B20DE5.thumb.jpeg.727797e7aaa63a5989ae681c7b9d375e.jpegI agree that lowering the front diff is the correct way to go to correct the cv angles.  I must disagree with your comment that the upper control arm does not impact CV angles.  The longer arms push the top of the spindle outward to help center the lower ball joint.  This also changes the angle on the cv axle.  

 

2019 did have Ready Lift Upper control arms - however they are not "longer" per say - they just change the angles, to correct the geometry of the upper ball joint, to reduce the wear.  

 

Below is video from Ready lift that walks through their AT4/Trail Boss level kit and SST kit.    See minute 1:37 - 2:04, 3:55 - 4:20 and 5:20 - 5:40 to hear about control arms.  If you stop video at 4:22 you can see the control arms (stock and Ready lift) - if you measure from the bolt hole to the tip and see they are basically the same length.

 

I do agree  there are many after market control arms that are longer, but it does not appear to be the case here.   Also note the "thicker" end of the RL UCA, reduces tire clearance on the inside versus the stock UCA's - see photo below of clearance with stock 27/65/18's on a 18mm offset Method NV 18"x9" wheel.  That photo is my 2019 with RL SST kit installed.  With stock wheels, which are 26 mm offset, I could not get my finger in there - too close.   That is about 5/16's of an inch of clearance. 

 

IMG_8828.thumb.JPG.4eea0193c4acb8c3ede59614fa68c684.JPG  

 

LINK: 

 

Edited by Supercup
  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/25/2020 at 11:34 AM, davidlewis1010 said:

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.  

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

Quote from ReadyLift in writing: "We don't suggest 4wd auto to be used " This was in reference to a list of questions I wrote them on the 1.75 AT4/Trail Boss level kit. That kit includes new UCAs. Congnito and BDS both told me same about their level kits. 

Edited by Mark Scannura
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...