Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
38 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

 I have a 12 Sierra 5.3 6 speed 3.42's. I live in the mountains of Colorado. I purchased this truck knowing the heaviest thing I would tow regularly was my boat. It weighs about 3500-4000 lbs. The truck does OK with this except pulling grades. You have to down shift to kep up your speed. This causes higher RPM's. Sometimes running it harder than I like so I just find a gear and slow down. The 6 speed trans is the killer.

I have towed heavier 8-9 K pounds and it works hard in the mountains. 

I agree with evad and dieselfan1.

If I was towing heavier I would definaely get a 2500 with the big gasser at minimum. More gears in the trans the better. 

Lol, i used to tow that up grades with an fj60 landcruiser with 120hp on a good day. 355hp having a tough time with 4k lbs.

 

1st world problems to the max

Posted

Let me clarify. Didn't have problems. Just in some cases towing grades I don't run the truck hard so I slow down into a lower gear and lower RPM's. If your not in a hurry no big deal. I'm not in a hurry. It would be nice to maintain speed limit though. I towed a lot with a 93 Silvy 1500 5.7 373 gears 4 speed. This truck is a big improvement. 

Posted

Fun facts.

 

1.) 5.3 Ecotec makes 350 lb/ft or more between 3100 and 5200 rpm peaking at 4100 rpm

2.) Top gears in automatic transmissions are OVERDRIVES. Not really heavy tow gearing.

 

To get this motor pulling at it's peak torque and on stock tire sizes and a wish for 65 mph speeds would require running in 4th gear with a 4.56 diff....4,100 rpm. You would have 383 * (4.88 * 1.15) = 2,149 pounds feet axle torque. 

 

With a 3.42 and pulling 3rd gear at 65 mph 383 * (3.42 * 1.51) = 2,004 pounds feet axle torque. 

 

But you guys want high gear? 383 * ( 3.42 * 0.67) = 878 pounds feet torque. 

 

What your asking for is diesel like performance from a gas motor or torque limited turbo gas motor perhaps. 

 

You can stuff 10 extra gears in that transmission  and it will always be about multiplying what is available. If you want to tow at 1500 rpm where there is less torque then you have to multiply it more...lower gears....slower speeds. 

 

2014 Silverado Delivers Power, Efficiency and Value

 

You guys bought motors that peak torque at 4100 rpm and then don't want to spin it to use it. What is a fella to do? ? 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Fun facts.

 

1.) 5.3 Ecotec makes 350 lb/ft or more between 3100 and 5200 rpm peaking at 4100 rpm

2.) Top gears in automatic transmissions are OVERDRIVES. Not really heavy tow gearing.

 

To get this motor pulling at it's peak torque and on stock tire sizes and a wish for 65 mph speeds would require running in 4th gear with a 4.56 diff....4,100 rpm. You would have 383 * (4.88 * 1.15) = 2,149 pounds feet axle torque. 

 

With a 3.42 and pulling 3rd gear at 65 mph 383 * (3.42 * 1.51) = 2,004 pounds feet axle torque. 

 

But you guys want high gear? 383 * ( 3.42 * 0.67) = 878 pounds feet torque. 

 

What your asking for is diesel like performance from a gas motor or torque limited turbo gas motor perhaps. 

 

You can stuff 10 extra gears in that transmission  and it will always be about multiplying what is available. If you want to tow at 1500 rpm where there is less torque then you have to multiply it more...lower gears....slower speeds. 

 

2014 Silverado Delivers Power, Efficiency and Value

 

You guys bought motors that peak torque at 4100 rpm and then don't want to spin it to use it. What is a fella to do? ? 

I'm not afraid to spin mine. The 5.3 is a stout platform. Made to rev if you ask me.

I ran in 3rd and 4th gear last trip on the way home into a 20-25 headwind. 3500-4500 rpm for hours to maintain 60-62 mph. 

The gas mileage is the killer here. 6-7mpg - 150 miles to a tank max.

Another thing I noticed is after running 4 grand for a while it warms up to around 230° then the thermostat opens and brings it down to 210°. Rinse and repeat.

Tranny runs at 190°-195° steady under these conditions.

If you're not afraid to run at that rpm's the truck will tow it just fine , just requires a lot of gas.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

If you are talking about the yellow sheet, that is a scale ticket. In this case a private entity, but similar as what you would get from a weigh station on the highway.

 

The numbers are showing the weight at different spots on the truck, and a grand total.

OK!  Thank-you.  I thought it was the door sticker.

Posted
13 hours ago, CamGTP said:

The tow rating sticker does not exist on the K2XX trucks, that is only on the 2019+ model year trucks.

 

The only thing you will find on your 2016 is the VIN sticker that shows the build date and gross vehicle weight without the trailer.

 

I stole this from google but it looks like this.

 

5c219a75c1b5f3a19b1362f0ff1c903e.jpg

These are the only stickers I found on my door(s) and glove box.  Checked all four doors, the jambs front and back.   

2016GMCSierra1500SLE-A1.jpg

2016GMCSierra1500SLE-B1.jpg

Posted

Ken,

What trailers are you looking at?

I'm looking at this one for next year.

2021 Wildwood 24RLXL. I was quoted $17,980 plus tax and license.

Empty around 5000 lbs.

Sloped front for less wind resistance. Nice setup for the price. These tow nice a freind has a similar setup(Salem) and tows with a 2017 Sierra crew cab 5.3 6spd 3.42 and never said he has trouble although he only goes up north with it (140 miles fairly flat) once a month.

I'm fairly confident that this trailer will tow easier than my current trailer with the flat front.d549f5deb9ce72712a4892286372a9f9.jpg

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

3a02006677542c26cb4f12997ee34569.jpg

 

 

Posted

Haven't started looking at any RV's at this point. 

Plan to stick with a local dealer for simplicity of warranty and repair.

 

Posted
Haven't started looking at any RV's at this point. 
Plan to stick with a local dealer for simplicity of warranty and repair.
 
Local is great as long as you are in a small town. If you are in a large metro area and bring it for warranty work plan on not getting it back for a month or two. It's a big joke, the dealers take your money and then when you need something fixed you are on the back burner. My friend just bought a new Arctic Wolf fifth wheel. The 12 volt refrigerator quit first trip. He brought it back to dealer and they had to order a new one. They had it for 7 weeks. Lame.
The RV world has exploded since coronavirus. The dealers can't keep up with the warranty work.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, dieselfan1 said:

Local is great as long as you are in a small town. If you are in a large metro area and bring it for warranty work plan on not getting it back for a month or two. It's a big joke, the dealers take your money and then when you need something fixed you are on the back burner. My friend just bought a new Arctic Wolf fifth wheel. The 12 volt refrigerator quit first trip. He brought it back to dealer and they had to order a new one. They had it for 7 weeks. Lame.
The RV world has exploded since coronavirus. The dealers can't keep up with the warranty work.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

Out of curiosity, wouldn't it have been smarter to let the dealership see and diagnose the problem. 

Order the new frig while keeping the old frig, regardless if working while you wait for new, then bring back for swap out once in. 

At least you could still go camping.  May have to rough it with a cooler full of ice. 

Just a thought.  Seven weeks is a long time.        

  

Posted

Go over to any RV forum and there are horror stories galore.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...