Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JT2000 said:

I was told the UCAs on the AT4 are longer.

 

 

They UCAs the same TB or non TB.  The CV axles are different between the two.  

Edited by newdude
Posted
8 minutes ago, Gangly said:

With the AT4 I would recommend new UCA's if you are gonna do a spacer larger than 1.5" or a suspension increase of greater than 1.5".  Whether you do a spacer kit or a suspension alteration to get the additional 1.5" above the AT4 stock ride height is up to you.  I would suggest you think about your stock suspension and decide whether or not you like the stock ride characteristics or want something different.  If the stock ride is comfortable and to your liking, go with a spacer kit.  If you want a more controlled ride(less roll, bounce, and sway) go with an aftermarket suspension kit but understand that it will generally feel stiffer, or more "planted" like an HD truck but with much better manners.

Yeah I honestly like the ride in my truck a lot. I hated the way my 15 model rode though. Any particular spacer kit and arms you recommend? Also did you see the level kit thread I started about what my dealer said?

Posted

I wish I could, but I have no recommendation on a spacer or UCA kit as I have not installed a set on this truck.  As such, I have not researched the functionality or quality of any particular brand's UCA product.  I would recommend looking at finished product dimensions as certain UCA manufacturers give forewarnings as to what wheel dimensions(width and offset) can fit with their UCA's as well as what lift heights can be utilized with their UCA's.  I would hate to install an aftermarket set of UCA's only to find out I could no longer use the wheels I liked or operate my vehicle at the ride height I preferred.

Posted
42 minutes ago, Gangly said:

I wish I could, but I have no recommendation on a spacer or UCA kit as I have not installed a set on this truck.  As such, I have not researched the functionality or quality of any particular brand's UCA product.  I would recommend looking at finished product dimensions as certain UCA manufacturers give forewarnings as to what wheel dimensions(width and offset) can fit with their UCA's as well as what lift heights can be utilized with their UCA's.  I would hate to install an aftermarket set of UCA's only to find out I could no longer use the wheels I liked or operate my vehicle at the ride height I preferred.

Yeah I’ve looked at some and my tires wouldn’t work. I think I’m just going to let the dealer do it and see how it goes lol.

Posted

i have cognito control arm and stock wheels fit....

Posted
7 hours ago, Dunn said:

i have cognito control arm and stock wheels fit....

I looked that brand up. Do you like them?

Posted

they work, ride is good and my wheels fit.....it just corrects angle and thats all you need, and for wheels to fit, almost any aftermarket arm is stronger than stock....

 

i do like i can replace ball joint easily dtl, 5 screws it pops out put a new one in and off you go.....dont have to take arm off truck.....otherwise you probably cant tell a difference between them aside from looks......if your pounding thru desert thats different animal altogether but am sure you wont or most anyone for that matter

Posted
4 minutes ago, Dunn said:

they work, ride is good and my wheels fit.....it just corrects angle and thats all you need, and for wheels to fit, almost any aftermarket arm is stronger than stock....

 

i do like i can replace ball joint easily dtl, 5 screws it pops out put a new one in and off you go.....dont have to take arm off truck.....otherwise you probably cant tell a difference between them aside from looks......if your pounding thru desert thats different animal altogether but am sure you wont or most anyone for that matter

Nice. Do you have the arms and their 1” level kit?

Posted (edited)

no, i have bilstein AT4 kit with eibach springs (instead of spacer to " push front end" up......sitting on base clip and 3" in front and 2" in rear....i have more clip posistions to higher in front if i want but i want lil bit of rake......think i could get 4.5" out of front but i dont have a drop kit for transfer case and you start getting into all kinds of issues if its not true lift kit at that height.....its good, rides perfect, have all my down travel and gained a bit total i believe.....i dont like spacers and i really dont like RC........lots of ways to achieve what you want......the eibach springs add height over stock springs, about an 1-1.25".......alternative to spacer and its better quality spring

 

 

Edited by Dunn
Posted
34 minutes ago, Dunn said:

no, i have bilstein AT4 kit with eibach springs (instead of spacer to " push front end" up......sitting on base clip and 3" in front and 2" in rear....i have more clip posistions to higher in front if i want but i want lil bit of rake......think i could get 4.5" out of front but i dont have a drop kit for transfer case and you start getting into all kinds of issues if its not true lift kit at that height.....its good, rides perfect, have all my down travel and gained a bit total i believe.....i dont like spacers and i really dont like RC........lots of ways to achieve what you want......the eibach springs add height over stock springs, about an 1-1.25".......alternative to spacer and its better quality spring

 

 

Yeah the 2 dealers in my area both say they use RC 2” level. One uses the regular trucks kit and shaves the kit down some. Neither use other kits and change UCAs. They claim Gm authorizes them to use RC kit.

 

I don’t know enough about it all to argue with them. It makes me nervous though after talking with some on here and after doing some other research. I don’t do any off-roading and pretty much just drive to and from work around 20 minutes. So I don’t need anything crazy expensive.

 

I also don’t want to go cheap either, but good quality. I mostly just want to level out my truck and don’t mind slight rake. I know every truck is a little different and my truck is roughly 2” lower in the front.

 

So make it simple for me on what I should go with and I’ll research it.

Posted

i replaced all 4 of my shocks as how i got the lift.....you already have a lift

 

gonna have to be spacer unless you replace shocks, just get UCA along with it, RC makes one am sure its fine and better than stock.......sure you may never have an issue but lots of them have broke already leveling TB/AT4.....better to be safe than sorry......

 

doesnt have to be a dealer doing install, its pretty straightforward......

 

watch this

 

Aftermarket Upper Control Arms (UCAs) - Filthy Motorsports - Bing video

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

you could put just eibach spring to replace stock springs but you wont get 2".....only about 1''

 

bilsteins and other shocks have multiple clip positions so its adjustable but your ranchos only have 1 setting for the spring to sit on....

 

up to you and its our truck so whatever feel comfortable with, any shop can do the work......its very basic 

Edited by Dunn
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Dunn said:

you could put just eibach spring to replace stock springs but you wont get 2".....only about 1''

 

bilsteins and other shocks have multiple clip positions so its adjustable but your ranchos only have 1 setting for the spring to sit on....

 

up to you and its our truck so whatever feel comfortable with, any shop can do the work......its very basic 

My suggestion.  Its a higher quality spring than stock and will increase your ride height by approximately 1 inch. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Gangly said:

My suggestion.  Its a higher quality spring than stock and will increase your ride height by approximately 1 inch. 

This may be a dumb question. If I just change the springs instead of a level would I change UCAs still?

Posted

Adding Eibach springs would lift you approximately 1".  I haven't seen, or even heard of, any TB's or AT4's breaking UCA's with 1" of additional lift.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...