Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Car values vary by location, mileage, options, and actual condition.  Aside from your gut or what you are seeing elsewhere, what does KBB or similar site show as the value?

Posted

well based on Kijiji ads folks are asking alot...but its just that - an ask. I think hoping to cash in on the Covid price increases lol

Posted

thanks - i did see those but they look like they hang way down. I think i read that also.  I bit the bullet and just had dealer do - GM accessories are fully warranted too i guess.

Posted
thanks - i did see those but they look like they hang way down. I think i read that also.  I bit the bullet and just had dealer do - GM accessories are fully warranted too i guess.
Iirc, if it's installed by the dealer before you take delivery it'll be part of the 3 year/36,000 mile warranty. After you receive the truck I think that goes down to 12 months/12,000 miles. I could be wrong, so don't take my word for it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

just source out out 5 independent companies for a price on your car, youll have a good idea what its worth, wouldnt hesitiate to sell to carvana or whoever for more money.....no tax break though so have to weight that in

Posted
16 hours ago, yzinger said:

Anyone know who makes these?

 

Crew Cab 4-Inch Round Assist Steps in Black | GMC Accessories

 

...I want to add some side steps to the 2021 Sierra but the dealer pricing is too much.

I am looking at rough country black electric. Was able to use coupon and save 100 on 4wp.com currently backordered https://www.roughcountry.com/rc-gm-electric-running-board-steps-psb11920.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9YWDBhDyARIsADt6sGaRySlP9BC4Jq2wreGjWkDX2jxjtpZUjQetUB7dFtthlrd7GgtXq7AaAhLtEALw_wcB

Posted
On 3/17/2021 at 6:48 PM, Transient said:

 

 

 

 

 

Yep, AT4 gets the ventilated seats, factory navigation, memory seats, power folding mirrors, wireless phone charging, etc. Those are all things a fully loaded Trail Boss LT don't get, and the reason why an AT4 costs 10% more. It's like statistics; it depends on how you look at the data. And, I don't believe those differences are worth $6k more. I've already spent $650 adding factory navigation, and received a quote to upgrade to wireless phone charging. That's only $250. That would mean GM is saying power folding mirrors, memory seats, and ventilated seats are worth an additional $5,100.

 

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Don’t forget heated rear seats and spray in bed liner. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, spizike9 said:

Don’t forget heated rear seats and spray in bed liner. 

The biggest things that I wanted in an AT4 that you can't get in lower models:   ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, and the HUD.

 

And if you get a fully loaded lower model, the price difference between that and an AT4 is much less than $5100.

 

A similarly equipped TB and AT4:  TB $59,600  vs AT4 $62,500

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jim E said:

The biggest things that I wanted in an AT4 that you can't get in lower models:   ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, and the HUD.

 

And if you get a fully loaded lower model, the price difference between that and an AT4 is much less than $5100.

 

A similarly equipped TB and AT4:  TB $59,600  vs AT4 $62,500

We sound similar. I like the look of the TB better but when you start comparing apples to apples the AT4 is the better value. 

Posted

Brought her home yesterday folks. Kind of a weird day - I quite enjoyed my car but it was time so mixed feelings most of day. But, I love it no doubt.

 

Pic #3 just curious on the thoughts.  I wonder why no plug for these rear ones. Its all metal down inside there and looks like lots of drainage but still. 

truck1.jpg

Truck2.jpg

truckboxhole.jpg

c52.jpg

Posted
11 minutes ago, yzinger said:

Brought her home yesterday folks. Kind of a weird day - I quite enjoyed my car but it was time so mixed feelings most of day. But, I love it no doubt.

 

Pic #3 just curious on the thoughts.  I wonder why no plug for these rear ones. Its all metal down inside there and looks like lots of drainage but still. 

truck1.jpg

Truck2.jpg

truckboxhole.jpg

c52.jpg

The plug is for your hand to fit into...acts like a handle to help with getting up into the box while putting your foot into the bumper step. Nice trucks congrats. Beautiful camaro!! 

Posted

Thanks. Thats Inferno Orange (which pictures do nothing for).  Man, it worked so good.  I made sure to enjoy it the last couple days - Its not miles per gallon but rather smiles per mile right?

  • Haha 1
Posted

nice, i bought a cayenne red tintcoat one last month

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,993 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...