Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

If they are eliminating this kit I wonder what the reasoning is? I think I'll wait it out a bit before proceeding. Could be an improved kit to follow.....or could be long term issues found with the original kit that need to be addressed before we'll see it available again. Anybody now for sure what's up? Seems odd they would drop a popular item so soon after introduction....

Edited by Bgill
Posted

This would suck if true.

 

I've been waffling back and forth on buying the GM lift for my 19' HC.  My only hesitation is if any sensors or cameras need to be recalibrated and if so, if the dealer does that when they do the install (assuming I choose dealer for install).

Posted

84768243 is the active # as of July 1st 2020.  No notice of discontinuation, it is listed as a ship direct part that will back order when ordered.  A dealer can put an order in for one, just no ETA as to when the supplier will have stock.  

Posted
17 minutes ago, newdude said:

84768243 is the active # as of July 1st 2020.  No notice of discontinuation, it is listed as a ship direct part that will back order when ordered.  A dealer can put an order in for one, just no ETA as to when the supplier will have stock.  

Good to know. I have a friend that used to work at a dealer and he could look up part numbers for me. Hopefully I’ll be able to get one soon. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, JAshworth03 said:

This would suck if true.

 

I've been waffling back and forth on buying the GM lift for my 19' HC.  My only hesitation is if any sensors or cameras need to be recalibrated and if so, if the dealer does that when they do the install (assuming I choose dealer for install).

I'm in the same boat as you. 2020 HC w/3.0 Duramax been waffling between the GM kit, Bilstein adjustable height shocks or waiting for the new BDS kit specific to my truck to be released and going w/a 4" lift. Keeping all the technology functioning properly is definitely a major consideration in the final decision I will need to make sometime soon....

Posted

Not to thread high jack but if I want to level my 2020 Elevation but obviously not have any issues with the suspension/ball joints etc (or at least no issues I could have controlled), is the GM kit (84768243) the right one?

 

The dealer quoted me ~500 installed, headlights re aimed, alignment done, etc.  Which sounded good considering I retain the factory warranty.

Posted

I just got an email saying my order was canceled. The kit is on “indefinite back order”.  It might be time to look at other options. 

Posted

Pic of what's included:

 

https://www.chevrolet.com/performance-parts/vehicle-upgrades/new-silverado/suspension

 

Introducing the only 2-inch Suspension Lift designed, engineered, tested, and backed† by Chevrolet specifically for the All-New 2019 Silverado. Developed by the same vehicle-level engineers who built the truck, the system was tested under the same grueling conditions and will not void the New-Vehicle Limited Warranty.†

With separate systems for select 2WD and 4WD All-New 2019 Silverado models, each system features front and rear passive monotube dampers specifically tuned to the chassis, jounce bumpers, rear leaf spring spacers, and much more for fully integrated installation. A front camera reconfiguration† and an Electronic Power Steering calibration† is included so that all driver-assist systems continue to function seamlessly. Read the vehicle Owner’s Manual for important driver-assist system feature limitations and information. Expert installation by an authorized GM dealer is recommended.†

 


PART NO. 84629787 /2-inch Suspension Lift – 4WD

PART NO. 84629789 /2-inch Suspension Lift – 2WD

Posted
On 1/5/2021 at 10:07 AM, Blee said:

I saw it on a few websites this weekend. I tried to order one place and it said discontinued. I was able to order from another and it canceled the order yesterday. I did order from another GM outlet yesterday and so far it hasn’t been canceled. Maybe they’re a few still around. Someone at a dealer with access to parts might know more. 

I have just lifted my 2019 elevation 2 inches using non GM  lift kit.  I used the Ready Lift  2.25 inch blocks in the rear and had a spacer machined out of aluminum for the bump stop.  Used the Bilstein B8 5100 shocks for the AT4 right round.  Still need to fit the front shocks as I have a 2 inch leveling kit in there at the moment.  II wanted to lift the front a bit more (with the 5100 shocks you can go stock AT4 height or  +.55 inch or +1.1 inch higher), but not sure about taking the front up more than the existing two inches (stock AT4 height) on the standard CV axles that the elevation came with.

Posted

I have just lifted my 2019 elevation 2 inches using non GM  lift kit.  I used the Ready Lift  2.25 inch blocks in the rear and had a spacer machined out of aluminum for the bump stop.  Used the Bilstein B8 5100 shocks for the AT4 right round.  Still need to fit the front shocks as I have a 2 inch leveling kit in there at the moment.  II wanted to lift the front a bit more (with the 5100 shocks you can go stock AT4 height or  +.55 inch or +1.1 inch higher), but not sure about taking the front up more than the existing two inches (stock AT4 height) on the standard CV axles that the elevation came with.

 

For info her is the spacer that I had made up  for the rear bump the rear bump stop

 

Aluminium spacer block drawing.pdf

Posted (edited)
On 1/3/2021 at 8:15 PM, lapoolboy said:

The included axles are longer.  

 

I share your confusion, it seems to me that if the TB/AT4 trucks already have these longer axles, why can't we bolt in the "non-TB/AT4" Bilsteins that give 2" lift?  The regular trucks can get the full 2" with the "short" axles, but the TB/AT4 can only get 1.1" lift with the longer axles.  Makes no sense to me.  Once the struts are out, the only thing left making it a TB/AT4 are the marginally longer axles.

 

This is how I understand it. TB/AT4 has the same stock upper control arms (UCAs), as the non-TB/AT4. The TB/AT4 lift, (factory or OEM aftermarket) has the extended axles, different shocks, etc. So that 2" lift is occurring within the limitation of the stock UCAs. If you add additional lift of any kind to the TB/AT4 you exceed the engineered limits of the UCA. The issue with added lift to the TB/AT4 isn't axle length it is the UCA.

 

In other words, the stock UCA has a tolerence of 0"-2" of lift. if you add and additional 1" lift to the 2" lift of the TB/AT4 you are effectively at a 3" lift and outside the UCA engineered limits.

 

JMHO

No expertise implied or expressed

Edited by RWTJR
Added the "In other words" in hope of clarification
Posted
18 minutes ago, RWTJR said:

This is how I understand it. TB/AT4 has the same stock upper control arms (UCAs), as the non-TB/AT4. The TB/AT4 lift, (factory or OEM aftermarket) has the extended axles, different shocks, etc. So that 2" lift is occurring within the limitation of the stock UCAs. If you add additional lift of any kind to the TB/AT4 you exceed the engineered limits of the UCA. The issue with added lift to the TB/AT4 isn't axle length it is the UCA.

 

In other words, the stock UCA has a tolerence of 0"-2" of lift. if you add and additional 1" lift to the 2' lift of the TB/AT4 you are effectively at a 3" lift and outside the UCA engineered limits.

 

JMHO

No expertise implied or expressed

So can I install aftermarket UCAs and use the "non-Trailboss" Bilstein adjustable shocks to get the full 2" lift instead of the 1.1" max lift available with the TrailBoss-specific Bilsteins?

Posted
23 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

So can I install aftermarket UCAs and use the "non-Trailboss" Bilstein adjustable shocks to get the full 2" lift instead of the 1.1" max lift available with the TrailBoss-specific Bilsteins?

 

No, it shouldn't work that way.

 

The non-TB/AT4 Bilstein shock 2" lift should effectively give you the same lift height suspension as you have now. As far as the "lifting" components on the TB/AT4 front suspension go, basically the only difference from the non-TB/AT4 is the shock length and spring perch location. The 2" of lift made by the non-TB/AT4 Bilstein is made by changing/adjusting the spring perch location to essentially the same position/lift equivalent as what you have on your current Ranchos, no net gain.

 

In other words,  the non-TB/AT4 Bilstein adjustable shocks at 2'' would just give you the same 2" as your current TB/AT4 suspension setup. Your replacing 2" of lift with 2" of lift, so no additional lift. 

 

BTW, UCAs have virtually nothing to do with 'lifting" the truck. They allow for space, movement and maintain proper suspension geometry. They are replaced at certain lift heights to allow space for movement and maintain proper geometry after the lift (oversimplification).

 

All measurement/lift numbers are approximate.

 

JMHO

No expertise implied or expressed.

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 2,187 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...