Jump to content

LT5 or Built & Blown  

11 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey there guys,

 

I just picked up a 2020 Sierra 2 door as a project truck.  Its heading into the body shop early February for some mods I'll disclose later.  I'm looking to hotrod this truck.

 

My question is this, should I go with a factory LT5 at 755 horsepower or should I go with a custom built 6.2 with a blower and push it up to 800-850hp?   My attraction to the LT5 is the "stock'ness" of the crate motor.

 

 

 

Thank you for your opinion.

Edited by Descartian
Posted

Well technically they sell the 2 door regular bed versions in Mexico too.....

 

That's the part of the body shop ill get into later but its going to be a 2 door with a short 69" bed. (and 4x4) and I'm in the States.

Posted

I’d go the blower route. I’ve done both. If it’s a daily especially. You have the option of pulley changing to fit the mood. Or tooling around in a tame vehicle if you just want to cruise. I’ve gone form 6 to 12 lbs of boost in ten minutes with a pulley change. In my case 100 HP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Looks like a long bed regular cab is about to be shortened......really shortened.

 

Sounds like a fun project !

Posted
28 minutes ago, Enough said:

Looks like a long bed regular cab is about to be shortened......really shortened.

 

Sounds like a fun project !

Yes, yes and yes. 
 

Talked to a well respected speed shop today. Initially wanted me to keep the original 5.3 and have it worked over with a supercharger. Said I could easily get 500rwhp out of it but after talking about future needs the 6.2 will be a better fit, even seemed excited about putting the puzzle together needed to adapt the LT5. I’m leaning that direction with some mods (headers/cam/etc) and port injection.  
 

if you have a good argument against it let me know. 

Posted

All I know is that is going to take a wizard or maybe a miracle to make all the computer stuff work if you keep factory computers. The 2019+ stuff is so limited and there is zero TCM support with HP Tuners.

 

Obviously would be different if you are just using this as a body/chassis and went with an older PCM/TCM or were doing a stand alone system with digital dash and yadda yadda.

Posted

I had a 2016 Regular cab short bed with a stock 5.3 and 3.42 rear end with factory locking diff for a couple of years. In the rain it was like driving a go cart. You had to get used to driving sideways.

 

Lopping another 10-12 inches out of the wheelbase and doubling the horsepower should make things even more interesting.

 

I would love to see pictures of the shortening process. Many years ago my Dad and I shortened an F-250 crew cab 4WD down to a regular cab short bed. The frame had to be shortened 33-1/2", the brake line had an extension in it that we took out and connected the line back together, there wire 6 wires that had to be shortened, and the driveshaft had to be shortened. Things were a lot simpler in 1979 !

Posted
9 hours ago, Enough said:

I had a 2016 Regular cab short bed with a stock 5.3 and 3.42 rear end with factory locking diff for a couple of years. In the rain it was like driving a go cart. You had to get used to driving sideways.

The auto 4wd should help with this. I also have a couple other vehicles I can drive in the rain that are more sure footed. 

 

9 hours ago, Enough said:

I would love to see pictures of the shortening process. Many years ago my Dad and I shortened an F-250 crew cab 4WD down to a regular cab short bed. The frame had to be shortened 33-1/2", the brake line had an extension in it that we took out and connected the line back together, there wire 6 wires that had to be shortened, and the driveshaft had to be shortened. Things were a lot simpler in 1979 !

 The shop that is going to do the work has done one before (the owners truck). They take 6 or so inches off the back of the frame then cut an existing weld under the cab and take the rest of the material out of that area and reweld it.  Brake lines get shortened, fuel lines go to braided soft lines, parking brake lines moved l, bed and can frame mounts relocated and a new shorter driveshaft (also beefed up to take the increased HP). And then the 4 link coil over rear suspension which for the 6” rear drop will most likely require a frame notch. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The further we got down the LT5 route the harder it looks like it’s going to be. Also all the accessories will have to be for a ZR1 which means $$$$ at every turn.  The engine computer is $4k alone. 
 

Going the built and supercharged 6.2 route.

Posted (edited)

If you're shortening anyway, might as well put the 5'9" box on it...

Edited by redwngr
Posted
8 hours ago, redwngr said:

If you're shortening anyway, might as well put the 5'9" box on it...

Yup. That’s what we’re doing. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...