Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

rpo NHT Max Trailering is an extra cost option and not standard on any trim level. To ID a truck with Max Towing look for the big trailer mirrors.  No Mirrors, no Max towing.  Hard to find new and harder used.

 

NHT

Max Trailering Package, includes 9.76" rear axle, enhanced cooling radiator, revised shock tuning for increased control, heavier duty rear springs, increased RGAWR and (KW5) 220-amp alternator. NOT AVAILABLE W/Z71 PKG.

 

On the LT trim

Requires (L84) 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 engine, (Z82) Trailering Package, (G80) locking differential and 18" or 20" wheels and tires. Includes (GU6) 3.42 axle ratio and (JL1) trailer brake controller. Not available with (Z71) Z71 Off-Road Package.

  • Like 2
Posted

Dealer also has a brand new 1500 z71 with the 3.0L diesel.  Thoughts?

 

A tad more money, but affordable.  We'll just be eating Ramen for a while...

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, malibu43 said:

Dealer also has a brand new 1500 z71 with the 3.0L diesel.

Sounds like you found your truck.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/2/2021 at 2:08 PM, pokismoki said:

you need a MAXTow WT truck option.  our little 5.3's aren't built to tow with our cooling system. your gear ratio sucks, but if you went with a 5th wheel trailer you could do it safely in 3.08

 

if you have the 8 speed transmission your fine, its just not a good ratio for the 6 speed trucks

 

Huh, might want to tell the engineers who designed and tested the truck in extreme max weight conditions up steep grades in 100 degree heat and let them know... This post can't be serious, can it? A full size V8 truck not designed to tow, haha. 

 

Tyler

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 hours ago, malibu43 said:

Hey everyone.  Thanks for all the info and help.  I was leaning heavily toward re-gearing then talked so some other trailer owners and did some research on how re-gearing will (or won't) affect the legal tow rating for the vehicle, and have decided it's better to upgrade to a new truck.  I really liked my truck and was looking forward to having it paid off soon, but I think this will be a better choice.

 

Inventory is pretty low right now, but we found a very low mileage used 2020 1500 LT with the 5.3L V8 and 8 speed transmission that we are going to look at later.  Had them send a picture of the door stamp and confirmed it has a Max Payload of 2071 lbs and max tow rating of 9600 lbs.  Almost everything else about the truck is equivalent to or better than what I had before.  I'm getting another 5 years of drivetrain warranty out of it, which is a plus.

 

It does need a hitch receiver (which is easy) and a brake controller (which I was going to have to add to my old truck anyway).  I may be back here shortly to ask for recommendations for those.

 

Thanks again for all the help.

I have a 2018 Silverado LT Z71 with the 5.3 and 6 speed (guess that means 3.42 gears?) rated at 9100lbs. I never exceed ~8200lbs with my TT. If I were to buy a bigger truck for towing it would be a 2500HD or 3500HD with the Duramax. But I cant afford what they're wanting for them new or used right now. Plus they are next to impossible to find.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Amcguy1970 said:

 

Huh, might want to tell the engineers who designed and tested the truck in extreme max weight conditions up steep grades in 100 degree heat and let them know... This post can't be serious, can it? A full size V8 truck not designed to tow, haha. 

 

Tyler

let them know what, they already know, the product the gm engineers designed has been sabatoged by GM's sale engineers. increase the engine temp to 220 degrees, install high temp thermostat in thransmission, add punny engine radiator, ya da yada... there are a few other designed in flaws i wont mention.  spend enough time on the forum and you'll get skooled boy!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, jthoske said:

I have a 2018 Silverado LT Z71 with the 5.3 and 6 speed (guess that means 3.42 gears?) rated at 9100lbs. I never exceed ~8200lbs with my TT. If I were to buy a bigger truck for towing it would be a 2500HD or 3500HD with the Duramax. But I cant afford what they're wanting for them new or used right now. Plus they are next to impossible to find.

you can find 2500's them in the GMT900 platform, also hemming.com has good deals on low milage trucks

 

https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/cars-for-sale/gmc/sierra?year_min=2008&year_max=2022

Edited by pokismoki
Posted (edited)

Took 4 pages, but this baby is headed straight for the ditch, let the name calling and chest puffing begin.

:

Key Board Warriors #1000001, Live tonight at 8:00 PM EST on your local forum.....

 

 

Edited by JimCost2014
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

"A 22ft Keystone Passport with a shipped weight of 4660lbs and a carrying capacity of 1770lbs."

 

If you can't tow this behind a 1/2 ton truck you're doing something wrong. Plus, I doubt you'll put 1700 ls of stuff in it.

 

I'm towing a trailer that is literally nearly twice this size with no problems.

  • Like 1
Posted

The 3.0L turbo was bought by someone else 30 minutes before got there. 2 other trucks we were looking at (one another 3.0L) sold this morning just hours after we inquired about going to look after work.  It's crazy right now...

 

Finally got someone to hold onto a 2021 5.3L Z71 RST for us long enough to get down there and make a purchase.  Taking it Mammoth to tent camp in a week, and then will pick up the trailer a week after that and put it to work.

 

Thanks again for all the help!

20210806_181834.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
On 8/7/2021 at 12:11 AM, malibu43 said:

The 3.0L turbo was bought by someone else 30 minutes before got there. 2 other trucks we were looking at (one another 3.0L) sold this morning just hours after we inquired about going to look after work.  It's crazy right now...

 

Finally got someone to hold onto a 2021 5.3L Z71 RST for us long enough to get down there and make a purchase.  Taking it Mammoth to tent camp in a week, and then will pick up the trailer a week after that and put it to work.

 

Thanks again for all the help!

20210806_181834.jpg

Take a short trip with your rig as is.  Afterwards, you'll probably want to get the gears, go for the 3.73s.  Whatever you do, get rid of the transmission thermostat, it's a killer.  Look up "flip the pill".

 

From here you can at your leisure upgrade the rear spring pack, radiator, whatever to have the truck in your driveway do the job needed to your satisfaction.  No need for eating Ramen.

 

My 2012 NHT Sierra will pull your rig all over the country without any mods.  If you can find one, sell yours for a profit and get one of these which certainly costs less in payments but more in maintenance and repairs because of age, possibly, depending on mileage and records.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...