Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Found part # for the new AT4 high clearance step for RPO code VXW or PDG....GM 84630474. Kind of expensive so I’ll have to wait for a used set. 

 

89E8EFD1-C9AA-4E06-9C9E-1A13D77A9EEF.png

 

B39C059D-AE24-4198-956B-FFF7E5ECC06F.jpeg

F498AE81-F066-4EEA-B2E4-F9B851E782CB.jpeg
 

F33070A2-4FD8-458D-9BE3-56343E5785B7.jpeg

Edited by EXSlider400
Posted

Following -- I want to switch out the 6" oval steps that came on my 2020 AT4. The high clearance steps weren't available yet.

Posted

I have the Chevrolet version of these on my trail boss. I love them a lot. I was able to score a set used off of an HD a few months ago for cheap. So far they are awesome compared to the other off road steps and the flats on my fathers Silverado. The finish is fantastic. 

7BC5E3F7-A062-4316-BAEC-C043693F7F97.png

  • Like 2
Posted

Dang these are what I was wanting for my AT4 but ended up finding a set of Westin HDX for 125$ so I could not pass that deal up. They hang down a little lower then I would like but are not bad. 

Posted

I really want a set of these, they are one of the best looking options, but we've seen a few reports of guys denting the rocker panels on facebook, evidently it's extremely thin/weak on these trucks, and the high and tight running board encourages shoes/boots to hit it harder/more often   Couple guys installed the Bushwacker rocker panel covers to help with the issue.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, todd308 said:

I really want a set of these, they are one of the best looking options, but we've seen a few reports of guys denting the rocker panels on facebook, evidently it's extremely thin/weak on these trucks, and the high and tight running board encourages shoes/boots to hit it harder/more often   Couple guys installed the Bushwacker rocker panel covers to help with the issue.

Thank you. Good helpful comment which is what these forums are for. I wish more would do the same instead of just ignorantly talk $h!t. 👍🏻

Edited by EXSlider400
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 3/22/2021 at 5:07 PM, EXSlider400 said:

Found part # for the new AT4 high clearance step for RPO code VXW or PDG....GM 84630474. Kind of expensive so I’ll have to wait for a used set. 

 

89E8EFD1-C9AA-4E06-9C9E-1A13D77A9EEF.png

 

B39C059D-AE24-4198-956B-FFF7E5ECC06F.jpeg

F498AE81-F066-4EEA-B2E4-F9B851E782CB.jpeg
 

F33070A2-4FD8-458D-9BE3-56343E5785B7.jpeg

I have a set for sale 530-515-8285

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
26 minutes ago, waterman said:

Pain in the butt to clean. The step and the paint near it.

 

Can you post pics of yours?

 

What have you used or done to clean them?

 

-Grover67

Posted
23 hours ago, Grover67 said:

 

Can you post pics of yours?

 

What have you used or done to clean them?

 

-Grover67

My setup is from the factory. The steps have a coating similar to bedliner, they trap dirt continuously. If you get dirt behind them, it is difficult to remove.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/1/2021 at 4:21 PM, Silverflash22 said:

I have a set for sale as well in Michigan. 

 

Hi Silverflash22, new to the board here and a new AT4 owner as well.  On the hunt for a set of these steps and may be interested in the set you have for sale, but am unable to send a direct message on here for some reason (likely because I just registered).  Can you shoot me an email at [email protected]?  Thank you.

Posted
On 6/1/2021 at 4:21 PM, Silverflash22 said:

I have a set for sale as well in Michigan. 

Where about in Michigan and price?  I’m also in Michigan and debating on getting a set.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...